Guest guest Posted January 31, 2002 Report Share Posted January 31, 2002 Hi Jill, Jiva and others who responded to my TM letter, I didn't mean to attack anyone's method. I know there is power in TM. I do find it hard to imagine that people do things without an awareness of who is doing it, or why they're doing it, or what they're doing. "Jerry! I am surprised at this! It is aggressive and hostile and narrow--it seems a very conscious rudeness to many on this list whose paths and experiences differ from your own, and differ very much from the biases you express below." --Jill Thanks for letting me know! I guess harsha's list differs more NDS than I thought. That's good. We don't want every list to be like NDS. Even though we're the right ones. But seriously... I'll try to be more conscious of the differences. Bruce quoted Krishnamurti: "Meditation is not the repetition of the word, nor the experiencing of a vision, nor the cultivating of silence. The bead and the word do quieten the chattering mind, but this is a form of self-hypnosis. You might as well take a pill." so who am i to argue with that dude? or with jill? they both scare me! Further, Jill said: "On the path to the Absolute, whether we use the vehicle of the discursive thought of self-enquiry or seed thought-form of mantra, some combination, or some other vehicle, it seems we usually peacefully agree around here that it is ultimately not the thought that counts." What counts, then? What has meaning? The Absolute, or nondual knowing, is beyond meaning and meaninglessness, so I'm not sure what should count. The only thing that counts, that I know of, is the hunger to know. But to know what? Anyway, sorry if I'm not being peaceful. At some point, whether one is doing TM or anything else, whether one is a world class philosopher or physicist with one of the generation's finest minds, at some point in their probing, practicing, meditating, thinking, a point is going to come in which there is a look into the nature of who they are. This is often done by looking at attention itself, because attention is the means by which all probing is done. I guess I find it hard to believe that a person will practice something and not look at who is practicing or ever look at attention itself. In TM a person may find they've simple disappeared and maybe there is no typical inquiry. Maybe that could happen. I suppose it does. But that disappearance would be noted, and in that noting, inquiry is done, if even for an instant. When is that noting done? After the disappearance, or loss of ego, a period of adjustment normally occurs. This is the time when there is 'no mountain'. I don't know anything about TM, but if one has been chanting a mantra and manages to get to the point of no mountain, it means one has become the mantra. I suppose TM accounts for this loss of ego. And Jody said, "It's just as rude to post advertisements for money-hungry spiritual organizations, which is what Jerry was responding to." Well, I guess I react to what I see as people standing up for organizations and claiming what they offer is better something else, especially inquiry, considering this list was blessed by Ramana. Okay, so it was Steve Ramana, the guy who owns the corner store and bets on horses. Nevertheless. Jill said: >While Jiva's preacherly condescension may have been the >impetus for Jerry's post, it is not what Jerry responded >to. Instead he attacked a very broad realm of spiritual >practice, mantra meditation with the TM practice as his >focus. 'Attack' seems like strong word. But it's true, I think mantra meditation is valuable as a way to relax and a way to enter into subtle realms of attention. It's a way to clear the mind. There are probably countless benefits to mantra meditation. >Some of us on the list have practiced TM for a long time >and live with ambivalence about the organization while >finding the practice itself an important and useful tool in >the spiritual path. i have no doubt about that. >Jiva's post was just as offensive and >narrow as Jerry's, and posts like that can contribute to >giving any spiritual group or organization a bad name. I don't think either post was offensive or narrow. I think they were honest expressions. Calling for inquiry isn't narrow, that I'm aware of. I'd like to know who some of the enlightened beings are that have come out of TM, and what they teach now. We went recently to see Sri Sri Ravi Shankar. He came out of TM and has millions of followers. I love the guy, but his teaching is about ways to reduce stress, perhaps even ways to stop the world. He gives a meditation method. He uses chanting, singing, all these ways of creating a peaceful situation. It may sound rude, but I call it hypnosis. I know what I see and feel. I'd rather have a nervous jewish guy in a bad suit get on stage and tell me stop hocking myself, to stop nudging myself, to stop knocking, to stop making myself get all vertumult, to stop hocking a chainik already. What? I need peaceful music played by someone with a dot on their forehead? I need that? What does that have to do with anything? I need a mantra all of a sudden? allright, NOW I'm being rude. I'm definitely being rude. Next. Jody said: >I was initiated into a mantra by my guru, and it was my primary >mode of meditation, so I think I understand where you're coming >from. However, I didn't see Jerry's post as an attack on this >form of meditation as much as a critique of the TM presentation >of it. I hope I'm not attacking anything. If you feel my letter warrants it, maybe mantra meditation beyond the TM organization party line could be discussed. What I've been saying is that when a person does something it seems like a natural thing to ask why it's being done and who's asking. That's why I never followed any teacher or teaching, I guess, because I was always stuck at those questions. When I was a kid my mother always wanted me to join the cub scouts, the boy scouts, the girl scouts. Anything. Go out, she would say. Join something. Even my late wife used to tell me to join something. Join the elks, she would say, the lions, the antelope, the girl scouts. I always asked why I had to join. There was no reason to join anything. Everything was okay right here. Now i'm 52 years old and live by myself in a little room and share a bath with other tenants. (Not at the same time.) And I know this girl who says, Get out, join something, buy a condo, get married, get a career, join the girl scouts. I ask why. There's no reason to so I stay right here. It's all inquiry. Why? Who? I haven't found any reasons to do anything. Now Jill again: >Hey you guys! >I don't wanna be his mother! I wanna be his imaginary >bitchy girlfriend, slapping him in the gut with my handbag >whenever he embarrasses me in public! Don't make me an old >lady before my time! >Jill (The blonde chick in the back row with the glazed, >hypnotic look in her eyes) ((Jerry, meet me out back behind >the satsangh--I got some new mantras I wanna try out on >you)) Alright. Look. Here's what Harsha has to do. Each guy needs an online girlfriend who will hit him with her pocket book everytime he acts like a jerk. Harsha needs to do some matchmaking. But Jill, if you start nudging me about joining the elks club... jerry (a sucker for a blonde) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2002 Report Share Posted January 31, 2002 Jerry Katz [umbada] Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:47 PM hs Jill/Jiva/and the gang Now i'm 52 years old and live by myself in a little room and share a bath with other tenants. (Not at the same time.) And I know this girl who says, Get out, join something, buy a condo, get married, get a career, join the girl scouts. I ask why. There's no reason to so I stay right here. It's all inquiry. Why? Who? I haven't found any reasons to do anything. Alright. Look. Here's what Harsha has to do. Each guy needs an online girlfriend who will hit him with her pocket book everytime he acts like a jerk. Harsha needs to do some matchmaking. But Jill, if you start nudging me about joining the elks club... jerry (a sucker for a blonde) ************************************* This is great Jerry! I love you man. You pee all over TM and now give your particulars and tell us you are looking for a girl friend (who does TM). Actually I enjoyed what you wrote. Frankly, an honest inquiry is what I see you doing here. There is no harm in questioning the fundamental assumptions behind any method, technique, or tradition. Jody and Bruce are pointing to that questioning. If people are afraid of that, they need to be asking why? Self-honesty is all we've got. Love to all Harsha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2002 Report Share Posted January 31, 2002 Hi, This topic is timely for me as I have often questioned techniques, teachings and paths. In my own pursuit I have gone from doing up to 3 hours of yoga/mantra/meditation per day for years to doing nothing except observing and everything in between. Often during consultations I will suggest a particular technique for someone based on what is happening in one's chart. I do not know of anyone who became enlightened through techniques though I have see many spiral deeper into illusion and ego through doing too much yoga. However, there is value to chants, asanas, meditations, etc. Perhaps, as Jerry claims it is a form of hypnosis but if one is using the techniques to bring oneself away from stress, anger, confusion or depression into a sense of self than there is an important value in that. At this point in my own practice I use yoga to keep my body strong and my stress levels under control and I will use mantra to 'self-hypnotize' myself away from focusing on how little I like the circumstances of my current living situation. Years ago I was more of a yoga purist and believed that it was only through the discipline of a path that I could achieve the goal. Now I no longer believe that and know that only staying steady in the true self will get me there but I also believe that various techniques are necessary to keep the body and mind operational while I move through some very sticky karmic situations. Each path is a bit unique and what the tools have fashioned will be tested by life. Guess the challenge can be not to sacrifice the creation in defense of the paintbrush. Linda >This is great Jerry! I love you man.