Guest guest Posted June 14, 2001 Report Share Posted June 14, 2001 Hi Vicki and all, >Q: > Is the Buddhist view, that there is no continuous > entity answering to the ideas of the individual soul, > correct or not? Is this consistent with the Hindu > notion of a reincarnating ego? Is the soul a > continuous entity which reincarnates again and again, > > according to the Hindu doctrine, or is it a mere mass > > of mental tendencies- samskaras? > >Ramana : > The real Self is continuous and unaffected. The > reincarnating ego belongs to the lower plane, namely, > thought. It is transcended by Self-realisation. > > > Reincarnations are due to a spurious offshoot. These words "spurious offshoot" are not clear to me. Does anyone know what the original words were or in what other way they have been translated? Thanks, Dharma > Therefore they are denied by the Buddhists. The > present state of ignorance is due to the > identification of consciousness [chit] with the > insentient [jada] body. > >from Be As You Are Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2001 Report Share Posted June 14, 2001 The insentient body with which "consciousness" identifies, is a thought construct. Thus, thoughts are insentient. Even more subtle than identification with "the body" is the identification with thought (which constructs the image 'body'). As thought is insentient, the entire structure is false, which is erected by thought in service of the false identification of "consciousness" with thought. (Structure = time, religion, science, art, history, human life, etc.) With no identification with thought, any thought may come or go, but no thought "binds." There is nowhere to go or stay, as any place to go or stay is thought-based. Namaste, Dan Q: Is the Buddhist view, that there is no continuous entity answering to the ideas of the individual soul, correct or not? Is this consistent with the Hindu notion of a reincarnating ego? Is the soul a continuous entity which reincarnates again and again, according to the Hindu doctrine, or is it a mere mass of mental tendencies- samskaras? Ramana : The real Self is continuous and unaffected. The reincarnating ego belongs to the lower plane, namely, thought. It is transcended by Self-realisation. Reincarnations are due to a spurious offshoot. Therefore they are denied by the Buddhists. The present state of ignorance is due to the identification of consciousness [chit] with the insentient [jada] body. from Be As You Are Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more. http://buzz./ Sponsor /join All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights, perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the Truth of Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It Self. Welcome all to a. Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2001 Report Share Posted June 14, 2001 Yes, that's great Dan. There are a few people are two other lists currently grappling with this. In Theravada- the focus for understanding is on the point of contact of 'I' and sight, sound etc.The twelve links,Dependent Origination. Very little reference to anything prior to this. And not much public teaching on recognition of the nature of mind, although I have found a few references (pure mind) with the practices. Understanding emptiness has to include understanding, insight into, Dependent Origination and visa versa. In Dzogchen, the twelve links (as an explanation of the causes of cyclic life) starts with: "The beginningless nature of mind is empty, clear and unobstructed, But its nature is not recognized" Then follows the arising, or stirring of mental creations and the production of dualistic appearances. Similar in expression as Thera. So -this'no-where to go or to stay' would you also express as the 'beginningless nature of mind'? At least as a teaching device? In Buddhist practice, the point of recognition of this is important. Love, Joyce The insentient body with which "consciousness" identifies, is a thought construct. Thus, thoughts are insentient. Even more subtle than identification with "the body" is the identification with thought (which constructs the image 'body'). As thought is insentient, the entire structure is false, which is erected by thought in service of the false identification of "consciousness" with thought. (Structure = time, religion, science, art, history, human life, etc.) With no identification with thought, any thought may come or go, but no thought "binds." There is nowhere to go or stay, as any place to go or stay is thought-based. Namaste, Dan Q: Is the Buddhist view, that there is no continuous entity answering to the ideas of the individual soul, correct or not? Is this consistent with the Hindu notion of a reincarnating ego? Is the soul a continuous entity which reincarnates again and again, according to the Hindu doctrine, or is it a mere mass of mental tendencies- samskaras? Ramana : The real Self is continuous and unaffected. The reincarnating ego belongs to the lower plane, namely, thought. It is transcended by Self-realisation. Reincarnations are due to a spurious offshoot. Therefore they are denied by the Buddhists. The present state of ignorance is due to the identification of consciousness [chit] with the insentient [jada] body. from Be As You Are Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more. http://buzz./ Sponsor <http://rd./M=201621.1455087.3033008.