Would the real K stand up!!

[Guest guest]

Namaste All, Glo, Dharma, Mirror, Wim et al,

 

Is the real K the one with 7 cakras, 10 cakras or is it 14 cakras. Is

it 300,000 nadis, 7oo,ooo nadis or infinite nadis????as some aver?

 

My point which nobody seems to take up is that it is all conceptual

and interpretive. Speaking within samsara that is.

 

I see non-dualists talking about K etc. There is no difference between

the dualistic worship of a fundamentalist with god and gods etc, and

worshippers of K. K and Sakti are the Ishtadevatas!!!!It is dualistic

in the extreme. Are the Chinese 'realised ones' wrong because they

have more and different cakras? or any other group other than the

believers in 7. Yes that is it, it is a belief system, some groups

have to tabulate and measure the immeasurable.

 

It is my 'belief', there is more prana activity behind endocrine

transducers for the obvious glandular/hormonic reasons.

 

Whether one calls the subtle sheaths bodies etc doesn't really matter,

there is an energy constantly changing. There are currents, these are

the channels nadis etc. A constantly changing mind through the three

gunas. A certain amount of cleansing purification or refining the

vibrations is necessary for the jiva to appreciate more subtle ideas

like ahimsa etc.

 

My point is that sticking religiously to one belief about K, is

fundamentalism, and scripturism. It is really a method of

concentration, and any will do. It is still only preparatory!!!!

 

The K idea doesn't achieve moksha for it is in material illusory

energy. It is worshipping the physical, a more refined physical but

material all the same. It is all in the Mahat!!or Mind.

 

Om Namah Sivaya......Tony.