The Preposterous P - Article

January 18, 2001

Dear Antoine

You wrote:

> Also there is a nice theory in physics that

> goes that there is only one photon.

And I have posted about that, as I experienced it some years ago, I call

IT the "one article." The theory originated with John Wheeler and

Richard Feynman of Princeton I believe, however in those days Wheeler

thought it was the electron instead of the photon. They later on

jokingly thought they should forget about it. In one of my experiential

visions IT became abundantly SELF evident. Of course in science it is

prudent to call it a theory etc. etc.

I do not have enough scientific background to write about it in a lucid

manner, but I have posted on it various times, accounting of it as a

mystical visionary experience which is nevertheless as truthful as a

proven scientific theory. This experience by the way is nothing special

as it is what is... and is recoverable by anyone... as it is what is...

Let me see if I can find the posts...

Here's one:

-

Wim Borsboom <aurasphere

Kundalini <Kundalini-Gateway >;

;

December 25, 2000 9:10 PM

Re: Happening

Dear So and So,

Your experiences are of course very wonderful and truthful...

experiences of the holy, the mysterious, mystical and... physical... in

the realities of the human body and our good and lovely earth. A

watchful witnessing participation in its creative, generative even

genetic processes.

Instead of astral travel in the 'outside world', I also move into the

'inside

worlds', the miniscule worlds inside the body, organs, cells, atoms,

molecular structures, subnuclear particles. Of course size is only

relative

as ONE is really nothing of any size. If anything, one is the energetic

presence of an electron (huh??) (more on that later).

<snips>

Do you remember, a little while ago, I wrote about the one particle

concept, Richard Feynman and John Wheeler (Princeton) fantasizing that

"there only be just one particle". Only one particle (no more) that

figured out that when it moved (--- the first happening ---) and when it

did that quickly enough, a hilarious divine cheat and feat occurred, it

would be in two places at once, and then faster, in four, then eight,

then sixteen etc. 'exponential'. (This is my experiential version of the

event

as R.F. and J.W. thought in terms of a worldline, my version is in multi

dimensional time.) Then before 'it' knew - and that was 'its' game - it

would be 'all over the place' as 'it' created space and time doing

that --- just that one particle --- I call it the ONE ARTICLE, Leon

Ledermann calls it the God Particle, although he does not mean

exactly the same.

There is something so fantastically great about that, we are not just

'all one', we are 'all just one', as we are 'one and all'. A timeless

and spaceless divine presence and consciousness that is able to 'know'

as well as 'not know' about its whereabouts. It can be momentarily aware

or unaware at an any intersection of its own meandering roadways in the

'time and space grids' that it itself so playfully creates in the first

place, 'right off the bat".

When I went through this experience, it not being conceptual... "I

witnesses and perceives as well as participates" (Sorry, hehehe, this is

funny language. I will have to leave it like that.) I am the particle

AND of course (between you and me) YOU are that as well... as WE

participate in each other, are each other's artefact and sacrifact.,

artifice and sacrifice, artful and holy action in communicative embrace.

This experience is the most primal and enduring, it is BEING BEEN

actively and passively, creatively and surrenderingly.

I have gone through other later (?) evolutionary stages of existence,

all happening of course in this moment, but relatively we might consider

them happening over time, such are our conceptual agreements.

What is happening with you?! Might that not be of the same kind as my

creational realizations? Your consciousness becoming at one with that

'particular / articular' divine consciousness, your participation in the

natural energetic cosmic processes also on a physical level in addition

to the conscious and spiritual one...?

'That all this is', in time and space, I consider the miracle.

It is no sweat to be God.

It is fascinating to be all this in its myriad of forms!

If I were God (hehehe) I would do exactly what is happening now

(heehee).

I, at one point, stopped the intensity of my macro and micro cosmic

watches as my functionality changed for the time being. Although still,

all through the day I am aware of all these macro as well as micro

happenings,

Love, Wim

http://www.aurasphere.dhs.org

January 18, 2001

Hi Wim,

I don't know if you are trying to be ironic here, but I hear this as

irony...

Wim Borsboom wrote:

> I do not have enough scientific background to write about it in a

> lucid

> manner, but I have posted on it various times, accounting of it as a

> mystical visionary experience which is nevertheless as truthful as a

> proven scientific theory.

The whole point of science is that one can never prove a scientific

theory. It's impossible. What happens is that scientific theories are

conditionally accepted so long as there is no hard evidence against

them. Once there is agreement that a theory does not fit the facts, no

matter how long people have believed in it, it gets chucked. Newton's

law of gravity held up for hundreds of years before Einstein shot it

down. So, I either read your comments as saying that this mystical

visionary experience is NOT true, or that you (as many others - no

judgement here at all on this score) don't appreciate the way science

works. I find it frustrating when people assume that science deals in

proof and authority, when in reality, it is just the opposite. Science

has been so successful in ferreting out the material secrets of the

world by doubting itself. (Kind of an "anti-faith" principle.) Anyway,

I think your mystical experience stands on its own and doesn't need the

false propping up against some "authoritative" science. People who have

had mystical experiences will easily grant you yours and those who have

not and are skeptical won't believe you no matter what you say. I like

the way you describe the one particle hypothesis in your early posts.

That guy really gets around, huh? Yum!

Love, Mark

January 18, 2001

Mark W. Otter [mark.otter]

comment to Wim: