Dharma, Chris, and others' brain filters

[Guest guest]

Dear Dharma and Chris,

>Gnosis is not possible whilst

understanding is desired through the filters

>of perception of other people's brains.

I haven't the foggiest idea what you mean. Could you try

again?

Sometimes, rearranging the word order using intuition has

been helpful to me in deciphering otherwise perplexing

Qabalistic puzzles.

In this case, I get: Understanding is gnosis, but not possible if

desire

filters perception through other people's brains.

Has the sound of a real unpleasant soup --

what's left after all that filtering, and

what could it taste like?

Or, if not a soup, possibly a movie:

"The Thing That Had Two Many Brains" ...

Or did Steve Martin already do that one?

Love,

Dan

>Gnosis is not possible

whilst understanding is desired...

That much of it makes sense...

but how does one desire (understanding or anything else) through the

filter

of perception of other people's brains?

In fact, what the heck does this mean??

>the filter of perception of other people's brains?

Love,

Dharma

[Guest guest]

Hi Dan,

>>>Gnosis is not possible whilst

>>understanding is desired through the filters

>>>of perception of other people's brains.

>>

>>I haven't the foggiest idea what you mean. Could you try

>>again?

>

> Sometimes, rearranging the word order using intuition has been helpful

>to me in deciphering otherwise perplexing Qabalistic puzzles. In this

>case, I get: Understanding is gnosis, but not possible if desire

>filters perception through other people's brains. Has the sound of a real

>unpleasant soup -- what's left after all that filtering, and what

>could it taste like?

 

Brain soup. Nope, that's sure not gnosis.

 

Love,

Dharma

[Guest guest]

Brain soup. Nope, that's

sure not gnosis.

Love,

Dharma

Indeed.

I think traditionally, it's

served in a skull ...

Not for the squeamish ... ;-)

But then, reality isn't ... ;-)

Love,

Dan