True Human Beings

[Guest guest]

Only imposters....

In the universe of Non-Duality, there can only be a True Human Being.

:-)

Love,

Zenbob

[Guest guest]

, zen2wrk@a... wrote:

 

There are no true human beings--

Only imposters....

In the universe of Non-Duality, there can only be a True Human Being.

 

 

....."Non-dual does not mean not dual."

 

~ Adyashanti

 

 

To claim the universe is non-dual,

without acknowledging the dual,

is an error.

To claim the universe is dual,

without acknowledging the non-dual,

is an error.

Claimless, the True Human Being

opens eyes in innocent wonder at the

Mystery of Itself.

 

LovingKindness prevails.

 

 

LoveAlways,

 

b

[Guest guest]

In the universe of Non-Duality, there can only be a True Human Being.

Forest and trees, Bob. I was suggesting the super-unified state of

consciousness where all beings, despite their duality and

separateness would be mentally unified in their agreement on what

represents a "human being" in the spiritual or active sense.

If all are in total accord, then a state of supreme "human beingness" is the result.

>From that point it would be easy to suggest and end to war, crime, etc.

Peace,

Blessings,

Zenbob

[Guest guest]

, zen2wrk@a... wrote:

>I was suggesting the super-unified state of consciousness where all

beings, despite their duality and separateness would be mentally

unified in their agreement on what represents a "human being" in the

spiritual or active sense.

If all are in total accord, then a state of supreme "human beingness"

is the result.

 

 

....Dear Brother,

 

this is an interesting notion, but would you be willing to consider

the possibility that, in unity consciousness, there is no such

fiction of beings in conceptual agreement, since this state is prior

to conceptuality?

of course, this makes no sense to mind, but must actually be a living

experience, which is what i was trying to get at in the original

discussion on becoming truly human.

 

 

LoveAlways,

 

b

[Guest guest]

there is no such fiction of beings in conceptual agreement, since this

state is prior to conceptuality?

I would, Bob, except that to posit a state "prior to conceptuality" is

not logical. Any effort to suggest any state that pre-existed

Consciousness is not consistent with the timeless Unification of a

constant state of Super Consciousness.

If we are focusing on the issue of individuation, a priori and then

"ex post facto" (after the facts)

menaing...the separation into the illusion of duality then the

re-entry into the state of Unity, then you are correct, except that

any such "unity" must contain always the full reality of both unified

and separate consciousness AT ALL TIMES (actually it is just one super

moment) and as such, one can just as easily speak of the "separate

consciousnesses" as well as the "Unified Consciousness" which is in

fact, the result of the unification.

Admittedly these are all deep, quantum waters, but the state/non-state

issue is ultimately real and does effect the universe--in that what we

bleieve ultimately effects our state of existence, and that the

ultimate Unity depends on individual consciousness just as much as

individual consciousness depends on the Super Unity.

Blessings,

Love,

Zenbob