Guest guest Posted March 24, 2002 Report Share Posted March 24, 2002 Hello Antoine, yes, it's a paradox class that is well known to logicians. It is one of the reasons for the use of self-referential all-quantifiers being inadmissible in current axiomatic systems of predicate logic. Sorry if this sounds too much like jargon, but it's true. :-) Kindest regards, Michael > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: Antoine Carre [antoinecarre] > Gesendet: Friday, March 22, 2002 03:52 > An: > Betreff: God and Persons/hello > > > << Don't you see that by postulating unreality for one side you > are eo ipso > postulating it for the other? >> > Michael > > Hello Michael and all, its been a while, > > This last statement caught my attention, a nice paradox that cannot be > resolved. > > If I can postulate unreality for one side and ipso facto I am postulating > it for the other. That should make of me a God, this God Jesus is talking > about to Socrates (thanks for the link Jb > > Yet if I am God how can I postulate which is not me, unreality? > > Unless I am already unreality, but then who his postulating unreality? > > A nice paradox whose true meaning cannot be shared, I believe... > > Yet time is a valued ambrosia that can be shared... > > << I don't really know why I want to embrace everyone. It just seems like > the thing to do. The most important and urgent thing to do. Says Harsha>> > > And its nice to share this time with you, > > Antoine > > > > /join > > > > > > All paths go somewhere. No path goes nowhere. Paths, places, > sights, perceptions, and indeed all experiences arise from and > exist in and subside back into the Space of Awareness. Like waves > rising are not different than the ocean, all things arising from > Awareness are of the nature of Awareness. Awareness does not come > and go but is always Present. It is Home. Home is where the Heart > Is. Jnanis know the Heart to be the Finality of Eternal Being. A > true devotee relishes in the Truth of Self-Knowledge, > spontaneously arising from within into It Self. Welcome all to > a. > > > > Your use of is subject to > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2002 Report Share Posted March 25, 2002 << Hello Antoine, yes, it's a paradox class that is well known to logicians. It is one of the reasons for the use of self-referential all-quantifiers being inadmissible in current axiomatic systems of predicate logic. Sorry if this sounds too much like jargon, but it's true. :-) >> You don't have to be sorry Michael, It must be why the Babylon tower comes with the myth tied to it that it will collapse at one point or the other. When mathematicians will have found a substance to give meaning to ( 1 divided by 0 ) they will have found their glue to stop the Babylonian tower from wanting to collapse in its striving for the unreachable infinite they auto defined in the seed of the development of math's. Antoine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.