India, Any comments?--reply

[Guest guest]

Thanks for this Tony,

here in the U.K. we have reaped the results of factory farming and the

insanity of feeding animal products and added hormones to herbivores.

Our animals have become diseased and now the poison is seen to jump

species barriers. Even without the consent of the population, arable

farms in whole areas of the country have been tainted by genetically

modified pollens. The result of which no one can be certain of.

The corporations experiment with Western nations as well as third world countries.

and the consumer has become a laboratory mouse to be tested upon.

love

eric.

Namaste All,

Vandana Shiva on McDonald's, Exploitation

and the Global Economy

Transcript of the RealAudio Interview

Vandana Shiva is the Director of The

Research Foundation for Science,

Technology and Natural Resource Policy, a

network of researchers specialising in

sustainable agriculture and development.

ONS.....T.

She is also Ecology Adviser to

the Third World

Network, which aims to bring about a

greater voice for people in the Third World, a fair

and ecologically sustainable distribution

of world resources.

Vandana Shiva was interviewed

in

1997 by One-Off Productions for their TV

documentary, McLibel: Two Worlds Collide.

How did you become a

campaigner on environmental and animal welfare

issues?

Animal welfare has got more

threatened recently in India as a result

of free trade policies, which are forcing many of us who

assumed that in India at least

that the cow was sacred and would be

saved - that we had a culture of compassion and that was

one area we didn't have to

create new campaigns on because our

civilisation has ensured that animals are respected and

protected.

That's come under new assault

because of the fast food chains, factory

farming and the entire globalisation of a rotten food

culture - and a very

environmentally destructive and

culturally-destructive agricultural system.

You are a leading opponent of

fast food chains' expansion into India.

What is the present situation?

Pepsi subsidiary Kentucky

Fried Chicken is supposed to by now have

opened 30 outlets. They have only managed to have 2

running for a short while

because both - the one in Bangalore and the

one in Delhi - faced long-

term protests from people.

We had a very wide alliance of

farmers, consumers, doctors and

environmentalists - of people concerned about Indian culture

and our cultural values,

people concerned about animals and cruelty to

animals getting together to resist this onslaught.

The way Kentucky Fried Chicken

managed to get its outlets open despite

the protests, was through changing standards, getting

the Government of India to

change those standards and the permissible

level on MSG - Mono-sodium Glutamate - which is

now recognised worldwide to be

a health hazard and which has wrongly

been called a food additive when it is really a drug -

which fools us by sending

signals to our brain that there is taste in

the food when there is none. Besides, fooling us about

food

has severe health hazards.

We are definitely going to

continue our campaign against KFC and

McDonald's. McDonald's has yet to open any outlets. I

think they are waiting for the

feeling with KFC - the chicken is not

as sacred as the cow in India so they thought that if

Kentucky Fried Chicken can

spread then they'll come in behind.

They have recently signed a

contract with the largest slaughterhouse

in India, which has been facing protest because of the

slaughter of cattle, the

export of meat - the conversion of India from

a culture of sacred and living cows to being an

exporter of

cattle meat.

McDonalds, signing up this

contract, will face not just the old

protests against junk food chains, but will also face the

campaigns

against the slaughterhouse,

and we are basically planning to have very

major road blockades - liberating the cattle on their way

to the slaughterhouse -

ensuring that we really articulate the

campaign around the freedom of animals and the freedom of

people, and not just the

freedom for capital the way it is currently.

Will McDonald's be able,

through advertising, to sell the 'McDonald's

Experience' in India?

The McDonald's experience,

which is really the experience of eating

junk while thinking you are in heaven, because of the

golden arches, which is

supposed I guess to suggest that you enter

heaven, and the clown Ronald McDonald, are experiences

that the majority of the

Indian population would reject - I think that

our people are too earthy.

First of all it would be too

expensive for the ordinary Indian - for

the peasant, or the person in the slums - it's an experience

that

a very tiny elite would engage

in, and most of that elite - which

knows what good food is about - would not fall for.

We do have one of the largest,

most diverse food cultures - a very

sophisticated food culture. I've heard it said that the one

thing you can't make Indians

give up is their food culture - they come

to England and carry it with them.

But there is a small middle

class and a tiny elite section that I

believe feels inferior about what they are, that has been so

subjected to the pressures of

Westernisation that they feel

second-rate Westerners, and people would go in for the experience

not because of what the

experience is, but for what it symbolises.

There will definitely be a

tiny, tiny fragment in our population, but

since we have a large population it will be a large

market

which is why McDonald's want

to enter it.

Do you think the McLibel case

in the UK has wide significance?

I think the case against

McDonald's - the McLibel case - is a very,

very significant case - not

just because of the

unaccountabiltiy of chains like McDonald's, that

misuse and exploit labour,

misuse and exploit the

environment, and misuse and exploit consumers.

I think it's also important

because there are new structures of

unaccountability being created.

