Navel in the Gravel

[Guest guest]

Anything other than what is already here, no matter how beautiful and

captivating, will always turn out to be a mirage. A mirage can never satisfy

your thirst. Therefore, you have to truly understand what is already here.

What is always here? People speak of being in the present moment. It is

just a way of speaking. Truly, you are not in the present moment, You Are

Always The Present Moment. You Are the Presence. The Self-Knowing Clarity,

The True Presence, reveals It Self as the spring of wisdom having no

location. Where does it reside other than where you already are. Is it

possible to truly understand anyone's suffering other than your own? Is it

possible to know anything other than One's Own Self?

 

Love to all

Harsha

[Guest guest]

<< Anything other than what is already here, no matter how beautiful

andcaptivating, will always turn out to be a mirage. A mirage can

never satisfyyour thirst. Therefore, you have to truly understand

what is already here.What is always here? People speak of being in

the present moment. It isjust a way of speaking. Truly, you are not

in the present moment, You AreAlways The Present Moment. You Are the

Presence. The Self-Knowing Clarity,The True Presence, reveals It Self

as the spring of wisdom having nolocation. Where does it reside other

than where you already are. Is itpossible to truly understand

anyone's suffering other than your own? Is itpossible to know

anything other than One's Own Self?Love to allHarsha >>

 

Is it possible to know One's Own Self?

There is a beauty in looking, but then who is the Own looking at the Self?

And when there is being the beauty vanishes for there is nothing to look at and from at.

 

SATCHIDANANDA

 

Three sides of a "coin" pointing to Brahman that cannot be formulated.

 

SatChidAnanda could be compared, why not, to the formula founding quantum physics E=h/f.

 

E (energy) would be here Sat (The absolute Being identical to Brahman): One

h (plank constant limiting the possibility of knowing matter as

particle and wave at the same time) would be here Chit (The I Am even

when I do not think in the cogito sense), a constant that does not

change: Own

1/f (the period of a wave or 1 divided by the frequency this wave

moves) would be here Ananda (The Pure Joy felt in Samadhi): Self

 

E=h/f

One's own self

 

3 fingers pointing in the direction that has no center.

 

Yes it is what I am if saying such a thing may mean something.

 

Antoine

Attachment: (image/jpeg) 3pcircle.jpg [not stored]

[Guest guest]

Dear AnToine,

You wrote:

>>>>>SatChidAnanda could be compared, why not, to the formula founding

quantum physics E=h/f. E (energy) would be here Sat (The absolute

Being identical to Brahman): One h (plank constant limiting the

possibility of knowing matter as particle and wave at the same time)

would be here Chit (The I Am even when I do not think in the cogito

sense), a constant that does not change: Own. 1/f (the period of a

wave or 1 divided by the frequency this wave moves) would be here

Ananda (The Pure Joy felt in Samadhi): Self E=h/f One's own self. 3

Fingers pointing in the direction that has no center. Three sides of

a "coin" pointing to Brahman that cannot be formulated.<<<<<<<<<

This is delightful Antoine. I like that SatChitAnanda (SCA) stuff. Aurobindo wrote loads about it.

Neat: the three sides of wholeness, oneness, unity -----> Brahman.

Years ago when I was still an active guru (hehehe), I included with

Tapas to the threesome (SCAT) guided by Juan Matis (Don Juan) and

Aurobindo.

I have somewhere else (see the file section of this egroup),

www./A+collection+of+Wims+posts

pointed out that in Tibetan Buddhist representations often a triple

'yin/yang' type symbol is used to express what you just wrote about.

Instead of the two 'fishes' though (yin/yang), it shows three

'fishes' (yin/yum/yang). I have seen four 'fishes' as well,

(yin/yab/yum/yang). This foursome eventually developed into swastika

symbolism. Also, I already suggested elsewhere that we should

consider that these kind of symbols are 'somewhat clumsy' attempts to

depict the multi-dimensionality of existence/essence. (2D, 3D, 4D). I

have also pointed to the fact that there is only wholeness/'unity and

zero (O and 0,) from which 'diversion' originates into the appearance

of the multiplicity of individual quantum units through interference

patterning creating space/time and relativity in the process of

active/passive creation.

As I like say it, through our heart go three axes : upward/downward

(earth/heaven), leftward/rightward (male/female), forward/backward

(past/future). Of course this description simplifies 'things' very

much as all directions originate from 0 (I Am NowHere) in any which

way direction. (Problem: If there are 360 degrees in a circle how

many are there in sphere?)

You are much fun Antoine.

Love,

Wim

(wight lhite=white light=breight nite)

(fool muun toenhite?)