Guest guest Posted June 27, 2001 Report Share Posted June 27, 2001 , "Omkara" <coresite@h...> wrote: > > Dear Glo, > > , "Gloria Lee" <glee@i...> wrote: > > Dear Tim, > > > > Oh dear, not sure quite how you mean that unconditional love > > depends on duality, would you kindly elaborate? > > Sure, with the understanding that "you asked me to." > > It depends on the definition of love -- and as Jan pointed out, love > really can't be defined. So any explanation given here is dependent > entirely on words, which "don't express it." > > So i will simply remain silent at this point, and ask your > forgiveness for not putting into words what "doesn't fit" into words. > > It isn't important what i said about love, only what you *know* > (knowing in this context pointing to 'wordless knowing'). If you do > not know, then please, "go within and find." > > i am tired of these "spiritual lists" and this is the last one i > remain d to. Soon i will be disappearing entirely from all > of them ("The Core" website will remain 'up'). > > Namaste, > > Tim Namaste Tim et al, Love, is as definable as Saguna Brahman for it is her energy. Sometimes it seems hurtful and negative other times caressing and positive, but in all cases it is 'being' right. So when we are in touch with our Higher Mind we are nearer to the pristine state of Saguna's impermanent appearance and energy. Most human love is attachment. Love can be recognised sometimes by sacrifice. for what is Saguna but a sacrifice? Love is not the warm fuzzies of the lower energies, per se. Love is Saguna and Saguna is Love. ONS..Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.