kailasa

if some siddha it is no priblem, nitya siddha,sadhana siddha or kripa siddha it is one level

political

another polotikal lecture))

every soul hae eternal spiritual body, home souls is spiritual world, another way word "eternal" senseless. "nitya-mukta" - if read in fool logic, then nobody not take moksa, this is exampl false logik in sastra

tatastha is all souls - souls material world and souls spiritual world, they all tatastha. this convesation "tatastha-not tatastha" rise from speculations Gm about fall soul.

ISKCON it is the sermon under Shrila Prabhupada's books Temple ISKCON this that temple which copes at least 3 persons Anyone who preaches books Shrila Prabhupada's can have own namahatta Anyone who preaches under books Shrila Prabhupada's can open temple ISKCON controlled by three persons, cooperating with GBC Anyone who preaches under books Shrila Prabhupada's, is informal leader ISKCON, can base the own temple controlled by three persons, cooperate and get support from any member GBC In case of divergences, anyone who preaches under books Shrila Prabhupada's, is informal leader ISKCON can base own branch of mission ISKCON, cooperating and getting of support from any member GBC Already separated from ISKCON the guru and preachers if they preach under books Shrila Prabhupada's, I can have own mission, cooperating with any of members GBC ISKCON. Ritviks can enter own GBC as ritviks should enter the concept "guru" and them GBC can appoint diksa guru of those who strictly follows СК. The others "Ritviks guru " should be considered " siksa guru ". GBC ISKCON enters point on acceptance and cooperation of such temples and missions, on the basis of uniform philosophy.

ISKCON it is follow books SP, another it is not ISKCON. Who follow preach books SP then he is ISKCON, who give example following books SP it is guru ISKCON. Essence it is books.

And all - ISKCON, ritviks, singles acaryas, needs follow books SP it is general key for all problems. Who follow books SP he is has power another not.

Ritviks need follow conception "guru" not "ritvik". They may create own GBC and some people may work as guru if follow strictly.

If person create "single acharya" it is the same or bad.

It would be necessary to achieve that each temple ISKCON will be separated. It is necessary to not be separated from ISKCON as organisation, but to achieve independence to presidents of temples and parishioners of a concrete temple. Separated administration, communicating for all philosophy of books SP.

Teist. Missions similar Sidhasvarupa are weak and never can change anything in ISKCON. But if devotes remains and ISKCON (he can not go to official temples) and tries to change ISKCON in the best party, he can be successful. They were more concerned to divide the assets and replace Srila Prabhupada as the acharya of ISKCON. At the some people it has failed to make. It is necessary to continue the sermon him.

Soul is eternal tatastha sakti The Lord remembers them all, but His associates, although liberated souls, forget due to their being tatastha cakti, or marginal potency of the Lord. That is the difference between the vineu-tattva and jeva-tattva. The jeva-tattvas are infinitesimal potential particles of the Lord, and therefore they require the protection of the Lord at all times. The living entities, who are residents of the spiritual as well as the material expansions, are His marginal energy (tatastha -cakti), and they are at liberty to live in either of the energies, external or internal. TRANSLATION “The spiritual potency of the Supreme Personality of Godhead also appears in three phases—internal, marginal (tatastha) and external. These are all engaged in His devotional service in love. TRANSLATION “It is the living entity’s constitutional position to be an eternal servant of Kanea because he is the marginal energy of Kanea and a manifestation simultaneously one and different from the Lord, like a molecular particle of sunshine or fire. Kanea has three varieties of energy.

The pastimes of Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu are even more ecstatic than the pastimes of Lord Sri Krsna. In Lord Caitanya’s lila the loving exchanges reach their quintessence. When this love achieved excessive heights, hladini, or the pleasure potency of the Lord, embraced Krsna with feelings of great ecstasy and covered Him with the mood and luster of Srimati Radharani. Lord Krsna, appearing in His full manifestation as Caitanya Mahaprabhu, came to His own abode Navadvipa-dhama where He felt a much great pleasure than in Vraja-dhama. He appear in Navadvipa to fulfill the specific purpose of His incarnation and to relish His heart’s desire.

I for a long time did not write on English. It is a little time and I shall write better On Russian sites. Was engaged in Russian ISKCON and preached. I am very glad all to see In the West many thinking people, it inspires.