Guest guest Posted June 22, 2001 Report Share Posted June 22, 2001 Dear Joyce, i've never much valued agreement or disagreement. To some it seems very important -- seen here, it simply encourages what's been called "vain argumentation." It's often "pleasant" to see agreement on the level of the mind... and "unpleasant" to see disagreement. Going beyond that endless cycle of clinging to the pleasant and "pushing away" the unpleasant means simply observing it closely and watching how it operates, without allowing oneself to get submerged in it. Eventually, the entire mechanism (or "how it works") becomes clear. That's the value in the Jnana approach (viveka - 'discrimination' and vairagya - 'unattachment'). Namaste, Tim , "Joyce Short" <insight@s...> wrote: > > > > Namaste All, > > Yes I can agree on this, wonders never cease!! > > How lovely, Tim and Tony are in agreement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2001 Report Share Posted June 22, 2001 Thank you for telling me this. Un attaching from unattachment is good too. Joyce Dear Joyce, i've never much valued agreement or disagreement. To some it seems very important -- seen here, it simply encourages what's been called "vain argumentation." It's often "pleasant" to see agreement on the level of the mind... and "unpleasant" to see disagreement. Going beyond that endless cycle of clinging to the pleasant and "pushing away" the unpleasant means simply observing it closely and watching how it operates, without allowing oneself to get submerged in it. Eventually, the entire mechanism (or "how it works") becomes clear. That's the value in the Jnana approach (viveka - 'discrimination' and vairagya - 'unattachment'). Namaste, Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.