Guest guest Posted May 17, 2001 Report Share Posted May 17, 2001 dear friends.... to get this you must go deep into all the traditions of non-duality....do not assume that we do not know what we know and know not what we are and are not doing.....st francis had st claire....st john had st theresa.....anthony had cleopatra.....king david had bathsheba....dante had beatrice.....bonny had cylde (ouch!)....the divine must have the mundane.....the sacred the profane.....non-duality is always arising.....are you aroused yet!......^^~~~~~ further up and further in, white wolfe the translucent edge “…when only cinder remains rub my ash over your body….” -Mirabai yogini, come with me there is too much of me for you, i am waiting, lusting just for you where sensuality turns what is into what is not where cool waters lapping refine hot sands wetly kissing all that is deep and dark in the earth arousing in all lustful things glistening warmth come to me, yogini there is not enough of you lost i am lost in my lusting self am i lost hidden beyond discovery beyond hidden deep inside the slanting shadows inside deep where returning sunlight sinking dies and returns deep within the silver arms of the forest within deep come to me, dark one there is more than enough of me for you i am nothing without your love and fire alone in the darkness within the sweating night drowning in the primal water beneath water dead in the holy darkness beyond the light thirsty for the salt on your skin that brings life there can never be too much of you for me dark one, come with me the less there is of me the more there is of you i become something more when i am in you come find me sitting at the disappearing edge i am musk dazzling in the drifting starlight darkly dancing in the silver moonshadows waiting for you to unleash the flood within me mirabai, take me into you the more you come to me the more i come in you come, your lover beckons you to come surrender come lie with him at the glistening invisible edge drift upon the indigo waves of smoking incense dancing naked inside shifting silver moonlight if you come to me burning i can come with you take me into you, mirabai and when the quicksilver moonlight quickens igniting our smoldering bower into a holy pyre we will arise, my beloved, from the flaming cinders gently rub sweet ashes each one over the other as two twisting flame upon flame twisting as one mira, come with mark and mark will come in you, mira drifting through the moon and beyond the stars coming together at the blue edge of all creation celebrating just you in me, my beloved, just me in you coming at the translucent edge of an awakening day! mark christopher valentine (may 16, 2001) Falling higher in love I climb you I ascend to your desire lavishing myself upon your humid flesh enraging your craving drawn toward a holy fire screaming in an exalted disclosure of bliss your gentle hardness within my reciprocal longing quenches my intolerable thirst for the unconditional deliverance of your virgin territories drowning in the cosmos of your eyes boundless passion arises rejoicing in the enervation of your reticence my senses quiver infused with your fragrant breath the intense collision with the infinite when two become one drenched in your exquisite effluence I descend to my surrender Falling higher in love I climb you Valentine 05.17.01 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2001 Report Share Posted May 17, 2001 , "White Wolfe" <valemar@m...> wrote: > dear friends.... > > to get this you must go deep into all the traditions of non-duality....do not assume that we do not know what we know and know not what we are and are not doing.....st francis had st claire....st john had st theresa.....anthony had cleopatra.....king david had bathsheba....dante had beatrice.....bonny had cylde (ouch!)....the divine must have the mundane.....the sacred the profane.....non-duality is always arising.....are you aroused Namaste All, Not really aroused, but I did think of Mirabai and Krishna. Mirabai achieved her moksha by pure Bhakti and merging with Krishna, who was her Ishtadevata or God Form. This is not a sensual love of course, but a Divine Union. Mita Smita Sundara Mukharavinda, Nacho Nandalala Nandalala, Nacho Nandalala Nandalala, Mira Key Prabhu Lala Nandalala. Dance in ecstasy, remembering the gentle smiling Lotus Face of the Darling son of Nanda, the Lord of Mira, Lord Krishna. Om Namah Sivaya....Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2001 Report Share Posted May 17, 2001 TONYsan... too bad you have not stubbed your toe lately...oh venerable wise one beyond all us puny mortals...after a while you will get tired of olympus and ride a tenderbolt down and make love to a dark one in secret....then will you discover of the bliss of humility?......we who have ridden the last wave many times do not care nor do we care if you approve or not approve of our love-making....we are always laughing (sssh...a secret....even at ourselves!).....^^~~~~~~ - Tony O'Clery <aoclery <> Thursday, May 17, 2001 4:27 PM Re: more poetry between mark & mira > , "White Wolfe" <valemar@m...> wrote: > > dear friends.... > > > > to get this you must go deep into all the traditions of > non-duality....do not assume that we do not know what we know and know > not what we are and are not doing.....st francis had st claire....st > john had st theresa.....anthony had cleopatra.....king david had > bathsheba....dante had beatrice.....bonny had cylde (ouch!)....the > divine must have the mundane.....the sacred the > profane.....non-duality is always arising.....are you aroused > > Namaste All, > > Not really aroused, but I did think of Mirabai and Krishna. Mirabai > achieved her moksha by pure Bhakti and merging with Krishna, who was > her Ishtadevata or God Form. This is not a sensual love of course, but > a Divine Union. > > Mita Smita Sundara Mukharavinda, Nacho Nandalala Nandalala, > Nacho Nandalala Nandalala, > Mira Key Prabhu Lala Nandalala. > > Dance in ecstasy, remembering the gentle smiling Lotus Face of the > Darling son of Nanda, the Lord of Mira, Lord Krishna. > > > Om Namah Sivaya....Tony. > > > /join > > > > > > All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights, perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the Truth of Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It Self. Welcome all to a. > > > > Your use of is subject to > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2001 Report Share Posted May 17, 2001 , "White Wolfe" <valemar@m...> wrote: > dear friends.... > > to get this you must go deep into all the traditions of non-duality....do not assume that we do not know what we know and know not what we are and are not doing.....st francis had st claire....st john had st theresa.....anthony had cleopatra.....king david had bathsheba....dante had beatrice.....bonny had cylde (ouch!)....the divine must have the mundane.....the sacred the profane.....non-duality is always arising.....are you aroused yet!......^^~~~~~ > ******* No, but if you start talking Ralph and Alice, George and Gracie, Desi and Lucy, Fred and Wilma, etc., I get real excited. :-) lol Judi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2001 Report Share Posted May 17, 2001 same thing exactly....the beloved has an infinite number of masks with which to fool us foolish mortals.....^^~~~ > > dear friends.... > > > > to get this you must go deep into all the traditions of > non-duality....do not assume that we do not know what we know and know > not what we are and are not doing.....st francis had st claire....st > john had st theresa.....anthony had cleopatra.....king david had > bathsheba....dante had beatrice.....bonny had cylde (ouch!)....the > divine must have the mundane.....the sacred the > profane.....non-duality is always arising.....are you aroused > yet!......^^~~~~~ > > > ******* > No, but if you start talking Ralph and Alice, George and Gracie, > Desi and Lucy, Fred and Wilma, etc., I get real excited. :-) lol > > Judi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2001 Report Share Posted May 17, 2001 , "White Wolfe" <valemar@m...> wrote: > same thing exactly....the beloved has an infinite number of masks with which > to fool us foolish mortals.....^^~~~ > ****** Speak for yourself! :-) It's all wonderfully amusing to me. Judi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2001 Report Share Posted May 18, 2001 Tony: > Not really aroused, but I did think of Mirabai and Krishna. Mirabai achieved her moksha by pure Bhakti and merging with Krishna, who was her Ishtadevata or God Form. This is not a sensual love of course, but a Divine Union. Truly Tony, please take no offense, but what is the difference? Distinctions are as real as you believe them to be. Splitting up love between divine love and mundane love, is creating a duality where there is none. There is only love, and its divinity is as mundane as its profanity is divine. The merging of which you speak, is the dance of the creator with itself, and this dance has no predetermined choreography. It is the heartbeat of creation, were the lover merges into the beloved, in its myriad ways through its myriad forms. Once the dance and the merging are understood, there are infinte rhythms to enjoy and dance to. Love, Mira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.