Guest guest Posted July 24, 2001 Report Share Posted July 24, 2001 Of course. We use words, but are beyond words (including these). We use concepts, but are beyond concepts (including this one). So true, Dan, I was just saying the other day.... It doesnt matter what I know.... for I will never be able to express it perfectly in words.... Words only confuse the truth and make me appear inadequate... but oh well, we say things to the best of our ability... It is up to us, the listener, to not nitpick {dont you just love that word.... lol... I get a visual image of monkeys picking nits off of each other} Its up to us, to not nitpick at another's choice of words to describe an idea and a concept... It might just be..... the two are one in understanding.... we are just saying it differently... )))) Hugs and Hugs and more Hugs.... Everyone have a wonderful day ))) ~~~~~With Delight~~~~~ ~~Upon the Waves of Life ~~ ~~~~~Yours Truly~~~~~~ ~~~~~~Lynette~~~~~~~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2001 Report Share Posted July 24, 2001 Hi Matthew! , Daniel Berkow <berkowd@u...> wrote: > > > So, for me, the surrender of identity can only be the "seeing through" of > identity. I agree that such seeing through is implied in different > cultures. However, cultures also seem to get caught in their own > metaphors, so that whatever the God concept (or enlightenment > concept) is, they start to take it very seriously in different ways. ................does this include the "seeing through" concept? Of course. We use words, but are beyond words (including these). We use concepts, but are beyond concepts (including this one). > So, the God concept seems as > much of a hindrance as a help to "surrender of identity",since it > is a form of identity, which is to be surrendered. ................a hinderance to some, a help to others, thus we have so many ways of looking at and describing the undescribable. Sure -- but do you know who you are beyond any description? If so, no placement of self into description, no attempt to get beyond description, either. It just doesn't apply. > > Thus, surrender of identity is also surrender of culture, and surrender > of God. ..........well, the concept of god anyway. Of course "surrendering" surrenders its own presumed > activity as well! .................everything must go!! Nothing to start, nothing needing to be finished. Nothing to get rid of, nothing out of place. Where am I? Who cares? Love. Be. Is. > > .. > A great deal of what culture > and religion do, as I see it, is reinforce the tendency of thought and > perception to structure around a "me" of the past, which can be the > "individualist 'me' " that is so prominent in Western cultures, but which > also can be the "group 'me'" of more tradition-focused cultures ("my group > that shares the same symbols, expectations, etc."). So, cultures and > religions tend to stress how you are to be understood in terms of your past > actions, the beliefs and expectations you share with others, the rituals > that connect you to others, and so on. There is a sense of individual and > shared time and space, that is surrendered when identity is > surrendered. There is no longer an individual or group who can claim to > belong to a place and time, or to be going through time to get someplace. ............i agree dan and there is no getting away from it since any where you turn there is going to be a culture doing that very thing. There is no place to go where that cultural reinforcement of the individuated "i" isn't happening. Only in a culture where "seeing through" of identity is "lived" could there begin to be a reversal in the way culture reinforces self- referencing. Who I am depends not on culture. Cultures arise and depart, as do languages, actions, and beings. I alone do not arise nor depart. Thus, no culture has ever fully recognized me, imparted me through image or word, nor encountered me. And yes, as you indicate, where "human being" is, culture is, as well. Like a fish is not found where water is not. How is it that a human being is able to empty itself of all that arises and departs, all that begins and ends, including culture and body-mind associations? Some call this a mystery, yet it is only the actual present nature of *what is* ... Which is beyond every beyond culture or form, yet always breathing life into temporary forms and beings, which is the very presence that allows forms and beings to present themselves ... Love, Dan ........matthew /join All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights, perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the Truth of Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It Self. Welcome all to a. Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.