For instance I used the

McLibel case in evidence I was giving to our

Parliament on the

formulation of new trade-mark

laws, which actually had clauses -

because they were written

under the pressure of GATT and

free trade and the protection of

capital - that actually had

clauses that said that if

anyone was to use the name or the symbol of

any company that had a

protected trade-mark in ways

that could hurt the image and the product

of that company then it would be treated as a

trademark infringement, and

under the new version of law would be

treated as a criminal act - as an act allowing arrest without

warrant.

And I cited the case of the

McLibel suit to show that what is now an

opening that people have in terms of challenging a

company would not be an

opening if these new laws were created. And

we

can't afford it, because in democracy unless citizens

have the right to bring

systems of accountability into the

relationship of corporations with people, democracy is a farce -

it is

empty.

Is the information that is

coming out through the McLibel case useful

to your campaigning?

The information that has been

made available to the world by a handful

of activists, making transparent the workings of a

globally-operating corporation

like McDonald's, is extremely important

because the advertising.

The global arches is

advertising that makes it look as if here is a

wonderful system coming to your doorstep, superior to

anything you have had -

superior to your food, superior to your

production, superior to your culture, your economy - and the

McLibel campaign has actually

brought out to the front the underside

of the workings of a fast-

food chain like McDonald's, the

working conditions under which

people operate, the hazards people face

- the health hazards.

I think it is a particularly

important case, in today's time where

with free trade there is a lot of talk about how labour is

exploited

in the Third World, about

child labour making carpets in India. I

think it is very important to see that McDonald's is

probably

the most important exploiter

of child labour in the world.

What do you see as the

connections between the use of resources by

multinationals and Third World poverty?

The takeover of the global

economy by global corporations based on

wasteful production and based on actually destruction of

livelihoods and jobs, is

definitely becoming a very very major threat

to the peoples of India.

If we just take the case of

the companies who will supply the meat to

McDonald's - just by buying up cattle and leading to a

slaughter of the living

economy of cattle-based agriculture, where

cattle pull the ploughs, provide the energy, provide the

organic manure - are literally

the support base of sustainable

agriculture.

Within a few years we've had

the destruction of 300,000 livelihoods,

with peasants losing their only source of economic

survival. That's a very direct

attack on the survival of people.

But there's a second level of

attack on the survival of people, which

is the fact that food which today goes towards feeding the

poor and the hungry in India

will get diverted to feed the animals

which will then go into fast food chains to feed, in India

definitely, the elite.

There is a third component

related to it - that the land and water

that today meets the survival needs of the people of India

will

get diverted to factory farms,

will get diverted to producing the meat

base for these chains.

This is why for our current

campaigns - in the month of March we're

going to be doing a very major rally with farmers - giving

notice to all election

candidates - because we're having our national

elections in April - saying that anyone standing for

Parliament who does not commit

themselves to supporting local

communities in terms of control over natural resources like

land, water, biodiversity and

is actually found to be supporting the

takeover of these natural resources by transnational

corporations should not even

dare come to the villages for votes.

We are declaring that the

resources of India are for the sustenance of

the Indian people and not for the profits of

irresponsible

corporations.

At the Beijing Conference last

year there was an anti-McDonald's

demonstration. Can you tell us about it?

If

someone was to ask me what was the

highlight of Beijing, I would definitely not say it was

Hillary Clinton's speech.

I

would say it was the demonstration of the

women against the McDonald's outlet at the NGO

Forum, and the protest really was an

initiative of the younger women at a lecture I was giving

on

food security, intellectual property rights

and biodiversity, and was basically just talking

about

how the control over the food system is

shifting, through various mechanisms, into the

hands

of a few corporations.

And one of the young women

stood up and said: 'Did you know that

Ronald McDonald is here without a visa? Do you think he

should be here?' I said well

if they can make such a fuss about the

Tibetans not getting visas I think we should make a lot of

fuss about Ronald McDonald

here without the permission of the NGO

Forum - after all McDonald's is not an NGO! What's it

doing in the NGO Forum?

The younger women started the

march and asked if I would join and I

was only too happy to join. We basically took the

Ronald McDonald image, which I

find gross and obscene, and grows in

size all over the world - I really have the urge after

Beijing to pull it down

wherever I go and sit on it.

And we really had discussion

with the women from different countries,

expressing what it means to them - expressing how it's a

symbol of cultural

imperialism, it's a symbol of ecological

colonisation, and its a symbol of the pretence of food that

is really a

health hazard.

What do you mean when you say

that McDonald's is the most important

exploiter of child labour in the world?

There's so much fuss in the

world about the exploitation of child

labour and I think it would be helpful if Western countries

focused as much on the

exploitation of child labour by McDonald's as

they do on the carpet industry of India - where of

course

there should be no child

labour and we are absolutely determined that

it should end - that child labour should also end in

McDonald's outlets.

I have met with people who

started their community organising in

different parts of the world, around the way McDonald's hires

schoolchildren at below wage

levels - they start doing badly in

school, they of course don't make enough money - and has

introduced a culture of

displacing adult workers - getting away from

labour laws - while destroying children's educational

opportunities.

