Alton-OMKARA

[Guest guest]

, "Omkara" <coresite@h...> wrote:

> Please do understand that you have created in your mind an

> entity "Tim" and endowed that entity with certain "permanent

> qualities" due to ignorance of the fact that ego and personality are

> entirely imaginary and nonexistent.

 

Remember this when I kill your cat tonight.

> Killing is killing. The "spirit" of killing is what seems

> important. For example, taking two situations:

>

> (1) A man is starving to death, and the only choice is to kill a cow

> in order to live, or simply to die of starvation -- so the man kills

> the cow.

>

> (2) A man stomps and kills an ant for the pleasure of watching the

> ant struggle (torso separated from head), and then die.

>

> So in the two examples above, which sounds "worse?" And why

> does "the size of the animal" matter? Where does one draw the line?

 

So there might be degrees in the spirit

of killing, but not the killing.

 

I will kill your cat in a spirit

of joy,

I promise.

> i like to dialogue with those who are

> intelligent and open-minded (not gullible), and possessing of at

> least a little wisdom ("spiritual" or "worldly" -- i don't

> distinguish).

 

If wisdom landed on a fool's head

like a brick,

would he know what hit him?

> "Love" is only real when unconditional (not based on conditions).

 

Isn't it a condition to only address those

with 'at least a little bit of wisdom'?

[aw, to hell with them]

> Since i can find that in close relatives, and in a close pet ('my

> cat' Penelope),

 

If it's so unconditional

then you will still love me

when I kill your cat tonight.

> don't bother with this false, manipulative nonsense

> you have been calling "love" on this list. i am not fooled in the

> slightest.

>

> Thanks for the consideration... now, on to more interesting topics.

 

David

(loving cat butcher)