Guest guest Posted June 21, 2001 Report Share Posted June 21, 2001 Hmm...don't know where 'previous post' went to but as it happens I have tattered copy of ON HAVING NO HEAD - Zen and the Rediscovery of the Obvious (D.E.Harding) on the desk beside me. Nice syncronicity. I met Douglas years ago when I was an earnest Zen student and he came to visit our sangha. He did and said many interesting things, one of which was to take my glasses off my nose and then slowly put them back again telling me to "let your eye be single and full of light". It was quite a while before I got it. Most of his exercises are on the nice Headless web site. Takes practice but works. Hard to believe you get it because it is so obvious. Or that something so essential and wonderful is so accessible, especially if one has been a 'practitioner" for many years and knows a lot..laugh. Sometimes people get it and then say, hey, that's dangerous. And then one needs to keep practicing. He says: "The Headless Way - in contrast to those that combine Eastern spirituality with Western psychotherapy - is not concerned with deliberately watching the porcesses of the mind, or with psychological probing as such, or with meditation aimed at raising repressed material to the surface: or (for that matter) with stilling the mind. Rather it takes the line of Ramana Maharshi, who taught: "To adhere in the Self is the thing, Never mind the mind." And of Chang Chen Chi, who (in his valuable guide The Practice of Zen) points out that zen isn't interested in the aspects and strata of the mind but in penetrating to its core, "for it holds that once this core is grasped, all else will become relatively insignificant and crystal clear." And so on. The chapter on the eight stages of the Headless Way is interesting, How did we get from nondual (very early childhood) to dual and then go back again -and I can post from if anyone is curious. Now to do some work..gotta get 'ahead' ya know. Love Joyce , Greg Goode <goode@D...> wrote: > His most famous book (now out of print) is ON HAVING NO HEAD. Many of the > seeing techniques and exercises can be seen on their website, > www.headless.org. I use things like these in the last part of my 6- month > Advaita Vedanta class. Thanks for the link, I'll keep that. I found Harding's writings to be puzzling at first but he does present them with a lot of humor and wit. I think it's good to see something like his writings which do not carry spiritual ovetones or the common trappings of non dual teachings. A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2001 Report Share Posted June 21, 2001 Hi Joyce, Thanks for the info on the Headless Way and for sharing the story about your glasses. This site has an interesting opening - you need the 'flash' plug -in to view it. http://www.headless.org/ Love, james , "Joyce Short" <insight@s...> wrote: > Hmm...don't know where 'previous post' went to but as it happens I have > tattered copy of > > ON HAVING NO HEAD - Zen and the Rediscovery of the Obvious (D.E.Harding) on > the desk beside me. Nice syncronicity. > > I met Douglas years ago when I was an earnest Zen student and he came to > visit our sangha. He did and said many interesting things, one of which was > to take my glasses off my nose and then slowly put them back again telling > me to "let your eye be single and full of light". It was quite a while > before I got it. > > Most of his exercises are on the nice Headless web site. Takes practice but > works. Hard to believe you get it because it is so obvious. Or that > something so essential and wonderful is so accessible, especially if one has > been a 'practitioner" for many years and knows a lot..laugh. Sometimes > people get it and then say, hey, that's dangerous. And then one needs to > keep practicing. He says: > > "The Headless Way - in contrast to those that combine Eastern spirituality > with Western psychotherapy - is not concerned with deliberately watching the > porcesses of the mind, or with psychological probing as such, or with > meditation aimed at raising repressed material to the surface: or (for that > matter) with stilling the mind. Rather it takes the line of Ramana Maharshi, > who taught: "To adhere in the Self is the thing, Never mind the mind." And > of Chang Chen Chi, who (in his valuable guide The Practice of Zen) points > out that zen isn't interested in the aspects and strata of the mind but in > penetrating to its core, "for it holds that once this core is grasped, all > else will become relatively insignificant and crystal clear." > > And so on. The chapter on the eight stages of the Headless Way is > interesting, How did we get from nondual (very early childhood) to dual and > then go back again -and I can post from if anyone is curious. > > Now to do some work..gotta get 'ahead' ya know. > > Love Joyce > > > > , Greg Goode <goode@D...> wrote: > > > His most famous book (now out of print) is ON HAVING NO HEAD. Many > of the > > seeing techniques and exercises can be seen on their website, > > www.headless.org. I use things like these in the last part of my 6- > month > > Advaita Vedanta class. > > Thanks for the link, I'll keep that. > > I found Harding's writings to be puzzling at first but he does > present them with a lot of humor and wit. > > I think it's good to see something like his writings which do not > carry spiritual ovetones or the common trappings of non dual > teachings. > > > A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2001 Report Share Posted June 22, 2001 , "Joyce Short" <insight@s...> wrote: > ON HAVING NO HEAD - Zen and the Rediscovery of the Obvious (D.E.Harding) on > the desk beside me. Nice syncronicity. Neat The stars must be right for a common experience of utter headlessness. Sleppy Hollow. > I met Douglas years ago when I was an earnest Zen student and he came to > visit our sangha. He did and said many interesting things, one of which was > to take my glasses off my nose and then slowly put them back again telling > me to "let your eye be single and full of light". It was quite a while > before I got it. That sounds like an interesting meeting. The earnestness of your past practice touches me even though you may have had some second thoughts about it later on. >Hard to believe you get it because it is so obvious. Or that > something so essential and wonderful is so accessible, especially if one has > been a 'practitioner" for many years and knows a lot..laugh. Isn't that usually the case ? The natural way is the best. So many times it's best not to decide before looking. >Sometimes > people get it and then say, hey, that's dangerous. And then one needs to > keep practicing. He says: > >Rather it takes the line of Ramana Maharshi, > who taught: "To adhere in the Self is the thing, Never mind the mind." And > of Chang Chen Chi, who (in his valuable guide The Practice of Zen) points > out that zen isn't interested in the aspects and strata of the mind but in > penetrating to its core, "for it holds that once this core is grasped, all > else will become relatively insignificant and crystal clear." > > And so on. The chapter on the eight stages of the Headless Way is > interesting, How did we get from nondual (very early childhood) to dual and > then go back again -and I can post from if anyone is curious. Please post some when you have time. I'd be curious to see more. It's a bit funny ppl feel the headless approach is "dangerous" but I can see why. I've only found it to be dangerous while running too fast down the stairs. The loss of depth perception does seem to be interfering at first. I remember the headlessness from even late childhood and thinking I had the faces of everyone when looking at others. I can vaguely remember that being lost some time in the early teens, so I think the little excerpt was interesting. Am. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.