>You pee all over TM and now give your particulars and tell us you are>looking for a girl friend (who does TM).>Actually I enjoyed what you wrote. Frankly, an honest inquiry is what I >see>you doing here. There is no harm in questioning the fundamental >assumptions>behind any method, technique, or tradition. Jody and Bruce are pointing >to>that questioning. If people are afraid of that, they need to be asking >why?>Self-honesty is all we've got.Love to allHarsha/join All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights, perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the Truth of Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It Self. Welcome all to a.Your use of is subject to the Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2002 Report Share Posted January 31, 2002 Hi folks, Yes. I find that most folks do yoga etc. to get somehwere. I often hear people say, 'I do yoga to relax' I tell folks, 'You relax and yoga does you.' Freedom is not something that happens after 30 years of yoga practice, lifetimes of self-dicipline or some form of self-hypnosis. Freedom is Free! And it is eternally available Now! Freedom is the first step in yoga And it is the only step - it is not a going/getting somewhere - it is about here-now. As the journey unfolds from freedom to freedom to freedom we are already at the destinaton by honouring the journey. There is no way *to* Love. Love is The Way. Love, James , "da" <jyotish@w...> wrote: > Hi, > > This topic is timely for me as I have often questioned techniques, teachings and paths. In my own pursuit I have gone from doing up to 3 hours of yoga/mantra/meditation per day for years to doing nothing except observing and everything in between. > > Often during consultations I will suggest a particular technique for someone based on what is happening in one's chart. I do not know of anyone who became enlightened through techniques though I have see many spiral deeper into illusion and ego through doing too much yoga. However, there is value to chants, asanas, meditations, etc. Perhaps, as Jerry claims it is a form of hypnosis but if one is using the techniques to bring oneself away from stress, anger, confusion or depression into a sense of self than there is an important value in that. > > At this point in my own practice I use yoga to keep my body strong and my stress levels under control and I will use mantra to 'self-hypnotize' myself away from focusing on how little I like the circumstances of my current living situation. Years ago I was more of a yoga purist and believed that it was only through the discipline of a path that I could achieve the goal. Now I no longer believe that and know that only staying steady in the true self will get me there but I also believe that various techniques are necessary to keep the body and mind operational while I move through some very sticky karmic situations. > > Each path is a bit unique and what the tools have fashioned will be tested by life. Guess the challenge can be not to sacrifice the creation in defense of the paintbrush. > > Linda > > > >This is great Jerry! I love you man. > >You pee all over TM and now give your particulars and tell us you are > >looking for a girl friend (who does TM). > >Actually I enjoyed what you wrote. Frankly, an honest inquiry is what I >see > >you doing here. There is no harm in questioning the fundamental >assumptions > >behind any method, technique, or tradition. Jody and Bruce are pointing >to > >that questioning. If people are afraid of that, they need to be asking >why? > >Self-honesty is all we've got. > Love to all > Harsha Sponsor > > > ---- -- > > > > /join > > > > > > All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights, perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the Truth of Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It Self. Welcome all to a. > > > > Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2002 Report Share Posted February 1, 2002 snip > There is no way *to* Love. > Love is The Way. > > Love, > James > Well-said, James. There is nothing else to know or do. Love already is the Way. There is nothing apart from the Way. Although appearances may deceive, there is no deception in this Way, which alone is. Love, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.