Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

reincarnation - 1

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi Vicki and all,

>Q:

> Is the Buddhist view, that there is no continuous

> entity answering to the ideas of the individual soul,

> correct or not? Is this consistent with the Hindu

> notion of a reincarnating ego? Is the soul a

> continuous entity which reincarnates again and again,

>

> according to the Hindu doctrine, or is it a mere mass

>

> of mental tendencies- samskaras?

>

>Ramana :

> The real Self is continuous and unaffected. The

> reincarnating ego belongs to the lower plane, namely,

> thought. It is transcended by Self-realisation.

>

>

> Reincarnations are due to a spurious offshoot.

 

These words "spurious offshoot" are not clear to me. Does anyone know what

the original words were or in what other way they have been translated?

 

Thanks,

Dharma

> Therefore they are denied by the Buddhists. The

> present state of ignorance is due to the

> identification of consciousness [chit] with the

> insentient [jada] body.

>

>from Be As You Are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The insentient body with which "consciousness"

identifies, is a thought construct.

Thus, thoughts are insentient.

Even more subtle than identification with

"the body" is the identification with thought

(which constructs the image 'body').

As thought is insentient, the entire

structure is false, which is

erected by thought in service

of the false identification of

"consciousness"

with thought. (Structure = time, religion,

science, art, history, human life, etc.)

With no identification with thought, any thought

may come or go, but no thought "binds."

There is nowhere to go or stay, as any place

to go or stay is thought-based.

Namaste,

Dan

Q:

Is the Buddhist view, that there is no continuous

entity answering to the ideas of the individual soul,

correct or not? Is this consistent with the Hindu

notion of a reincarnating ego? Is the soul a

continuous entity which reincarnates again and again,

according to the Hindu doctrine, or is it a mere mass

of mental tendencies- samskaras?

Ramana :

The real Self is continuous and unaffected. The

reincarnating ego belongs to the lower plane, namely,

thought. It is transcended by Self-realisation.

Reincarnations are due to a spurious offshoot.

Therefore they are denied by the Buddhists. The

present state of ignorance is due to the

identification of consciousness [chit] with the

insentient [jada] body.

from Be As You Are

 

 

Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.

http://buzz./

 

Sponsor

/join

 

All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights,

perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and

subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not

different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of the

nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always

Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart to

be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the Truth of

Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It Self. Welcome

all to a.

Your use of is subject to the

Terms of

Service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yes, that's great Dan. There are a few people are two other lists

currently grappling with this.

In Theravada- the focus for understanding is on the point of contact

of 'I' and sight, sound etc.The twelve links,Dependent Origination.

Very little reference to anything prior to this. And not much public

teaching on recognition of the nature of mind, although I have found

a few references (pure mind) with the practices. Understanding

emptiness has to include understanding, insight into, Dependent

Origination and visa versa.

In Dzogchen, the twelve links (as an explanation of the causes of cyclic life) starts with:

"The beginningless nature of mind is empty, clear and unobstructed,

But its nature is not recognized"

Then follows the arising, or stirring of mental creations and the

production of dualistic appearances. Similar in expression as Thera.

So -this'no-where to go or to stay' would you also express as the

'beginningless nature of mind'? At least as a teaching device?

In Buddhist practice, the point of recognition of this is important.

Love,

Joyce

The insentient body with which "consciousness"

identifies, is a thought construct.

Thus, thoughts are insentient.

Even more subtle than identification with

"the body" is the identification with thought

(which constructs the image 'body').

As thought is insentient, the entire

structure is false, which is

erected by thought in service

of the false identification of "consciousness"

with thought. (Structure = time, religion,

science, art, history, human life, etc.)

With no identification with thought, any thought

may come or go, but no thought "binds."

There is nowhere to go or stay, as any place

to go or stay is thought-based.

Namaste,

Dan

Q:

Is the Buddhist view, that there is no continuous

entity answering to the ideas of the individual soul,

correct or not? Is this consistent with the Hindu

notion of a reincarnating ego? Is the soul a

continuous entity which reincarnates again and again,

according to the Hindu doctrine, or is it a mere mass

of mental tendencies- samskaras?

Ramana :

The real Self is continuous and unaffected. The

reincarnating ego belongs to the lower plane, namely,

thought. It is transcended by Self-realisation.

Reincarnations are due to a spurious offshoot.

Therefore they are denied by the Buddhists. The

present state of ignorance is due to the

identification of consciousness [chit] with the

insentient [jada] body.

from Be As You Are

 

 

Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.

http://buzz./

Sponsor

<http://rd./M=201621.1455087.3033008.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700060955:N/A=615447/R=2/*http://store./cgi-bin/clink?ydomains+merchant-ad:dmad/M=201621.1455087.3033008.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700060955:N/A=615447/R=3/992533839+http://domains./>

 

/join

 

All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights,

perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and

subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not

different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of

the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always

Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart

to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the

Truth of Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It

Self. Welcome all to a.

Terms of Service

<> .

Sponsor

Click for Details

<http://rd./M=168002.1477935.3051340.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700060955:N/A=624150/*http://mojofarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/990-1736-1039-2?bn=LikeManDVD468>

 

/join

 

All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights,

perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and

subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not

different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of

the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always

Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart

to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the

Truth of Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It

Self. Welcome all to a.

Terms of Service

<> .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

At 03:37 PM 6/14/01 -0400, you wrote:

>Yes, that's great Dan. There are a few people are two other lists

>currently grappling with this.

>

>In Theravada- the focus for understanding is on the point of contact of

>'I' and sight, sound etc.The twelve links,Dependent Origination. Very

>little reference to anything prior to this. And not much public teaching

>on recognition of the nature of mind, although I have found a few

>references (pure mind) with the practices. Understanding emptiness has to

>include understanding, insight into, Dependent Origination and visa versa.

>

>In Dzogchen, the twelve links (as an explanation of the causes of cyclic

>life) starts with:

>

>"The beginningless nature of mind is empty, clear and unobstructed,

>But its nature is not recognized"

>

>Then follows the arising, or stirring of mental creations and the

>production of dualistic appearances. Similar in expression as Thera.

>

>So -this'no-where to go or to stay' would you also express as the

>'beginningless nature of mind'? At least as a teaching device?

 

 

Hi Joyce --

 

Probably as "the end of mind"

or "where mind can't grasp anything"

 

Could say "beginningless" ...

but why "nature of mind"

 

If there's no beginning, how

did it get defined as mind,

or as having a nature?

 

;-)

 

Beginningless Love,

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, Daniel Berkow <berkowd@u...> wrote:

> At 03:37 PM 6/14/01 -0400, you wrote:

> >Yes, that's great Dan. There are a few people are two other lists

> >currently grappling with this.

> Dan

 

Namaste All,

 

Why do people have to grapple and intellectualise illusion? Why not

just get over it? Do what you have to do whilst your in it, but try to

accept it doesn't exist, never did......ONS....Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namaste All,

Why do people have to grapple and intellectualise illusion? Why not

just get over it? Do what you have to do whilst your in it, but try to

accept it doesn't exist, never did......ONS....Tony.

Dear Tony,

There's nothing to get over.

There's no one in it, to get

out of it.

How can an illusion accept

that an illusion doesn't exist?

Love,

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, Daniel Berkow <berkowd@u...> wrote:

>

> >Namaste All,

> >

> >Why do people have to grapple and intellectualise illusion? Why not

> >just get over it? Do what you have to do whilst your in it, but try

to

> >accept it doesn't exist, never did......ONS....Tony.

>

> Dear Tony,

>

> There's nothing to get over.

> There's no one in it, to get

> out of it.

> How can an illusion accept

> that an illusion doesn't exist?

>

> Love,

> Dan

 

Namaste Dan,

 

One has to use a thorn to remove a thorn, or the thorn stays

in..ONS..Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namaste Dan,

One has to use a thorn to remove a thorn, or the thorn stays

in..ONS..Tony.

If one knows this, why would

one stick a thorn in his own

flesh, and then set about

finding a thorn to remove it?

Love,

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, Daniel Berkow <berkowd@u...> wrote:

>

> >Namaste Dan,

> >

> >One has to use a thorn to remove a thorn, or the thorn stays

> >in..ONS..Tony.

>

> If one knows this, why would

> one stick a thorn in his own

> flesh, and then set about

> finding a thorn to remove it?

>

> Love,

> Dan

 

Namaste Dan,

 

That of course is the ultimate question, and the answer is it didn't

happen......ONS....Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...