Attachment to Tony The Cing :-) was Attachment Tao Te Ching)

[Guest guest]

, "Wim Borsboom" <aurasphere@h...> wrote:

> Dear Tony,

>

> You wrote:

> > I actually thought all these *well read* people...

>

> Is that how you catagorize people?

>

> > had a *head* start on me!!

>

> Is that how you saw and still define some?

>

> > However it is the mind and *getting above the mind* through

> meditations

> > burns up the samskaras of desire/aversion.

>

> "getting above the mind"?

> Is for you the mind then still a fightable *reality*?

> By trying to get above aren't you assigning reality to it?

> Are you by any chance fighting delusion with illusion?

> Are you by any chance fighting fire by dowsing it with gasoline?

>

> > Most of the comments on here are about the mind,

>

> When that is what you think, than that is what you think...

>

> > some seem to forget

>

> What if some just forget about it...?

> Better not to feed a fire with hot air...

>

> > the whole process is getting above it and purifying the buddhi

>

> Buddhi needs no purification

> And why clinging to dirt...?

>

> Love, Wim

>

> PS.

> Are you my attachment?

> I'm letting go.

>

> Are we your attachment?

> Will you let go?

 

Namaste Wim,

 

The problem lies with my ability to express myself. I know what I mean

when I say above the mind and things like that. I mean it doesn't

exist at all and never did. However like the circumlocutive addicts on

NDS, ( they are the biggest bunch of people into the mind, you will

ever find and they say they are non dual),you are picking me up on my

expression. I do find some difficulty sometimes in expressing myself o

n these subjects. You will just have to ask me what I really mean

before you correct me to your way of thinking.

 

The mind is just a bundle of thoughts, relatively, absolutely they

don't exist........ONS...Tony