And at every level - the way

they work without minimum wages, without

labour standards, shows how unaccountable the

corporate world is becoming.

I don't think we should worry

as much about applying labour standards

to governments of the world - we need to be thinking

about how to apply labour

standards to the corporations of the world.

What strategies might

McDonald's use in India to suppress criticism of

themselves?

I think the way new

intellectual property rights regimes - like the

trade-mark laws - are evolving, where they are

widening

beyond infringement in terms

of competitive production - using names

and symbols in a deceptive way - into an encroachment

into criminalisation of civil

liberties, are some of the new

mechanisms that corporations like McDonalds could actually use to

suppress criticism.

And I think that corporations,

like McDonald's, who are on the one

hand destroying entire food cultures of the world and on

the other hand not giving safe

and healthy food to people, there is

going to be an inevitable outcry against their operations and

they know it.

Therefore to maintain business

in the face of deception they have to

control dissent in all kinds of ways. As long as operations

like this exist - coercive

measures, authoritarian measures, using the

legal system, against people will be inevitable.

The way McDonald's works

sounds so much like pre-perestroika Soviet

Union to me, except that the whole world was

outraged by the centralised

control of communist regimes - we don't

get so outraged with the authoritarianism of corporations

which have no accountability.

I really think that citizens

have started to recognise that the

freedom of citizens is inconsistent with the freedom of

corporations

like McDonald's have of using

legal means in irresponsible ways.

Do you think McDonald's

expansion into India will have an adverse

effect on people's diet and health?

I think across the world the

evidence is so strong that any society

that shifted its eating patterns to meat-based fast-food

chains

has had problems - Singapore

is having to set up new obesity clinics,

Japan has had a 70% increase in food-related illnesses

because of the kind of

problems fast food chains like McDonald's are

bringing.

I was recently reading a 'New

Scientist' article which says the

biggest source of epidemics and disease is now the hamburger,

including all the backward

chains into Mad Cow Disease, beef and the

rest - how factory farming and the processing jointly

combine such a potent health

hazard for people.

I think that the evidence is

clear across cultures and across races -

McDonald's is doing no good to people's health, and in a

country like India where first

of all we are not a meat culture, and

therefore our systems are ill-

adapted to meat in the first

place, and where people are

poorer - shifting to a diet like this will

have enormous impact.

------------------------ Sponsor ---------------------~-->

Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck

Monitoring Service trial

Click Here!

---~->

/join

 

All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights,

perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and

subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not

different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of

the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always

Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart

to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the

Truth of Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It

Self. Welcome all to a.

Your use of is subject to

----------------------- Headers --------------------------------

Return-Path: <sentto-73173-23266-1004051430-ErcAshfrd=aol.com (AT) returns (DOT) >

Received: from rly-za04.mx.aol.com (rly-za04.mail.aol.com

[172.31.36.100]) by air-za02.mail.aol.com (v81.9) with ESMTP id

MAILINZA25-1025191328; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:13:28 -0400

Received: from n28. (n28.

[216.115.96.78]) by rly-za04.mx.aol.com (v80.21) with ESMTP id

MAILRELAYINZA44-1025191244; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:12:44 -0400

X-eGroups-Return: sentto-73173-23266-1004051430-ErcAshfrd=aol.com (AT) returns (DOT)

Received: from [10.1.1.221] by n28. with NNFMP; 25 Oct 2001 23:10:31 -0000

Received: (qmail 16910 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2001 23:10:30 -0000

Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)

by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 25 Oct 2001 23:10:30 -0000

Received: from unknown (HELO n15.) (10.1.1.31)

by mta1 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2001 23:10:30 -0000

X-eGroups-Return: humanzee2001

Received: from [10.1.10.99] by n15. with NNFMP; 25 Oct 2001 23:10:25 -0000

X-eGroups-Approved-By: harsha-hkl (AT) home (DOT) com via web; 25 Oct 2001 23:10:29 -0000

X-Sender: humanzee2001

X-Apparently-

Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 24 Oct 2001 23:33:17 -0000

Received: (qmail 75100 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2001 23:33:16 -0000

Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)

by l8. with QMQP; 24 Oct 2001 23:33:16 -0000

Received: from unknown (HELO n33.) (10.1.2.114)

by mta1 with SMTP; 24 Oct 2001 23:33:16 -0000

X-eGroups-Return: humanzee2001

Received: from [10.1.10.95] by n33. with NNFMP; 24 Oct 2001 23:33:16 -0000

Message-ID: <9r7j3o+b9mo (AT) eGroups (DOT) com>

User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster

X-Originating-IP: 209.148.234.2

humanzee2001

X--Profile: humanzee2001

MIME-Version: 1.0

Mailing-List: list ; contact -owner

Delivered-mailing list

Precedence: bulk

List-Un: <>

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 23:33:12 -0000

India, Any comments?

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit