Guest guest Posted December 7, 2000 Report Share Posted December 7, 2000 Hi I have observed something recently,.. Behind all the 'spiritual' seeking for the last many years, there is a demand/desire which yells 'No more pain !'. If one looks at the whole creation, it seems that, from molecules to plants, animals and man, the mantra 'no more pain' is the common Cry of all.. a concern with moving towards harmony, feeling healthy/well ...and away from Disturbance or threat to one's well-being. In this context, one can say that this cry & concern is natural and nothing wrong with it. So one embarks on 'paths' of removing/preventing the Disturbance/dis- ease. However it seems, that by doing so the 'cry' is actually being reinforced and therefore, more pain. probably even more pain than that of the 'non-spiritually'-interested people. Even trying to let-go, or 'just Be' or non-doing, is more of the same, .. a resistance to the what-is of life. It seems to me, that this Resistance is, at least, one of the factors that prevent the living Presence of Awareness 'showing the way'. Wanting to let go of Resistance, is more resistance.. (there is a motive,.. and since the 'cry' is such an old and Powerfull conditioned response, there does not seem much hope in doing anything about it. And perhaps, If one would stop there, would be very 'healthy', -but one does not,.. one gets depressed/desperate ..and so more of the same. So,.. any suggestion for a way out ? jb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2000 Report Share Posted December 7, 2000 On 12/7/00 at 1:22 PM J B wrote: [...] º ºSo,.. any suggestion for a way out ? ºjb. No - there is no "way out": SENTIENT LIFE ITSELF IS "THE WAY OUT" because there is nothing but Awareness. A "way out" from what already could be called "way out" is impossible - a mirage, an illusion. The seeming separation from Awareness is the main cause of suffering and paths, methods, religions etc. are likely to (at least initially) increase the sense of separation before it is severed. Without separation, pain loses its sting and pleasure ceases to be addictive. Life wasn't meant as suffering, but as a celebration, in the same sense the beauty of a flower can be enjoyed while fully aware of its transient nature... Although both knowledge and means are available to end (undue) suffering on this planet swiftly, that doesn't happen. A visiting alien could define that as "the ultimate stupidity". Love, Jan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2000 Report Share Posted December 8, 2000 , "jb" <kvy9@l...> wrote: > On 12/7/00 at 1:22 PM J B wrote: > > [...] > º > ºSo,.. any suggestion for a way out ? > ºjb. > > No - there is no "way out": SENTIENT LIFE ITSELF IS "THE WAY OUT" because there is nothing but Awareness. A "way out" from what already could be called "way out" is impossible - a mirage, an illusion. The seeming separation from Awareness is the main cause of suffering and paths, methods, religions etc. are likely to (at least initially) increase the sense of separation before it is severed. Without separation, pain loses its sting and pleasure ceases to be addictive. Life wasn't meant as suffering, but as a celebration, in the same sense the beauty of a flower can be enjoyed while fully aware of its transient nature... Although both knowledge and means are available to end (undue) suffering on this planet swiftly, that doesn't happen. A visiting alien could define that as "the ultimate stupidity". > > Love, > Jan Hi Jan Thanks for the reply. The following I have found significant: "Although both knowledge and means are available to end (undue) suffering on this planet swiftly, that doesn't happen. A visiting alien could define that as "the ultimate stupidity"." Yes, the conclusion, is very appropriate. And yet, JB for example, is one of those 99,99% of humanity being absorbed in "ultimate stupidity". Which brings another question: What is the difference between those belonging to this category and those who do not ? Someone has given this explanation: ignorance. Well I heard that one before, but it does not make me more 'intelligent'. Sometimes, I reflect on teachers, who like Buddha, Ramana, Jesus, J.Krishanmurti and others, used all their lifetime 'preaching'.. but 99,99999% of the listeners have not changed. You can look no further than Christianity, which in spite of 'love your neighbor as thyself',.. in its name, millions of humans have been butchered. Along with the reflection, there comes this picture of a human talking and trying to teach monkeys something.. and in some cases the monkeys even seem to change (though thru mere mechanical copying of the human behaviour) but it remains what it is a monkey.. or perhaps parrot is a better example. And some think they _have_ actually become humans, and start to preach to others, but in some cases they just think to be the case.. So.. What would you say, could minimize the number of disciples treading the path of 'ultimate stupidity' ? jb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2000 Report Share Posted December 8, 2000 On 12/8/00 at 1:48 PM J B wrote: º , "jb" <kvy9@l...