Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Mouni Sadhu - Let us not be misguided

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Vicki,

 

I am well aware of the contents of Mouni Sadhu's book which I love and have

read many times. It's just that out of the many excellent pages of that book

unfortunately you selected a passage where the author makes a mistake:

 

"Unless leaders of such organizations are true Masters - perfect men - their

teachings and books can be little better than the mental speculation of a

layman... And until now I have never seen a Master running an organization

or a business."

 

Mouni Sadhu gives incorrect guidance here. A Master is not obliged by

spiritual law to keep away from organizational work; being unconcerned about

it is no yardstick for perfection. On the contrary, some Masters seem to

come on Earth with the express purpose of building a spiritual organization,

as did Jesus, and Swami Shankara, and Paramahansa Yogananda. To a degree

this might also be said of the Buddha.

 

Kindest regards,

 

Michael

 

 

 

 

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----

Von: viorica weissman [viorica]

Gesendet: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 18:37

An:

Betreff: Re : Mouni Sadhu - Let us not be misguided

 

 

Dear Michael ,

 

I read that selection from Mouni Sadhu's book again and again

trying to understand where any single implication against Budha,

Jesus, Shankara ...might be and I must admit I am baffled.

There is none.

 

As I understood you read the book , so you know he quotes freely

Christian mystics,Jesus,Kabbalah ...Not to mention that the book

has an apendix which is a very good selection of verses from

Viveka Chudamani.

Never ever did Mouni Sadhu write in this book anything that could imply

what you implied.

 

On the contrary.

 

That selected quote was an answer to somebody who asked him

a simple question and Mouni Sadhu answered his opinion.

It might be seen as a warning to help a spiritual seeker ,

who perhaps didn't know whom to trust and whom to trust not.

Discriminating is part of the way.

 

Your implications have nothing to do with Mouni Sadhu ,

nor with me.

 

Very kind regards ,

vicki.

 

 

 

 

Dear Vicki,

 

it is wonderful that you are attracted to Sri Ramana's perfect simplicity

and equanimity (and probably much more than that). I have to admit, though,

that I feel a little bit sad about the implication that beings like Buddha,

Jesus, Swami Shankara, P. Yogananda, and others who organized or gave

instruction to disciples or preached to the multitudes, are not Masters

according to your quote. Do you think Masters have to fit into any such

molds? I know it is not true.

 

The great advaitist, Swami Shankara, is often referred to in religious

literature as the "great organizer". He worked his feet off to revitalize

the ancient swami order all over India, teaching and engaging in public

disputations, founding the four maths, and laying the organizational basis

for a gigantic religious organization from which all swamis derive their

legitimacy to this day. According to Mouni Sadhu's quote he could not have

been a Master. And yet he was a great Master, revered even by Sri Ramana

himself, as you well know.

 

The search for the Divine is ultimately between the soul and God only, and

that may be why most of us do not like any organization to interfere. I can

understand this very well, because I feel the same way. But if we look

around, we see that most teachings have some kind of organization around

them, which has been either initiated or at least tolerated by the person

that inspired it. This also includes Sri Ramanasramam in Tiruvannamalai;

they have now expanded even into the US and Canada. They are also selling

books and videos, aren't they, and have a website and get donations etc. And

why not? I believe it is good and proper that there be some kind of

organization. Otherwise, how would people learn about Sri Ramana?

 

"Organization is the hive, God is the honey."

 

Kindest regards,

 

Michael

 

 

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----

Von: viorica weissman [viorica]

Gesendet: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 22:43

An:

Betreff: Re: Mouni Sadhu - Let us not be misguided.

 

 

Dear Michael,

 

Indeed I owe you the pleasure of having read this book ;

at your recommendation I began searching for it and fortunately

a friend of mine had it and I read it some months ago.

 

Why I posted this particular paragraph ?

You see, when one is attracted by a Master of such a

perfect simplicity,equanimity as Ramana Maharshi ,

it is very hard if not impossible to accept the form of organized

teaching whoever might be the leading master.

 

I am sorry to dissapoint you with this , but if you really

wish to express your opinion on this theme on those other two lists ,

you could do so ; At your request I could however forward your

reply but I wouldn't be able to answer instead of you

if other members would have to say anything to you and

would like to hear your answers; so please excuse me for this;

 

Besides, unfortunately, at the level of many great organizations

spiritual misguiding is a fact.

