Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Harsha & All - Ramana Maharshi

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

, "vicki" <viorica@z...> wrote:

> indeed,Judi.right.

>

****** Yes, go figure? People do everything rather than look to

themselves. They even march right into death itself with a grin on

their face, thinking that God in Heaven is gonna save them, without

ever bothering to stop and look to themselves. Is there any wonder why

Ramana's eyes always look wet.

 

Sheesh!

 

Judi

 

> > >

> > ********

> > Vicki, if those devotees really loved him they would do what he

> said

> > - drop all their games and enquire of themselves stead.

> >

> > Judi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Well put Danji. All structures

are the outcome and the workings of

the mind. They simply reflect the ongoing patterns of organizing

thought. Truth entirely transcends thoughts and the relative mind so

the foundation for all structures as something apart from the Truth

(Self) is seen to be non-existent.

Love

Harsha

Enjoying the resonation, my friend Harsha.

You are a force-ful guy!

Structures come from structures and

result in structures. They can be

broken down infinitely, or added

to infinitely.

Structureless truth can't be broken

down or added to.

All structurings

arise interdependently with each

other and with structureless reality.

Thus, all forms of organization

are transitional, all structures

are simultaneously empty and full.

Love,

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Tim and all,

>There seems to be some 'self deception' going on in the name of 'Bhakti' on

>the list.

>

>There are those ready to "defend" Sri Ramana Maharshi at every turn if

>"something bad" had been perceived said, even though he left the body years

>ago.

>

>Who the hell is being defended? A concept, an idea, a dead past. The idea

>that "Ramana Maharshi's teachings are correct for everyone" and are "a

>world teaching."

>

>There is something egoistic and improper about this. Sri Ramana Maharshi

>himself would certainly think so. He never stated himself a world teacher.

>

>I have permanently d to the mailing list as of

>this mailing. There is a religious aspect to this list.... it is no longer

>a Satsangha, it is a religion now. Soon there will be "Priests of

>Ramanaism." The rot has started.

---------------

 

I see nothing improper about Ramana's devotees being devoted to Ramana. :)

And I find his teachings of great value and beauty.

 

No one here has suggested that I should also devote myself to Ramana. Or

that I should not find other teachings of great value and beauty.

 

There is room for us all in this sangha. May we all walk in beauty.

 

Love,

Dharma

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

This is beautiful Dharma, and about says it all!

 

Love,

 

--Greg

 

At 02:23 PM 4/30/01 -0700, Dharma wrote:

>I see nothing improper about Ramana's devotees being devoted to Ramana. :)

>And I find his teachings of great value and beauty.

>

>No one here has suggested that I should also devote myself to Ramana. Or

>that I should not find other teachings of great value and beauty.

>

>There is room for us all in this sangha. May we all walk in beauty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...