Guest guest Posted April 29, 2001 Report Share Posted April 29, 2001 --- Dear Tony, that would of course depend on your view, your perception if you will. there is need to hunt, the animals become over populated and suffer horribly otherwise. There is only enough food for a certain number, beyong that number, there is starvation, disease, suffering that was not ment to be because we have placed ourselves outside of our place in the sacred circle of life. We do not choose our place, it was granted us by grandfather in his wisdom. When we choose to leave this place that was granted to us in the name of "progress", we do untold damage. Within the Circle, there are many roles, it is needed to maintain balance, not my design, it is that of grandfather and i am not worthy to question his wisdom. He created all, and did so as He saw fit and proper. Just as easily He can wipe away that which displeases Him, we would all do well to remember that. Love Gracie In , "Tony O'Clery" <aoclery> wrote: > , crookedlace wrote: > > ---Dear Tony, > > That would depend on the culture you pose the question to. In my > > culture, it is not seen as improper if you pay the proper respect > to > > the one you take, take only what is needed and say a prayer for the > > spirit of the one who has sacrificed for the good of the many. Life > > is a sacred circle, or it is so among my people. the creatures > > here are our brothers, the earth our mother, the creator is the > > Grandfather to all living things, and loves us all equally. > > Grandfather teaches us that When you do harm to the least of your > > brothers, you do so also unto me. All that live must eventually > > die, it is how you live and die that is of importance. If you > > remember to tread lightly upon the face of our mother earth, have > > respect for all your brothers, take only what is needed and never > > without asking, or thanking the one who offers to meet your needs, > > Then you have acted in the proper way. Life must be in balance. > > Without the taking of some of our animal brothers, they would be > > always sick, hungry, diseased, in pain, this is not the proper way, > > life would then be out of balance. So you see my brother it is > > dependant upon the culture you pose your question to on the response > > you receive. > > Love Gracie > > > > In , "Tony O'Clery" <aoclery> wrote: > > > Namast All, > > > > > > Do you consider the inability to connect the suffering and death > of > > an > > > animal with what is on your plate, a lack of spiritual > developement > > > and awareness. Om Namah Sivaya....Tony > > Namaste, > > Then why not eat your pet human, dog, or cat then. What is the > difference. As far as Native Indians go, it is my experience that > hunting is unnecessary. There are even supermarkets in the arctic. So > why continue with an unnecessary culture? > > It indicates extreme attachment or addiction to meat. This indicates a > n underdeveloped spiritual awareness or vijnanamayakosa...ONS Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.