Guest guest Posted June 27, 2001 Report Share Posted June 27, 2001 Dear Glo, i posted a response from the website, but it didn't show up on the list, and i don't feel like recollecting earlier thoughts. i am tired of these "spiritual lists" and will be going into complete 'retirement' at anytime. Harshasatsangh remains the last list d here... soon the number will be zero. "The Core" website will remain 'up' as always. Peace, Tim , "Gloria Lee" <glee@i...> wrote: > Dear Tim, > > Oh dear, not sure quite how you mean that unconditional love depends on duality, would you kindly elaborate? I have never forgotten the way sweet old Dan explained this Lover & Beloved so simply. Its not a choice between being two OR one, but that two IS one. (and not one, either.. don't you love these paradoxes? :) Because those two are not some identical blob of sameness. Dan said this more poetically, of course. > > Besides which, when there are no 'others', is a perpective which still allows for an awareness of others, no need to lose interest. Tho likely the seeking aspect would fall away, as you mentioned. It is quite remarkable how Ramana could see and respond to people so differently, precisely 'as needed', of course. That understanding extended to animals as well. You would love these stories about monkeys, dogs, and cows with Ramana. I'll have to type some up. > > ...let's talk about love, > Gloria Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.