Guest guest Posted July 4, 2001 Report Share Posted July 4, 2001 Hi Alton, , "ALTON ALTON" <lostnfoundation> wrote: > Dear Tim: > > You wrote: > > Nisargadatta's 'lectures' are bound to be less controversial. > Than who's? Than those perceived to be coming from an entirely imaginary 'entity' posting under the 'alias' of Omkara and going by the legal name "Tim" on bank statements, birth certificates and the like. There is no such 'continuous entity' at all (just another series of flickering images), but imaginations occasionally run high on these lists, and a sense of continuity is artificially given to what amounts to nobody and nothing in particular. > Tim Wrote: > > i was under the impression you appreciate Nisargadatta, but got > > what seems like a 'mixed message' about that last night. It > > really doesn't matter, but it came as kind of a surprise. > > It must matter or you would not have brought it up? It 'matters' in that it came as a surprise... other than that, not particularly. i hardly even remember any of the subject matter posted here last night -- even this much is a 'stretch'. <snip> > The point I was attempting to make was Nisargadatta made no claims > to consistency and can say the opposite things to two different > individuals. If the shoe fits I wear it. Ok... i didn't 'get' the point you were trying to make, or even if there was one - it simply 'came across' as some sort of a mixed message. Namaste, Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.