Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Hi Joyce, I joined this list yesterday upon hearing that Harsha had asked the members speaking about their experiences with me. I make Enlightenment available in dialogue meetings, over the phone, on the Net -- wherever. I sought for 30 years, and was practising yoga by my accord at the age of 5, around that age my cousin decided to be vegetarian! After following seriously following several teachers only to see their organisations explode, and disappear, and seeing many visiting teachers, I concluded that enlightenment did not exist. When I did Awaken - at 5am in the morning, I actually said "I think I am enlightened" and my partner, a long time student of the late Jean Klein, said "I thought you were going to say something like that." It's all a bit of a mystery and its on-going. Others have woken up around me, and there are plenty of stories about people's strange-but- true experiences. For me, it's not surprising anymore because reality is not fixed. It's just a bit of mystery, i.e. why this is all happening. I don't fit any orthodox categories, but I'd say I am in the Ramana Maharshi line, as long as we recognise that it doesn't exist! Orthodoxy, and advaitic divisions, have been created by the unenlightened. Teachers don't fit into categories. For example, some will say "You can't say 'I am enlightened' because that means that there is someone there to be enlightened". But you can say it. Here, look --> I am enlightened! And look, I still am!! Lots of love, dave > Sorry, Dave, I have no idea who you are. I'm always happy to hear about > people's experiences. And if your life will make Awakening available to me I > shall be delighted. Even if you cannot make this avaliable to me I'm still > happy to meet you. > > Joyce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 daveoshana [daveoshana] Saturday, June 09, 2001 7:50 AM Re: Dave Oshana Hi Joyce, I joined this list yesterday upon hearing that Harsha had asked the members speaking about their experiences with me. I make Enlightenment available in dialogue meetings, over the phone, on the Net -- wherever. _______________ Thanks Dave and welcome to the list. Yes, my powers are immense. My mere mention of someone's name even in passing makes them run here and speak of their enlightenment and how they can awaken others. Our last meeting was not too long ago at NDS where I suggested that your practice of subscribing people to your list without their permission was unethical. Is this now in your past or does that still continue? Please clarify and comment. It was something the logic of which was not fully grasped by me. I would appreciate your current views on the ethics of that matter and discussing it before proceeding. I mean are we all in danger of having our e-mail addresses having to take another ride. I realize that every guru and teacher must find its flock somewhere Dave. Here, we eat enlightenment for breakfast and have gurus for lunch and what we do for dinner you will have to find out. This is a mature community. We don't give a hoot about enlightenment. Being straight forward and having good manners is a must. Love Harsha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 On 6/9/01 at 8:16 AM Harsha wrote: [...] ºThis is a mature community. We don't give a hoot about enlightenment. Being ºstraight forward and having good manners is a must. º ºLove ºHarsha Dear Harsha, Thanks a lot of the humor... That comment certainly made my day! Love, Jan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Hi Dave, >I joined this list yesterday upon hearing that Harsha had asked the >members speaking about their experiences with me. Well, let's be exact about this. Harsha did not ask you to come here, as I'm sure you know. What he said was: >This is the same guy who forcibly d my e-mail address and that >of many others to his list not too long ago and there was a discussion on >that on NDS. I am not questioning Dave's enlightenment or sense of humor >or anything, but certainly his judgment. Since we all make mistakes, I >don't hold that against him. On the other hand, I think you have given >him enough of a plug now on this list in several posts. If Dave wants to >join here and engage in a discussion, he is welcome like everyone else. > Otherwise please refrain from any more glorification of Dave here. ------ >I make Enlightenment available in dialogue meetings, over the phone, >on the Net -- wherever. That easy, huh? That is truly amazing! Must be a new dispensation. Hallelujah!! >I sought for 30 years, and was practising yoga by my accord at the >age of 5, It took you 30 years to get to the age of 5?? >around that age my cousin decided to be vegetarian! Well, obviously something wasn't working right. >When I did Awaken - at 5am in the morning, I actually said "I think I >am enlightened" Amazing!! And so original! >I don't fit any orthodox categories, but I'd say I am in the Ramana >Maharshi line, I am not aware of Ramana offering instant Enlightenment in dialogue meetings, by phone, any way, any how... > as long as we recognise that it doesn't exist! And that neatly cancels out the first part of your sentence. >Orthodoxy, and advaitic divisions What is an advaitic division?? >, have been created by the >unenlightened. Teachers don't fit into categories. You do, honey. >For example, some will say "You can't say 'I am enlightened' because >that means that there is someone there to be enlightened". > >But you can say it. Here, look --> I am enlightened! Absolutely amazing! >And look, I still am!! Wow! Amazinger and amazinger! Welcome to our sangha! Love, Dharma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Hi Joyce, I joined this list yesterday upon hearing that Harsha had asked the members speaking about their experiences with me. Hi Dave....nice to meet you. Interesting to meet someone that others speak about. Yum, Yum. I make Enlightenment available in dialogue meetings, over the phone, O good. Now I know where to to find Enlightenment and who can make it available to me, on the Net, over the phone is always good -- wherever. I have a short attention span so darshan must be very short and very sweet. _______________ Thanks Dave and welcome to the list. Yes, my powers are immense. My mere mention of someone's name even in passing makes them run here and speak of their enlightenment and how they can awaken others. Isn't that great, aye. Dave, being on of ten thousand things can enlighten me and Im also waiting for the other 9,999 to arrive on list. I would appreciate your current views Asking for anyone's 'views' seems risky. It is hard to stop them once they get started. I realize that every guru and teacher must find its flock somewhere Dave. O great, a flock! Does this mean I get to be a flockette? One gets well and truly flocked? This is a mature community. Well......... We don't give a hoot about enlightenment. Small hoot that other may find *it* if they wants *it*. Being straight forward and having good manners is a must. Staying cool is good. I still don't know who 'Dave' is? I don't mean ultimately just ordinary will do. Love, Joyce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 >>This is a mature community. We don't give a hoot about enlightenment. Being straight forward and having good manners is a must. Love Harsha >Dear Harsha, Thanks a lot of the humor... That comment certainly made my day! Love, Jan And I'll drink to that!!! LOL!!! Mira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 >I don't fit any orthodox categories, but I'd say I am in the Ramana Maharshi line, I am not aware of Ramana offering instant Enlightenment in dialogue meetings, by phone, any way, any how... LOLOLOLOL!!!! Dharmaaaaaa!!!!! Never heard of the Maharshi-line? You get long distance enlightenment phonecalls for "no-thing". Doesn't get any cheaper than that!! Love and laughter, Mira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Dear Dave Harsha wrote: > This is a mature community. We don't give a hoot about enlightenment. > Being straight forward and having good manners is a must. You wrote: > I actually said "I think I am enlightened" and my partner,<snip>, > said "I thought you were going to say something like that." I'm the only one on this list who professes to be enlightened, hmmm, now I see my error because I did not think I was... I'm thinking about it now... and you know what it already feels better... Dave, man... that was indeed super fast... Do you think that thoughts go with the speed of light...? Fantastic, I just think that Tony is enlightened (you don't know yet) and he is, wow! Is it important for him to think so too, or can we dispense with that. Do I need to phone him or will you do that? That is really good about Tony, because we were looking for a replacement for him and I think you fit the bill... at least I think so. Love Dave, Wim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 , daveoshana wrote: > Hi Joyce, > > I joined this list yesterday upon hearing that Harsha had asked the > members speaking about their experiences with me. > > I make Enlightenment available in dialogue meetings, over the phone, > on the Net -- wherever. > > I sought for 30 years, and was practising yoga by my accord at the > age of 5, around that age my cousin decided to be vegetarian! > > After following seriously following several teachers only to see > their organisations explode, and disappear, and seeing many visiting > teachers, I concluded that enlightenment did not exist. > > When I did Awaken - at 5am in the morning, I actually said "I think I > am enlightened" and my partner, a long time student of the late Jean > Klein, said "I thought you were going to say something like that." > > It's all a bit of a mystery and its on-going. Others have woken up > around me, and there are plenty of stories about people's strange-but- > true experiences. For me, it's not surprising anymore because > reality is not fixed. It's just a bit of mystery, i.e. why this is > all happening. > > I don't fit any orthodox categories, but I'd say I am in the Ramana > Maharshi line, as long as we recognise that it doesn't exist! > > Orthodoxy, and advaitic divisions, have been created by the > unenlightened. Teachers don't fit into categories. > > For example, some will say "You can't say 'I am enlightened' because > that means that there is someone there to be enlightened". > > But you can say it. Here, look --> I am enlightened! > > And look, I still am!! > > Lots of love, > > dave > > > Sorry, Dave, I have no idea who you are. I'm always happy to hear > about > > people's experiences. And if your life will make Awakening > available to me I > > shall be delighted. Even if you cannot make this avaliable to me > I'm still > > happy to meet you. > > > > Joyce Namaste All, Well we are honoured to have two proclaimed 'enlightened beings' on here now. Wim and Dave!!!It should be interesting as to finding out why these 'realised souls' are bothering so much with the internet, and a desire for chinese food. Dave isn't an ordinary one even, he is in the line of Ramana Maharshi. That's the problem without a sadhana and a science one gets to the plane of laya and thinks one is awakened. Or has a momentarily samadhi whilst walking down the street, it happens. It happens all the time between thoughts anyway. I was enlightended before 5 am in the morning but I don't KNOW it yet. Ahh!! well after you with the lithium. ONS.....Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 , "Harsha" <harsha-hkl@h...> wrote: > > daveoshana [daveoshana] > Saturday, June 09, 2001 7:50 AM > > Re: Dave Oshana > > > Hi Joyce, > > I joined this list yesterday upon hearing that Harsha had asked the > members speaking about their experiences with me. > > I make Enlightenment available in dialogue meetings, over the phone, > on the Net -- wherever. > _______________ > Thanks Dave and welcome to the list. Yes, my powers are immense. My mere > mention of someone's name even in passing makes them run here and speak of > their enlightenment and how they can awaken others. > > Our last meeting was not too long ago at NDS where I suggested that your > practice of subscribing people to your list without their permission was > unethical. Is this now in your past or does that still continue? Please > clarify and comment. It was something the logic of which was not fully > grasped by me. I would appreciate your current views on the ethics of that > matter and discussing it before proceeding. I mean are we all in danger of > having our e-mail addresses having to take another ride. > > I realize that every guru and teacher must find its flock somewhere Dave. > Here, we eat enlightenment for breakfast and have gurus for lunch and what > we do for dinner you will have to find out. > > This is a mature community. We don't give a hoot about enlightenment. Being > straight forward and having good manners is a must. > > Love > Harsha Namaste All, Dave, I prefer not to use the phone could you please send enlightenment over the internet, I will forward it on to my mailing lists.....ONS..Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Dear Harsha, You wrote: Yes, my powers are immense. My mere mention of someone's name even in passing makes them run here and speak of their enlightenment and how they can awaken others. I would like to add my personal testimonial to this fact. Your powers are not to be underestimated, Harsha. When you mentioned my name, I was impelled to run over here and speak of my sudden realization of being nothing special. And I found that all around me, people suddenly are losing track of their accomplishments. I know I am indeed nothing special, because people ignore me wherever I go! I also realized that I have the power to make people nothing special. I don't even have to do anything. See? Isn't that amazing? (snip) I realize that every guru and teacher must find its flock somewhere Dave. Here, we eat enlightenment for breakfast and have gurus for lunch and what we do for dinner you will have to find out. Burp? And have Tony inhale and comment about the validity of the contents of lunch? I'm not sure whether Tony approved of the diet you suggest Harsha, although I find it has definite merits ... This is a mature community. We don't give a hoot about enlightenment. Being straight forward and having good manners is a must. Well, I greet the host with a cyber-smile. Hope that's considered good manners ... Love, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Dear Joyce -- I realize that every guru and teacher must find its flock somewhere Dave. J: O great, a flock! Does this mean I get to be a flockette? One gets well and truly flocked? I don't need a flock, just ewe ;-) Baaaaad, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 On 6/9/01 at 5:52 PM Tony O'Clery wrote: [...] ºNamaste All, º ºWell we are honoured to have two proclaimed 'enlightened beings' on ºhere now. Wim and Dave!!!It should be interesting as to finding out ºwhy these 'realised souls' are bothering so much with the internet, ºand a desire for chinese food. Dave isn't an ordinary one even, he is ºin the line of Ramana Maharshi. The cat here is enlightened too and that's why she is offered smoked goat cheese... But like Ramana in his "early" years, she refuses to talk and doesn't want to write.... At least she can teach in silence ) º ºThat's the problem without a sadhana and a science one gets to the ºplane of laya and thinks one is awakened. Or has a momentarily samadhi ºwhilst walking down the street, it happens. It happens all the time ºbetween thoughts anyway. What happens? Nothing really happens which isn't the same and yet is... º ºI was enlightended before 5 am in the morning but I don't KNOW it yet. How can you write down what you don't know yet? Drugs? º ºAhh!! well after you with the lithium. I thought so... "They" say, a few castor beans work great too ) And there are plenty in the garden here... Joy and laughter, Jan º ºONS.....Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 andrew: No sweat Tony, I am actually the only enlightened one there ever was. love, nobody oh oh.... now we have two enlightened nobodies on the list. dan and andrew..... and yet they say they are the only one there ever was... dan&drew ...? :-) Mira I'm disqualifying myself immediately. Love, Dan ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Aw... Dear Tony... You still do not read too well do you? Love, Wim > Well we are honoured to have two proclaimed 'enlightened beings' on > here now. Wim and Dave!!!It should be interesting as to finding out > why these 'realised souls' are bothering so much with the internet, > and a desire for chinese food. Dave isn't an ordinary one even, he is > in the line of Ramana Maharshi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 At 02:51 PM 6/9/01 -0700, you wrote: Dear Mira and Joyce Mira wrote: > oh oh.... > now we have two enlightened nobodies on the list. Two enlightened somebodies plus two enlightened nobodies equals zero enlightened beings... Joyce can you mark this? I don't know if it is correct, but I think it is. Love, Wim Wim-math be good math. Zeroing in on truth, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2001 Report Share Posted June 12, 2001 Hi Harsha, > Our last meeting was not too long ago at NDS where I suggested that your > practice of subscribing people to your list without their permission was > unethical. Is this now in your past or does that still continue? Please > clarify and comment. It was something the logic of which was not fully > grasped by me. I would appreciate your current views on the ethics of that > matter and discussing it before proceeding. Glad you asked - again and again. At the moment there are roughly 7,000 people on my list, 99% have been 'forcibly d'. We did it to save their souls..it was a small price to pay...and we don't even send them anything!!! Er...actually since that fateful day when you were d in error instead of being merely invited to "eat enlightenment for breakfast" - assuming you had not already had your daily fill - no- one else has had the privelege! I don't think it was 'recent'..wasn't it last year? > I realize that every guru and teacher must find its flock somewhere Dave. > Here, we eat enlightenment for breakfast and have gurus for lunch and what > we do for dinner you will have to find out. thank you > > This is a mature community. We don't give a hoot about enlightenment. Not sure what you mean here >Being straight forward and having good manners is a must. I agree with you love dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2001 Report Share Posted June 12, 2001 Hi Dave, >>Harsha: >> Our last meeting was not too long ago at NDS where I suggested that >your >> practice of subscribing people to your list without their >permission was >> unethical. Is this now in your past or does that still continue? >snip< > >Dave: >Glad you asked - again and again. At the moment there are roughly >7,000 people on my list, 99% have been 'forcibly d'. Yes, that's unethical... and on a grand scale! >We did >it to save their souls. That's no excuse... but it does tell a lot about you. It takes a lot of nerve - and arrogance - to assume that you know those 7,000 people needed their souls saved... and that you could do it by forcibly subscribing them to your list. >it was a small price to pay... For whom? For them? You're assuming you know what price they should pay? For what you think they should have? >and we don't >even send them anything!!! Just putting their names on your list was enough to save their souls?? If one s, does he lose his soul again? )) >Er...actually since that fateful day when you were d in >error instead of being merely invited to "eat enlightenment for >breakfast" - assuming you had not already had your daily fill - no- >one else has had the privelege! I don't think it was 'recent'..wasn't >it last year? You mean you chose Harsha for enlightenment on the last day of the calling of the 7,000??? And now the rolls are closed? Was 7,000 the magic number? >snip< >>Being straight forward and having good manners is a must. > >I agree with you You are welcome here, Dave... but don't try to forcibly save us. ) Not good manners, you know. Love, Dharma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2001 Report Share Posted June 12, 2001 , Dharma <deva@L...> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > >>Harsha: > >> Our last meeting was not too long ago at NDS where I suggested that > >your > >> practice of subscribing people to your list without their > >permission was > >> unethical. Is this now in your past or does that still continue? > >snip< > > > >Dave: > >Glad you asked - again and again. At the moment there are roughly > >7,000 people on my list, 99% have been 'forcibly d'. > > Yes, that's unethical... and on a grand scale! > > >We did > >it to save their souls. > > That's no excuse... but it does tell a lot about you. > > It takes a lot of nerve - and arrogance - to assume that you know those > 7,000 people needed their souls saved... and that you could do it by > forcibly subscribing them to your list. It was a joke Dharma!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2001 Report Share Posted June 12, 2001 At 09:01 PM 6/12/01 +0000, you wrote: , Dharma <deva@L...> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > >>Harsha: > >> Our last meeting was not too long ago at NDS where I suggested that > >your > >> practice of subscribing people to your list without their > >permission was > >> unethical. Is this now in your past or does that still continue? > >snip< > > > >Dave: > >Glad you asked - again and again. At the moment there are roughly > >7,000 people on my list, 99% have been 'forcibly d'. > > Yes, that's unethical... and on a grand scale! > > >We did > >it to save their souls. > > That's no excuse... but it does tell a lot about you. > > It takes a lot of nerve - and arrogance - to assume that you know those > 7,000 people needed their souls saved... and that you could do it by > forcibly subscribing them to your list. It was a joke Dharma!!! Yes, but it was no joke when they forcibly d me to this karma-ridden polluted pebble they call a "world". Stop the world, I want to get off! Humorously, though, the joke's on them. I can be in two places at once ;-) Un, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.