Communication?

[Guest guest]

Dear Judi,

 

I wrote:

>> moments of unresolved grief or grieving.

You wrote:

> *It* never gets "resolved" Wim, but "dissolved."

 

What do you refer to with your use of the word "it"? I used two words grief

and grieving; not the same meaning these two words.

Also resolving and dissolving are not mutually exclusive, after resolution

dissolution may take place, both may be part of a process to handle grief or

grieving.

 

J:

> Love is not about winning, never was, never will be.

 

Do you interpret what I write and how I write as though it has to do with

winning? Another word association that points to an engram linked to

unresolved grief or grieving.

 

J:

> ...what did you think love was?

> Where you get to ride around the victor or something?

 

Your association, Judi!

 

I may have to plead daftness though, as I do not see how one can connect

"love" to "riding around the victor or something" unless it is again one of

those word associations that uncovers more and more about the subconscious.

Slowly a picture develops that shows more about you, what is hidden by the

metaphors...

You did it again, "...Riding around..." nothing wrong with metaphors, I have

said that before, but yours are now turning into semaphores.

 

No wonder communicating with you is difficult. When one converses one has to

listen with care, with correspondence one has to read with care. When one

answers (with the written or spoken word) one has to prevent ambiguity.

When one is imprecise, one cannot count on the intuition of the other person

as intuition gets so often clouded by fears or expectations.

 

W:

>> ...to do with the difficulty of

>> conditional and unconditional love.

J:

> It's not difficult Wim, it's impossible!

 

Again the use of the word "it" where I used two words: conditional and

unconditional love.

So Judi, what is impossible?

 

Love, Wim