adoration and love/Harsha

[Guest guest]

>Harsha:

>The limitations of words Ed, especially in describing the

>Truth of Reality, is that we have to make the assumption

>that we can stand outside the Truth, Reality, and therefore

>can speak about it in a manner that is independent of that Reality.

Dear Harsha,

The possibility of being outside of Reality to speak of "It", and the prior necessity of

an assumption to so speak, cannot even exist, for how can anything be outside of

Reality. The assumption of being outside Reality, and describing it, is an illusion of

self-perception. Any attempt to place anything outside of Reality -is unrealistic,

including such attempts.

There is no limitation of words per se, but only of their limited interpretation -this

resulting from the illusion of self-perception.

>That is why anything can be said.

Yes, anything can be said...and yet be seen as Truth.

A dot "." printed on a piece of paper not only 'speaks' as itself, but of the boundless

ALL beyond it...the explicit and the implicit. But the lure of reading and writing words

sequentially -seeing, generally- very subtly alters the self's perceptual focus and

mentation, causing the integral self/Self potential to cling to the finite aspect.

Thus, the illusion of self within Self, roughly speaking.

Namaste, Ed