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700060955:N/A=615447/R=2/*http://store./cgi-bin/clink?ydomains+merchant-ad:dmad/M=201621.1455087.3033008.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700060955:N/A=615447/R=3/992533839+http://domains./> /join All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights, perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the Truth of Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It Self. Welcome all to a. Terms of Service <> . Sponsor Click for Details <http://rd./M=168002.1477935.3051340.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700060955:N/A=624150/*http://mojofarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/990-1736-1039-2?bn=LikeManDVD468> /join All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights, perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the Truth of Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It Self. Welcome all to a. Terms of Service <> . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2001 Report Share Posted June 14, 2001 At 03:37 PM 6/14/01 -0400, you wrote: >Yes, that's great Dan. There are a few people are two other lists >currently grappling with this. > >In Theravada- the focus for understanding is on the point of contact of >'I' and sight, sound etc.The twelve links,Dependent Origination. Very >little reference to anything prior to this. And not much public teaching >on recognition of the nature of mind, although I have found a few >references (pure mind) with the practices. Understanding emptiness has to >include understanding, insight into, Dependent Origination and visa versa. > >In Dzogchen, the twelve links (as an explanation of the causes of cyclic >life) starts with: > >"The beginningless nature of mind is empty, clear and unobstructed, >But its nature is not recognized" > >Then follows the arising, or stirring of mental creations and the >production of dualistic appearances. Similar in expression as Thera. > >So -this'no-where to go or to stay' would you also express as the >'beginningless nature of mind'? At least as a teaching device? Hi Joyce -- Probably as "the end of mind" or "where mind can't grasp anything" Could say "beginningless" ... but why "nature of mind" If there's no beginning, how did it get defined as mind, or as having a nature? ;-) Beginningless Love, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2001 Report Share Posted June 14, 2001 , Daniel Berkow <berkowd@u...> wrote: > At 03:37 PM 6/14/01 -0400, you wrote: > >Yes, that's great Dan. There are a few people are two other lists > >currently grappling with this. > Dan Namaste All, Why do people have to grapple and intellectualise illusion? Why not just get over it? Do what you have to do whilst your in it, but try to accept it doesn't exist, never did......ONS....Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2001 Report Share Posted June 15, 2001 Namaste All, Why do people have to grapple and intellectualise illusion? Why not just get over it? Do what you have to do whilst your in it, but try to accept it doesn't exist, never did......ONS....Tony. Dear Tony, There's nothing to get over. There's no one in it, to get out of it. How can an illusion accept that an illusion doesn't exist? Love, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2001 Report Share Posted June 15, 2001 , Daniel Berkow <berkowd@u...> wrote: > > >Namaste All, > > > >Why do people have to grapple and intellectualise illusion? Why not > >just get over it? Do what you have to do whilst your in it, but try to > >accept it doesn't exist, never did......ONS....Tony. > > Dear Tony, > > There's nothing to get over. > There's no one in it, to get > out of it. > How can an illusion accept > that an illusion doesn't exist? > > Love, > Dan Namaste Dan, One has to use a thorn to remove a thorn, or the thorn stays in..ONS..Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2001 Report Share Posted June 15, 2001 Namaste Dan, One has to use a thorn to remove a thorn, or the thorn stays in..ONS..Tony. If one knows this, why would one stick a thorn in his own flesh, and then set about finding a thorn to remove it? Love, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2001 Report Share Posted June 15, 2001 , Daniel Berkow <berkowd@u...> wrote: > > >Namaste Dan, > > > >One has to use a thorn to remove a thorn, or the thorn stays > >in..ONS..Tony. > > If one knows this, why would > one stick a thorn in his own > flesh, and then set about > finding a thorn to remove it? > > Love, > Dan Namaste Dan, That of course is the ultimate question, and the answer is it didn't happen......ONS....Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.