Guest guest Posted July 21, 2001 Report Share Posted July 21, 2001 Hi Lobster, I know what you mean - I too thought of the generous, charitable poor people I have known when I read that first item. I think what it might mean is for a given person, it might be easier to be charitable when one is not poor. For a given person, take away all their money, and they'll be even less charitable than they were before. It could also mean that a poor person isn't capable of giving away great quantities, even though they give great percentages of what they do have. Among the Chinese Buddhists that I know, for example the Buddha's Light International based in Taiwan, there's great value placed on education, getting ahead in society so that the family and temple and Dharma can be supported. And support it they do... Number (2) - you know, I have been in the Freemasons, 32nd degree. And by and large, the ones that have great authority there, also have it on the outside. They give time, money and influence to the organization. But they tend not to be the ones who *study* it, who know the lore, the ceremonies by heart, etc. Those are the studious, scholarly ones, mostly not authoritative on the outside. And I never saw it practiced as a spiritual path, though that's why I entered.... Same as at work in my job now. Most of the people I know at work who study the Way in some fashion or other don't have positions of great authority or responsibility. Thes and Partners study their responsibilities as Director and Partner, by and large. If they study the Way at all, it's like nightstand spirituality -- read a few nice thoughts before drifting off to sleep. Which is pretty good, actually!! With you in the Ease, --Greg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.