Guest guest Posted February 9, 2002 Report Share Posted February 9, 2002 This incident happened during Sri Ramanas last illness. "Once the doctors were about to cut some tissue from the tumor so that tests could be done. When they were about to inject a local anaesthetic to dull the pain, Bhagavan refused and told the doctors to simply cut and take what they wanted. The doctors protested, explaining to Bhagavan that the pain would be severe without the amaesthetic. Bhagavan again refused and told them to just do it. They cut into the tumor and Bhagavan winced in pain. The doctors said: 'Bhagavan, we told you it would be painful.' Bhagavan replied: 'Yes, the body experienced pain. But am I the body?'" (Balarama Reddy: My Reminiscences, p. 106) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2002 Report Share Posted February 9, 2002 - It was a good book, getting to know the very young K. Funny how Annie Besant and the whole group thought he was being prepared thru this to be their next world leader, and actaully he ended up leaving the Theosophical Society because of what he learned. Hi Gloria, Two things : I love all your Hafiz postings, and have forwarded many of them onto another list. Many there have expressed their delight in them - thank you! With respect, I would like to offer a differing opinion regarding K. I strongly believe that he was indeed being groomed not as a "world leader" but rather as a 'vehicle' for the world teacher (Maitreya)who did overshadow him on several occasions In 1945 Maitreya announced that he would instead come in person - when certain conditions were met by humanity. Blessings Sai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2002 Report Share Posted February 9, 2002 This story reminds me of the time I had to have root canal work on a molar, and the dentist couldn't kill the pain. I looked out his back window and saw a glorious big tree, and it was full of little deva life. I didn't see them with my eyes, but I felt them, somehow saw them there. They said, "Come out to us!" And I was out in the tree with all the little devas. I was vaguely aware of the body back in the chair, and pain, the tears running down the cheeks, but I wasn't there. I felt badly to let others take the pain for me, but they said, "We can handle it better." So I stayed until it was over. I had to go back three more times, and the same thing happened every time. This incident happened during Sri Ramanas last illness. "Once the doctors were about to cut some tissue from the tumor so that tests could be done. When they were about to inject a local anaesthetic to dull the pain, Bhagavan refused and told the doctors to simply cut and take what they wanted. The doctors protested, explaining to Bhagavan that the pain would be severe without the amaesthetic. Bhagavan again refused and told them to just do it. They cut into the tumor and Bhagavan winced in pain. The doctors said: 'Bhagavan, we told you it would be painful.' Bhagavan replied: 'Yes, the body experienced pain. But am I the body?'" (Balarama Reddy: My Reminiscences, p. 106) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2002 Report Share Posted February 9, 2002 Hi Sai, With respect, I would like to offer a differing opinion regarding K. I strongly believe that he was indeed being groomed not as a "world leader" but rather as a 'vehicle' for the world teacher (Maitreya)who did overshadow him on several occasions In 1945 Maitreya announced that he would instead come in person - when certain conditions were met by humanity. I have wondered whether in this Age of Aquarius, Maitreya/Christ may come/be coming in group formation, in more than one person... Aquarius is the sign of group consciousness. Hi Dharma I believe you're right in saying that Aquarious is the sign of group consciousness I also believe that indeed Maitreya/Christ is coming in group formation - in the sense that he is bringing with him the rest of the Masters. Not only that, but that he is here already! - working hard behind the scenes, awaiting the most opportune moment for his outward mission to begin. If you're interested in reading about an American diplomats experiences, i recommend this book to you http://www.waynepeterson.com/index.html Not since Atlantean times have the Masters been openly amongst us...amazing times we're living in! Blessings Sai/join All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights, perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the Truth of Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It Self. Welcome all to a.Your use of is subject to the Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2002 Report Share Posted February 10, 2002 Dharma, the Ramana posters and Friends, In keeping with the theme of "Pain, yet Not the Body", I'm reminded of Mary Luytens observations of Krishnamurti's Kundalini agonies in Ojai, CA that preceded his enlightenment. She watched him go into trances where he was led away by various beings, (The White Brotherhood, Buddha etc.)or at least appeared to vacate the body, and the body protested, or more accurately, an