A 6th-century manuscript of Ramayana, which focuses on the separation of Rama and Sita and portrays them more as humans, has been found tucked inside a Purana at a Sanskrit library here. It is markedly different from the more accepted 4 BC Valmiki Ramayana. The 12th-century rendition by Tamil poet Kamba is generally considered the second oldest among the more popular versions. However, now that may change.
The 6th-century manuscript was discovered purely by chance. Scholars working on the 6th-century Vanhi (fire) Purana at the Asiatic Society library were puzzled to find that the manuscript seemed incomplete. They began looking through the Catalogus Catalogorum – a global repository of Sanskrit manuscripts compiled by German scholar Aufrecht – and realized two more identical manuscripts existed.One was preserved at the India Office Library, London; the second at the Kolkata-based Samskrita Sahitya Parishad, a 100-year-old research institution.
[wp_ad_camp_1]
The scholars scoured the archives and found the complete version of the Vanhi Purana manuscript. When they were analyzing it, they stumbled upon the Dasa Griba Rakshash Charitram Vadha, which did not have any bearing with the Vanhi Purana. For some time they could not understand why the slokas of the Purana suddenly started telling another story – albeit a familiar one, as the main characters were Rama, Sita and Ravana. Before long, they realized it was a 6th-century version with many interpolations.
“Interestingly in this version, there are just five kandas (sections) instead of the accepted seven. There is no Balakanda – the part that deals with Rama’s childhood – or Uttarkanda. This Ramayana ends with the return of Rama and Sita from exile and his ascension to the Ayodhya throne,” said Anasuya Bhowmick, lead scholar of the Asiatic Society, who is working with the manuscript. This Ramayana does not begin with the curse that drove Dasarath to send his son to exile.
Instead, it begins with a curse that befell goddess Lakshmi when Shukracharya got angry with Narayan for killing Shukracharya’s wife.
The other curse falls on both Lakshmi and Narayan when Dharitri cannot bear the pain of the constant battle between gods and demons. In both cases, Laxmi and Narayan are told they will have to bear the pain of separation.
“Ram here is more human than God, with follies like anger and failure. Some interesting details – like the ages of Sita and Rama at the time of marriage and the date when Sita was abducted by Ravana -are in this version,” said scholar Manabendu Bandyopadhyay.
Lovely…..
Indian Gods are eveywhere .. But i am saying is wrong . They are not only god for hindusam or indian they are for whole universe .. That world needs to understand….. They are exists before hindusam… But now days other religen people call then only hindu gods.. But they have to understand they are belongs to the same our goods… Cheers!
Shukracharya got angry with Narain for killing Shukracharya’s wife ……. I think that it is not coorrect. .. Correct is that ………… Shukracharya got angry with Narayan for killing Shukracharya’s Mother ………….
Thank you
Now we dont know what is correct Ramaayana, Mahaa Bhaaratha and all Puraanaas.Pl keep giving full Raamaayana paart by paart.
Bula.
God never differentiates between peopl, there are no cast and only one religion, which is humanity or being human, if some one is not able to practice humanity, never mind what his faith is there is not fruit.
Feed the hungry and treat all nimals and insects equally, … Vinaka
i love hinduism and i am proud to be hindu.
Thank you for providing new insights into our ancient culture.
It is very interesting to see different versions of Ramayana. When Ramanujan worte 100 Ramayanas he was banished by the conservative persons who do not want to see beyond what they wanted to see. Let the full version come out so that we can enjoy that part also. The main thing we forget is we do not want to understand the philosophy these epics teach us. We are only interested in the stories ant the real meaning of these epics. One example is when we read Srimad Bhagawatham of attend the Sapthagam the Acharyas are explaining very elaborately the Krishavathat and his leelas but they skip the Samvathas between Krishna and Uddhava or Uddhava and Narada etc. This is my personal opinion only as I know my ignorance well.
As Amoj J says, God or the unknown POWER exists from the time the creation existed. Each religion gave a name to that power. So it is apparent that the power or GOD is the same in whatever name you call.