Guest guest Posted June 22, 2001 Report Share Posted June 22, 2001 Hi James, , "james traverse" <nisarga@c...> wrote: > > Hi Omkara, > > Thanks - I see your point about defining 'nondualists'. > > - If there is a nondualist then it isn't nondualism. Yes, 'conceptually' speaking (and that's really the only kind of speaking that happens :-). > So does that mean that nondualists nondualism is an > oxymoron? It means that (one of the) basic tenets of 'nondualism' is "nothing separate" and/or "no small self, or 'me'." So "a particular nondualist" as separate from "another nondualist" is clearly 'dualistic' :-). Unless you wanted to say "There is only one nondualist" -- that might just cut the mustard <laugh>. > > If yes, what implications does it have on > the 'Vndists' commentary? Clearly, "verbal nondualism" is a term Tony coined out of thin air... i have no idea what it has to do with anything, except what may exist in Tony's mind :-). Namaste, Omkara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.