intelligence with limited powers of verbal communication that seemed to be the intelligence of the body, protested of the protracted anguish and anxiety of it's condition. During the same period, when K. could not leave his body, but had to endure the same trance conditions in situ, K himself gave frequent utterance to the same almost intolerable phenomena, and could later give a simplified account of his process. While his memories of his "astral travels" was frequently dimmed or garbled, as I remember it when he reported back after being "away", he would not report remembering suffering any pain, even though his "body" protested or groaned the whole time he was gone. If you want to check it out for yourselves, the book is "Krishnamurti, the Years of Awakening" by Mary Luytens, and my copy is a cheap Avon paperback. yours in the bonds, eric , Dharma <deva@L...> wrote: > This story reminds me of the time I had to have root canal work on a > molar, and the dentist couldn't kill the pain. I looked out his back > window and saw a glorious big tree, and it was full of little deva > life. I didn't see them with my eyes, but I felt them, somehow saw > them there. They said, "Come out to us!" And I was out in the tree > with all the little devas. I was vaguely aware of the body back in > the chair, and pain, the tears running down the cheeks, but I wasn't > there. I felt badly to let others take the pain for me, but they > said, "We can handle it better." So I stayed until it was over. I > had to go back three more times, and the same thing happened every > time. > > >This incident happened during Sri Ramanas last illness. > > > >"Once the doctors were about to cut some tissue from the tumor so > >that tests could be done. > >When they were about to inject a local anaesthetic to dull the pain, > >Bhagavan refused and told > >the doctors to simply cut and take what they wanted. > >The doctors protested, explaining to Bhagavan that the pain would be > >severe without the amaesthetic. > >Bhagavan again refused and told them to just do it. > >They cut into the tumor and Bhagavan winced in pain. > >The doctors said: > >'Bhagavan, we told you it would be painful.' > > > >Bhagavan replied: > >'Yes, the body experienced pain. But am I the body?'" > > > >(Balarama Reddy: My Reminiscences, p. 106) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2002 Report Share Posted February 10, 2002 Hi Eric, Ah, so someone else has read that book. At first, it seemed wierd that K. might not remember either the physical pain, nor much of what transpired in other realms when he was "away" from his body. How could it be making any difference if he didn't have any consciousness of the process? Then it dawned on me it was thru his willingness to undergo it all, that the real transformation happened. He was so surrendered. We don't need to understand all that happens. It was a good book, getting to know the very young K. Funny how Annie Besant and the whole group thought he was being prepared thru this to be their next world leader, and actaully he ended up leaving the Theosophical Society because of what he learned. You could really feel the undeniable bravery in that move, as he was so purposefully groomed by them and thus unprepared for any independent life. Love, Gloria - eblack101 Sunday, February 10, 2002 4:07 PM Re: "Am I the body?" Dharma, the Ramana posters and Friends,In keeping with the theme of "Pain, yet Not the Body", I'm reminded of Mary Luytens observations of Krishnamurti's Kundalini agonies in Ojai, CA that preceded his enlightenment. She watched him go into trances where he was led away by various beings, (The White Brotherhood, Buddha etc.)or at least appeared to vacate the body, and the body protested, or more accurately, an intelligence with limited powers of verbal communication that seemed to be the intelligence of the body, protested of the protracted anguish and anxiety of it's condition.During the same period, when K. could not leave his body, but had to endure the same trance conditions in situ, K himself gave frequent utterance to the same almost intolerable phenomena, and could later give a simplified account of his process.While his memories of his "astral travels" was frequently dimmed or garbled, as I remember it when he reported back after being "away", he would not report remembering suffering any pain, even though his "body" protested or groaned the whole time he was gone.If you want to check it out for yourselves, the book is "Krishnamurti, the Years of Awakening" by Mary Luytens, and my copy is a cheap Avon paperback.yours in the bonds,eric, Dharma <deva@L...> wrote:> This story reminds me of the time I had to have root canal work on a > molar, and the dentist couldn't kill the pain. I looked out his back > window and saw a glorious big tree, and it was full of little deva > life. I didn't see them with my eyes, but I felt them, somehow saw > them there. They said, "Come out to us!" And I was out in the tree > with all the little devas. I was vaguely aware of the body back in > the chair, and pain, the tears running down the cheeks, but I wasn't > there. I felt badly to let others take the pain for me, but they > said, "We can handle it better." So I stayed until it was over. I > had to go back three more times, and the same thing happened every > time.