Guest guest Posted July 15, 2001 Report Share Posted July 15, 2001 Dear Dan, Your words have meaning within the context of "meaning." Yet because (like all words) they can only assert, they present only one side of a very dual coin. Thus, all 'nondual talk' is dual talk, and all 'dual talk' is dual talk. The above is also an assertion and thus entirely 'dualistic', as is this sentence. Even to say "neither assertion nor denial" asserts a lack of assertion and denial. Assertively :-), Tim , Daniel Berkow <berkowd@u...> wrote: > The one who is present in this environment, is > the one who is present in every other environment. > > Stay or leave, the one present is, as always. > > Perhaps this sounds like nondual talk, and yet, > the truth of it is not in the talk, but is indeed > self-evident. > > The concerns between this and that entity, about > what form of government to have or not have, > requires that there be entities being governed. > These concerns aren't meaningless within the > conceptual realm in which they are relevant. > Yet, beyond that realm, one is. > > Love, > Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2001 Report Share Posted July 15, 2001 To amend this... Everything perceivable and conceivable appears to be the same 'universal assertion'. "Manifestation" or "the universe" is unsplit assertion (appearance of multiplicity within the Singular Assertion being "illusion"). Love, Tim , "Omkara" <coresite@h...> wrote: > > Dear Dan, > > Your words have meaning within the context of "meaning." Yet > because > (like all words) they can only assert, they present only one side > of a very dual coin. Thus, all 'nondual talk' is dual talk, and > all 'dual talk' is dual talk. > > The above is also an assertion and thus entirely 'dualistic', as is > this sentence. Even to say "neither assertion nor denial" asserts a > lack of assertion and denial. > > Assertively :-), > > Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2001 Report Share Posted July 15, 2001 To amend further... i don't believe i'm making any sense :-). Heheheheheh! Joy & Laughter, Tim , "Omkara" <coresite@h...> wrote: > > To amend this... > > Everything perceivable and conceivable appears to be the > same 'universal assertion'. "Manifestation" or "the universe" is > unsplit assertion (appearance of multiplicity within the Singular > Assertion being "illusion"). > > Love, > > Tim > > , "Omkara" <coresite@h...> wrote: > > > > Dear Dan, > > > > Your words have meaning within the context of "meaning." Yet > > because > > (like all words) they can only assert, they present only one side > > of a very dual coin. Thus, all 'nondual talk' is dual talk, and > > all 'dual talk' is dual talk. > > > > The above is also an assertion and thus entirely 'dualistic', as is > > this sentence. Even to say "neither assertion nor denial" asserts > a > > lack of assertion and denial. > > > > Assertively :-), > > > > Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2001 Report Share Posted July 16, 2001 Dear Dan and Tim, > ...a very dual coin... a coin coinness, wholeness, oneness.* knowing no sides, taking no sides, seeing no sides, as we see it tumbling, seeing either head or tail. a coin, we flip it, it tumbles mirth and laughter... Love, Wim * unless it is a Canadian toony, that two faced, two dollar, two metal coin, core of copper inside a rim of nickel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.