It is only natural that one who loves Ramana and found one's

guru in him to doubt such things.

 

As about others - just playing their worldly roles as kings

or beggers or whatever.

vicki

> Dear Vicki,

>

> I very much appreciate Mouni Sadhu's book - remember I had recommended it

to

> you a long time ago on this list, when you did not know it yet. I think

it's

> a wonderful book of great depth, one of my favorites for more than thirty

> years, and I am very glad to know that it has been reprinted in a small

> edition recently.

>

> However, in saying that there has never been a Master who has run an

> organization, Mouni Sadhu is sadly misguided himself. I will not speak of

my

> own Guru, Paramahansa Yogananda. But let us remember that King Janaka, one

> of the illumined rishis, ran a whole country; that Sri Krishna, though a

> great avatar, performed the duties of a noble ruler and also as the

> commander-in-chief in the dreadful battle of Kurukshetra; and that the

whole

> swami order was completely reorganized in all of India by Swami Shankara.

>

> I love the wonderful quotes that you are posting here and elsewhere, but

> part of this quote is completely amiss.

>

> Kindest regards,

>

> Michael

>

> PS. I would be thankful if you could consider posting my reply on the

other

> two lists, too.

> Thank you very much.

>

>

> >

>

> You ask : 'What about the numerous initiatory societies existing

> in the modern world ?'

>

> Let us not be misguided. If you want to give me a glass of water,

> you must have water to give. Unless leaders of such organizations

> are true Masters - perfect men - their teachings and books can be

> little better than the mental speculation of a layman.

>

> The teaching must be supported by the lives of the techers and give

> us an unmistakable example of true realizarion. Your own Self will never

> accept anything less . And until now I have never seen a Master

> running an organization or a business. Think it over and the answer

> will come of itself.

>

> In Days of Great Peace , Mouni Sadhu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

MikeSuesserott wrote:

> Dear Vicki,

>

> I am well aware of the contents of Mouni Sadhu's book which I love and have

> read many times. It's just that out of the many excellent pages of that book

> unfortunately you selected a passage where the author makes a mistake:

>

> "Unless leaders of such organizations are true Masters - perfect men - their

> teachings and books can be little better than the mental speculation of a

> layman... And until now I have never seen a Master running an organization

> or a business."

>

> Mouni Sadhu gives incorrect guidance here. A Master is not obliged by

> spiritual law to keep away from organizational work; being unconcerned about

> it is no yardstick for perfection. On the contrary, some Masters seem to

> come on Earth with the express purpose of building a spiritual organization,

> as did Jesus, and Swami Shankara, and Paramahansa Yogananda. To a degree

> this might also be said of the Buddha.

>

> Kindest regards,

>

> Michael

>

 

I agree, leaders of organizations do not have to be "perfect" in order to

foster concepts

that are eminently superior to the mental speculations of a layman, and I

find it highly

unlikely that he had, at the time of his statement, never personally seen a

Master running an organization or business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

It depends on what is in your mind when talking about organization

and business. I think Mouni Sadhu has meant it in a negative sense

having something special and negative experiences in mind, but he

made the mistake generalizing it.

 

A true master will not look for benefit to enrich himself - for that

he will not run a bussiness. But there are masters which built up

organizations as they feel there is a need. Also in Zen there is

something as "organization" round the Roshi. In wich sense Jesus can

be connected with the organization "church" is a question which still

caused a lot of controversities in church history. Has he founded the

church? Neither "yes" nor "no" is the right answer to this.

Ramana can't be brought together with business and organization as

such, but he was also interested in the construction of the different

buildings even planing them.

 

I think there is a wide field with all thinkable possibilities how a

master can be connected with bussiness and organization which goes

from no contact at all up to being a planning organizator and

businessman.

But the real master is the Self and as such has nothing to do with

organisation as bussiness.

Gabriele

 

, "viorica weissman" <viorica@z...> wrote:

> Dear Michael,

> You associate Jesus with 'organization and business'?

> You associate Buddha with 'organization and business'?

> You associate Ramana Maharshi with 'organization and business'?

> In Ramana Maharshi's case his devotees organized themselves around

him.

> and continued after his passing.

> I could go on like this ....

>

> My consternation knows no limit.

>

> vicki

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...