> > >This incident happened during Sri Ramanas last illness.> >> >"Once the doctors were about to cut some tissue from the tumor so > >that tests could be done.> >When they were about to inject a local anaesthetic to dull the pain, > >Bhagavan refused and told> >the doctors to simply cut and take what they wanted.> >The doctors protested, explaining to Bhagavan that the pain would be > >severe without the amaesthetic.> >Bhagavan again refused and told them to just do it.> >They cut into the tumor and Bhagavan winced in pain.> >The doctors said:> >'Bhagavan, we told you it would be painful.'> >> >Bhagavan replied:> >'Yes, the body experienced pain. But am I the body?'"> >> >(Balarama Reddy: My Reminiscences, p. 106)/join All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights, perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the Truth of Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It Self. Welcome all to a.Your use of is subject to the Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2002 Report Share Posted February 10, 2002 , "prashanti" <prashanti@n...> wrote: > > - > It was a good book, getting to know the very young K. Funny how Annie Besant > and the whole group thought he was being prepared thru this to be their next world leader, and actaully he ended up leaving the Theosophical Society because of what he learned. > > Hi Gloria, > > Two things : I love all your Hafiz postings, and have forwarded many of them onto another list. Many there have expressed their delight in them - thank you! > > With respect, I would like to offer a differing opinion regarding K. I strongly believe that he was indeed being groomed not as a "world leader" but rather as a 'vehicle' for the world teacher (Maitreya)who did overshadow him on several occasions > > In 1945 Maitreya announced that he would instead come in person - when certain conditions were met by humanity. > > Blessings > Sai Frankly Sai, I don't see humanity meeting my conditions anytime soon and so I will be laying low for a bit longer. Thanks for the memories. Sahajman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2002 Report Share Posted February 10, 2002 Hi Sai, With respect, I would like to offer a differing opinion regarding K. I strongly believe that he was indeed being groomed not as a "world leader" but rather as a 'vehicle' for the world teacher (Maitreya)who did overshadow him on several occasions In 1945 Maitreya announced that he would instead come in person - when certain conditions were met by humanity. I have wondered whether in this Age of Aquarius, Maitreya/Christ may come/be coming in group formation, in more than one person... Aquarius is the sign of group consciousness. Love, Dharma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2002 Report Share Posted February 10, 2002 Sai, Glo & Friends, No sooner do I get off sending a private response to Glo about her last post when I encounter this turnabout. Sai, I tend to look at all this K stuff as a development, or K's final frightened reaction to the implications of the position you suggest. I told Glo that I'm going to try and find some of my early derelict postings on the subject, so I don't have to saddle myself with the job of coming up with all of it again. If I remember right, I cited some materials to bolster my argument, and I'm too much of a laggard to relish reliving that task just now. Anyway, when I turn to the next post from the next mystery poster, probably all will be revealed, and we can stop wondering whether K was actually communicating in Ojai with the historical Buddha, or whether that Khoutoomi fellow was just pulling the wool over his eyes. All kidding aside, one thing is pretty clear, which is that if he(K) was actually offered the opportunity to channel or embody Maitri, he turned it down. My own feeling is that Fear, not courage was in the cat seat on this one. Was it Annie Besant or Colonel Leadbetter who was really calling the shots?(I say, Col. Mustard did it with the candlestick in the library.) Apparently, kidding is back. yours in the bonds, eric , "prashanti" <prashanti@n...> wrote: > > - > It was a good book, getting to know the very young K. Funny how Annie Besant > and the whole group thought he was being prepared thru this to be their next world leader, and actaully he ended up leaving the Theosophical Society because of what he learned. > > Hi Gloria, > > Two things : I love all your Hafiz postings, and have forwarded many of them onto another list. Many there have expressed their delight in them - thank you! > > With respect, I would like to offer a differing opinion regarding K. I strongly believe that he was indeed being groomed not as a "world leader" but rather as a 'vehicle' for the world teacher (Maitreya)who did overshadow him on several occasions > > In 1945 Maitreya announced that he would instead come in person - when certain conditions were met by humanity. > > Blessings > Sai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2002 Report Share Posted February 11, 2002 All kidding aside, one thing is pretty clear, which is that if he(K) was actually offered the opportunity to channel or embody Maitri, he turned it down. My own feeling is that Fear, not courage was in the cat seat on this one. Was it Annie Besant or Colonel Leadbetter who was really calling the shots?