pattern of higher attunement

[Guest guest]

> Perhaps others can make observations on the possibility of

miscommunications

> on e-mail. I know that Greg-Ji is our role model when it comes to e-mail

> communications and we would appreciate some guidance from Greg on this.

And

> others, Amanda, Gloria, Jerry, Linda, Mike, Mark, Robert, Wim, Jessica,

and

> anyone please feel free to share. In a virtual Satsangh like this one, the

> quality and the method of expression needs some care and sensitivity to

> others.

>

> Love to all

> Harsha

 

 

Dear

> Perhaps others can make observations on the possibility of

miscommunications

> on e-mail. I know that Greg-Ji is our role model when it comes to e-mail

> communications and we would appreciate some guidance from Greg on this.

And

> others, Amanda, Gloria, Jerry, Linda, Mike, Mark, Robert, Wim, Jessica,

and

> anyone please feel free to share. In a virtual Satsangh like this one, the

> quality and the method of expression needs some care and sensitivity to

> others.

>

> Love to all

> Harsha

 

 

Dear Harsha,

There is sometimes a focus on what we say.

For those on the path we must equally consider

what we hear.

Some people react well to kind

words and are repulsed by unkindness.

Surprisingly others are stimulated and attracted

to conflict and find kindness bland and uninspiring.

The middle way of non-attachment to extremes is also

possible.

Miscommunication in one sense never exists,

we merely CHOOSE to hear the communication in a

way that suits our model of reality.

Effective communication may sometimes remove the

element of choice and insist on being heard.

This is when we have to listen most carefully

for there is a pattern of higher attunement

being transmitted in every contact.

Care and sensitivity often exists more

in receptivity than in expression . . .

 

Be Well

Lobster

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/28/01 8:49:47 AM Mountain Standard Time,

lobster writes:

 

<< Care and sensitivity often exists more

in receptivity than in expression . . . >>

 

Hear, hear!!!! Holly