> wrote: º> On 12/7/00 at 1:22 PM J B wrote: º> º> [...] º> º º> ºSo,.. any suggestion for a way out ? º> ºjb. º> º> No - there is no "way out": SENTIENT LIFE ITSELF IS "THE WAY OUT" ºbecause there is nothing but Awareness. A "way out" from what already ºcould be called "way out" is impossible - a mirage, an illusion. The ºseeming separation from Awareness is the main cause of suffering and ºpaths, methods, religions etc. are likely to (at least initially) ºincrease the sense of separation before it is severed. Without ºseparation, pain loses its sting and pleasure ceases to be addictive. ºLife wasn't meant as suffering, but as a celebration, in the same ºsense the beauty of a flower can be enjoyed while fully aware of its ºtransient nature... Although both knowledge and means are available ºto end (undue) suffering on this planet swiftly, that doesn't happen. ºA visiting alien could define that as "the ultimate stupidity". º> º> Love, º> Jan º ºHi Jan ºThanks for the reply. My pleasure... ºThe following I have found significant: º"Although both knowledge and means are available to end (undue) ºsuffering on this planet swiftly, that doesn't happen. A visiting ºalien could define that as "the ultimate stupidity"." º ºYes, the conclusion, is very appropriate. ºAnd yet, JB for example, is one of those 99,99% of humanity being ºabsorbed in "ultimate stupidity". Yet in every individual of this 99.99%, both knowledge and means are existing - as a seed, or potential.. ºWhich brings another question: ºWhat is the difference between those belonging to this category and ºthose who do not ? "Something" has to happen before the "seed of knowledge" starts to germinate. In my case, I became convinced that "worldly life had no potential for true happiness" and gave up "the will to live and enjoy". For some, this "something" is the conviction that "sentient life is suffering". Others, by realizing that at death, everything has to be given up, surrender while alive. Still others, discovering they are not just "body", wonder "who am I?" And there are those, discovering one can only love Love... But these are the exceptions, the 0.01% - default is that a child automatically will take the parents and/or other members of the family for a role model - parents who are "aware" are invaluable. In this "ideal" case, Awareness isn't "forgotten" in childhood and realization is effortless. Jnanadeva is one of the finest examples of this. How realization will be implemented in "individual" life is another matter - for that reason, the Buddha emphasized that: "one can rejoice his/her feelings after attaining nirvana (with substratum remaining), when not, they will be burnt too" (rendered in my words). ºSomeone has given this explanation: ignorance. ºWell I heard that one before, but it does not make me ºmore 'intelligent'. My explanation would be that this "seed of knowledge" has been covered by many weeds of utterly useless mental constructs (conditioning), to such an extent that even when this is recognized, the weeds won't disappear by themselves. Although recognizing or intuiting that the afore can be seen as a correct representation, could be defined as "intelligent", that does not change one bit: without a "something" to happen, the weeds won't disappear. There is a certain similarity with the acquisition of language skills: in childhood, learning of many languages is effortless, in adulthood, it means a lot of effort. For adults, the only "hope" the intellect can supply, is the utter "hopelessness" of the situation - seemingly separated from Awareness. ºSometimes, I reflect on teachers, who like Buddha, Ramana, Jesus, ºJ.Krishanmurti and others, used all their lifetime 'preaching'.. but º99,99999% of the listeners have not changed. You can look no further ºthan Christianity, which in spite of 'love your neighbor as ºthyself',.. in its name, millions of humans have been butchered. Exactly - the preaching "works" for those, who take the realized one as the role-mode that was missed in childhood, or for those who are "on the edge" already and they become the most ardent disciples. Whatever a teaching, any part of it can be taken out of context and abused. The "message" conveyed in all teachings is what children have to be brought up with, from aware parents, the "living examples" of such those teachings. º ºAlong with the reflection, there comes this picture of a human ºtalking and trying to teach monkeys something.. and in some cases the ºmonkeys even seem to change (though thru mere mechanical copying of ºthe human behaviour) but it remains what it is a monkey.. or perhaps ºparrot is a better example. Monkeys and parrots, an image quite familiar... The main reason for preaching and teaching is the simple fact that humans are social animals and their greatest joy is to see happy faces all around - so whether or not teaching is effective, if even one individual is benefited, it is considered worthwhile. There is a major difference between humans and monkeys though: When a banana is buried in front of two caged monkeys and a large stone is put over it, the monkeys, when freed, will start to fight and the winner will try to lift up the stone. After being exhausted, the winner is beaten up by the weaker monkey who will try to lift the stone. Until he is exhausted, and is beaten up and this will repeat.. Humans will lift the stone and then start fighting º ºAnd some think they _have_ actually become humans, and start to ºpreach to others, but in some cases they just think to be the case.. The Buddha started to preach when "enlightened" and so do many Westerners. But the Buddha did have a vast background and many years of ascetic experience. The impact of the Buddha was the Buddha - not the teaching. No doubt this goes for many teachers... º ºSo.. ºWhat would you say, could minimize the number of disciples treading ºthe path of 'ultimate stupidity' ? º ºjb. The example was given in the middle ages - there were spiritual communities of Cathars, who were aware that a change has to be fundamental - they didn't take the risk of having filled up children's minds with "rubbish". Those communities were a kind of Satsangh, spiritual hothouses and considered a danger to the ruling class. So they were exterminated (inquisition). Love, Jan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.