(I say, Col. Mustard did it with the candlestick in the library.) Apparently, kidding is back. Besant and most of these Theosophical people were probly off their respective rockers. As l recall, both Krishnamurti and Leadbetter increasingly came to believe this toward the end. jerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2002 Report Share Posted February 11, 2002 , GCWein1111@a... wrote: > Besant and most of these Theosophical people were probly > off their > respective rockers. As l recall, both Krishnamurti and Leadbetter > increasingly came to believe this toward the end. > > jerry One of the stories goes, J.K. and his brother were sexually abused when children -- if true, that would confirm the "off the rocker" story :-). Cheers, Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2002 Report Share Posted February 12, 2002 > >The doctors said: > >'Bhagavan, we told you it would be painful.' > > > >Bhagavan replied: > >'Yes, the body experienced pain. But am I the body?'" > > Another of Ramana's teachings is that the body is inside the mind, that the body and its sensations is inside the mind and not vice versa. When the body sensations are looked directly at, they do reveal themselves to be as distanced from (or as close to) the true self as all other thoughts and sense impressions. When that understanding becomes clear, the ability to feel pain may also change radically, making the body very resistant or unfeeling towards physical pain, which may further emphasizing that "I am not the body" and deepen the experience of bodylessness. Being largely insensitive to physical impressions may create a set of problem themselves, in the same way as ppl who lose feeling in parts of their bodies or the ability to feel pain due to nerve damage may not know when they're overstraining a body part and be sustain injury because of that, but with some attention to the body, that's not a problem that can't be made less. Love, Amanda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2002 Report Share Posted February 12, 2002 - mumblecat2000 Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:23 PM Re: "Am I the body?" > >The doctors said:> >'Bhagavan, we told you it would be painful.'> >> >Bhagavan replied:> >'Yes, the body experienced pain. But am I the body?'"> >Another of Ramana's teachings is that the body is inside the mind, that the body and its sensations is inside the mind and not vice versa. When the body sensations are looked directly at, they do reveal themselves to be as distanced from (or as close to) the true self as all other thoughts and sense impressions. When that understanding becomes clear, the ability to feel pain may also change radically, making the body very resistant or unfeeling towards physical pain, which may further emphasizing that "I am not the body" and deepen the experience of bodylessness.Being largely insensitive to physical impressions may create a set of problem themselves, in the same way as ppl who lose feeling in parts of their bodies or the ability to feel pain due to nerve damage may not know when they're overstraining a body part and be sustain injury because of that, but with some attention to the body, that's not a problem that can't be made less. Love,Amanda.Hi Amanda, There are some fascinating comparisons here with what is known about phantom pain, when a missing limb appears to be hurting. There is a map of the body within the brain, so when the missing part is felt, it's sometimes because a nearby section of the brain has taken over that "foot section" for example. What fails to get back to the brain is the signal from the foot to relax, when there is an imagined cramp. The brain can be "fooled" into thinking it got the signal by the person getting into a mirror box, where the eyes can see the other foot is relaxed. Anyway, it confirms that the body is inside the mind. I read wierd stuff, don't I? Gloria/join All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, sights, perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and exist in and subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves rising are not different than the ocean, all things arising from Awareness are of the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come and go but is always Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart Is. Jnanis know the Heart to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A true devotee relishes in the Truth of Self-Knowledge, spontaneously arising from within into It Self. Welcome all to a.Your use of is subject to the Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.