Guest guest Posted April 18, 2001 Report Share Posted April 18, 2001 At 09:06 PM 4/17/01, you wrote: >Namaste Angelique, > >I seem to remember getting the boot off your list for a difference in >theology. What kind of freedom of speech is that? ROTFLOL!! You are one of several people who seem to get a lot of mileage from imagining yourself my victim. Get over it! You were not booted off, and last time I looked you are still d.. web only. You were put on moderated status for your intolerance of anyone who had a good word for your ex-Guru... which followed your intolerance of anyone who crticised him. If people want to behave like the monkeys they are, rather than the >humans they can become, then its their karma. As long as children and >other monkeys that want to be human aren't given 'attachments', by the >diversions of pornography, and it doesn't encourage molestation by >perverts. There were perverts long before there was pornography. There will still be perverts if pornography is banned.. if anything, they are more likely to become predatory if denied another outlet. There are sexual predators masquerading as Priests and Gurus, who don't go near porn.. do you think Sai Baba indulges in porn? No? Yet, you have often accused him of perverse, predatory behavior. So much for your argument.. pooof! The real irony, is that if not for the K-list being subsidized for many years by my work as a Pro-Dominatrix.. which allowed me the cash and leisure time to run it, (before I moved it to ) there would be no K-list.. and possibly no Satsangh list, either. >There has to be absolute controls, if that isn't possible >then it should all be banned. Now, there's a tolerant attitude.. <grin> >Most of the socalled tantra is just >distorted crap of the original teaching by horny old bastards looking >for another reason to get it off........Tony. If not for sex, Tony, you would never have been born. If your parents were tantricas who redirected the procreative energy upwards, or chose to be celibate, you would never have been born. Yet, you live, you spew judgments, you attempt to repress.. and it doesn't mean a thing. Sex is the strongest force in nature, and it is Sacred. It is fortunate for you, that your parents were horny monkeys who indulged in sex.. :) Blessings! PS: While I felt it proper to defend against your erroneous accusations, I imagine Harsha would prefer we did not rehash this old argument here.. peace to you.You can respond if you like, but I'll not reply. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Shaman, Psychic, Empath, Healer www.fire-serpent.org/healing/ Fire Serpent Tantra www.fire-serpent.com Kundalini Gateway www.Kundalini-gateway.org Personal website www.domin8rex.com ================================================ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2001 Report Share Posted April 18, 2001 , Mystress Angelique Serpent > > PS: While I felt it proper to defend against your erroneous accusations, I > imagine Harsha would prefer we did not rehash this old argument here.. > peace to you.You can respond if you like, but I'll not reply. Thanks Angelique. Love, Amanda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2001 Report Share Posted April 18, 2001 , Mystress Angelique Serpent <Mystress@k...> wrote: > > At 09:06 PM 4/17/01, you wrote: > >Namaste Angelique, > > > >I seem to remember getting the boot off your list for a difference in > >theology. What kind of freedom of speech is that? > > ROTFLOL!! You are one of several people who seem to get a lot of > mileage from imagining yourself my victim. Get over it! > You were not booted off, and last time I looked you are still > d.. web only. You were put on moderated status for your > intolerance of anyone who had a good word for your ex-Guru... which > followed your intolerance of anyone who crticised him. > > If people want to behave like the monkeys they are, rather than the > >humans they can become, then its their karma. As long as children and > >other monkeys that want to be human aren't given 'attachments', by the > >diversions of pornography, and it doesn't encourage molestation by > >perverts. > > There were perverts long before there was pornography. There will > still be perverts if pornography is banned.. if anything, they are more > likely to become predatory if denied another outlet. There are sexual > predators masquerading as Priests and Gurus, who don't go near porn.. do > you think Sai Baba indulges in porn? No? Yet, you have often accused him of > perverse, predatory behavior. > So much for your argument.. pooof! > > The real irony, is that if not for the K-list being subsidized for > many years by my work as a Pro-Dominatrix.. which allowed me the cash and > leisure time to run it, (before I moved it to ) there would be no > K-list.. and possibly no Satsangh list, either. > > >There has to be absolute controls, if that isn't possible > >then it should all be banned. > > Now, there's a tolerant attitude.. <grin> > > >Most of the socalled tantra is just > >distorted crap of the original teaching by horny old bastards looking > >for another reason to get it off........Tony. > > If not for sex, Tony, you would never have been born. If your parents > were tantricas who redirected the procreative energy upwards, or chose to > be celibate, you would never have been born. Yet, you live, you spew > judgments, you attempt to repress.. and it doesn't mean a thing. Sex is the > strongest force in nature, and it is Sacred. > It is fortunate for you, that your parents were horny monkeys who > indulged in sex.. :) > Blessings! Namaste Angelique et al, I think you will find that I was booted off the K list and then later moderated. The cause wasn't sai baba and his pedophilia, (you probably read the article I organised in the Vancouver Sun. http://www.vancouversun.com/newsite/news/010227/5007932.html The cause was terminology and differences over K. I proffered that Sakti wasn't in fact the energy but Saguna Brahman or Goddess Herself. Energy or K is actually Prana. K is everywhere, not just in the sushumna. There was also another difference when I stated that the Crown Chakra isn't enlightenment and that the move to the 'Heart Centre', which is also extant, was req'd. Also that most of the K experiences relayed are not real. I also quoted Lakshamana Swami and Sarada Devi on this. With regard to Tantra, the idea of it being sexual is just a distortion of the teaching of K or Realisation. The only person that could perform the sexual tantra without attachment would be a jivanmukti and they wouldn't be interested in such a diversion. It is a known psychological fact that porn influences the mind of perverts and precipitates actions. I didn't say ban it, I said control it, to prevent children seeing it or anyone else accidentally forming more attachments, vikaras, vasanas and attachments. It is a matter for debate whether I was lucky my parents were horny monkeys and I was conceived. A child cries at birth, the relatives cry when he dies. He is happy at death! 'Who' dies anyway? I am not pc and for all this so called tantra etc, it is just more attachment. You can stimulate a part of a woman's brain to produce orgasms, that does that make the machine or the technician the Goddess? Sex is just an animal attachment that's all, eventually to be discarded..........Om Namah Sivaya......Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.