Guest guest Posted October 9, 2002 Report Share Posted October 9, 2002 Groups Home - SBC - Help Welcome, carolynmaloneyrrmt (carolynmaloneyrrmt · reiki) Start a Group - My Groups - Account Info - Sign Out reikiandspiritualhealingcoalition · Nat'l Reiki & Spiritual Healing Coalition Group Member [ Edit My Membership ] <http://us.a1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/a/ya/_expert/free_love_120x90.gif> Home I though this should be available for everyone to read and understand what is happening legislative wize. My group defeated House of Representatives (TEXAS) bill 367 regarding regulatio of reiki and now we have this. AND guess who's on the board?? Carolyn Texas Independent Reiki Practitioners Association Charter Board Member - since 1998 John Steele <moonowl@c...> Mon Sep 30, 2002 2:55 pm Legislation Update on Unlicensed Healer's Legislation Thought I'd forward this to those who might be interested. Unfortunately, it's true: William Rand is supporting the regulation of Reiki via these bills. Here's the link to the company that is behind pushing these bills. He's on the board of directors. http://www.nationalhealthfreedom.org/index.htm Thanks, John E. Steele United Reiki Legal Index http://www.sacredpath.org/html/reiki/legal/ webmaster Legislation Update on Unlicensed Healer's Legislation: *New York's A8704 and S4857 *New: Michigan Bill fizzles - Late Bulletin *National Push For Legislation - damaging to spiritual healers *Legislation Opposed by Unlicensed Healers by Ellen Louise Kahne A bill (A8704 and S4857) has been introduced into both houses of the New York State legislature which would affect all unlicensed healers, including those who heal in faith. These bills have been strongly opposed by thousands of consumers and unlicensed healers through a statewide grassroots letter writing, email and phone campaign to public officials organized by the New York State Healer's Empowerment Coalition and other groups and individuals, because they threaten to violate basic constitutional rights and freedoms of healers. Healers throughout the state have complained about not being "consulted" or "informed" on the formulation of the bills. The controversial bills, which contain eleven pages of punitive measures against healers, are being promoted as "consumer protection" legislation. A8704 and S4857 seek to override first, fourth and fifth amendment constitutional protections of unlicensed healers, including all spiritual or religious healers, rights to privacy, due process, and against self incrimination, which would be superseded by this proposed state legislation. The bills, which would short circuit New York's legal protections against the practice of medicine without licensing, are being promoted by professional lobbyists for homeopaths who want the right to practice medicine (to "evaluate" and "treat") without having either medical licensing or qualifications, and by a few practitioners who omit or refuse to obtain required massage or medical licensing and qualifications, even though these healers want the right to "diagnose,treat,evaluate,prescribe" or "manipulate tissue" in their respective disciplines without licensing or demonstrating competency before any state regulatory boards. The proposed legislation, which would allow "anonymous" consumer complaints, would be costly to enforce through the New York State Health Commissioner, and would infringe directly upon spiritual and traditional practices. Christian Science, Anthroposophy, Reiki, along with a catchall of unlicensed healing modalities including (but not limited to) "food, food supplements, nutrients, yoga, Qi Gong, aroma therapy, heat, cold, water, color, touch and light, (native American and other) culturally traditional healing practices, folk practices," etc. would be affected. Typical of so-called "health freedom" legislation which has been proposed recently in Michigan, and California, New York's proposed bills are a poor, ineffective and unnecessary piece of legislation which would threaten healers with unfair enforcement procedures, violate legal rights and protections and raise costs of alternative healing. Unlicensed healers could face fines, disciplinary actions, or permanently lose the right to practice without due process, due to anonymous or false claims or failure to answer a complaint (lost in the mail). Opponents cite sufficient state legal protections to address any abuses under current civil and criminal statutes as added reasons to oppose A8704 and S4857. Historically, legal action against unlicensed healers has been very rare. Lobbyists, who have used scare tactics to encourage support of this legislation in the spiritual healing community, could not cite one instance of civil or criminal violation for the practice of Reiki healing in the United States or U.S. territories since 1937, when Reiki spiritual laying on of hands healing arrived on these shores from Japan. Ellen Louise Kahne is the founder of Reiki University® and Reiki Peace Network® and the New York State Healer's Empowerment Coalition. For more information on how to oppose A8704 and S4857, see www.ReikiPeaceNetwork.com or contact the following: email: HealNet or phone: 1-877-HealNet (877-432-5638) (Note: The above article appeared in To Your Health Magazine, September/October issue). Game Called For Lack of Interest Michigan Bill fizzles - Late Bulletin According to Michigan sources, efforts to mobilize legislation to regulate unlicensed healers in the state of Michigan have collapsed because of lack of interest. A meeting was called in the past several weeks and a (currently) non functional website link was set up by the homeopathic lobby for so-called "health freedom" legislation in Michigan but did not generate enough interest or support to push legislative proposals (punitive to spiritual healers and teachers) forward in that state, which were to be modeled on similar attempts in New York and California. The Michigan, California and New York proposed bills are part of a national push by the homeopathic lobby and other unlicensed healing groups who currently fall under massage licensing statutes (that is, they "manipulate tissue" or in some way fit the legal definition of massage) to secure the right to engage in medical practice (to "evaluate" and "treat") illness without either medical qualifications or appropriate licensing. This is at the heart of New York's proposed legislation, A8704 and S4857. Please note: Reiki healing is not massage and does not fit the legal definition of massage ("manipulation of tissues, use of oils, devices, etc.") and this has been recognized by New York's massage board which ruled, Feb. 23, 1999 that Reiki is not massage (see the front page of the Wall St. Journal). These bills (and regulation of Reiki spiritual healing) have been openly supported by William Rand, head of the Center For Reiki Training. Mr. Rand, a Michigan Reiki Master, serves on the board of Trustees for homeopath-attorney Diane Miller's National Health Freedom Coalition and Rand has publicly reversed his (former) long standing opposition to regulating Reiki healing, despite the fact that Reiki is not in any jeopardy of prosecution, nor has the practice of Reiki ever been prosecuted in the United States, or U.S. territories. Reiki groups and individual practitioners and Masters in New York, Florida, Texas and other states have overwhelmingly opposed any regulation of Reiki and have organized and fought to insure that Reiki empowerments, and options to choose training and Reiki healing with the practitioner or Reiki Master of the client's selection remain open, available and affordable to all. When asked repeatedly (by email and phone), attorney Diane Miller, Mr. Rand, attorney Carolyn Rider, head of NYNHP, which is pushing for New York's punitive bill, could not cite a single instance of prosecution of the constitutionally (U.S. first amendment) protected practice of Reiki in any state, or municipality since 1937, when Hawayo Takata studied, then transported Reiki healing from Japan to Hawaii, and later to the U.S. mainland. So, why is this proposed legislation (including New York's 11 pages of punitive measures against all unlicensed alternative healers, including Christian Scientists and all those who pray and lay on hands in faith, hold sweat lodges and spiritual healing retreats, etc.) necessary to be passed at all? There are sufficient laws on the books to prosecute fraud, criminal and/or civil abuse, etc. in every state and on the federal level. These proposals are vital only for unlicensed homeopaths and healers who seek to openly practice medicine without a license or proper training and qualifications (which is illegal in every state) and to water down this protective state legislation against diagnosis (read "evaluation") and "treatment" without medical licensure. The practice of medicine by unqualified unlicensed practitioners is a danger to the public Reiki is spiritual healing which does not harm, nor do Reiki practitioners "diagnoseevaluate" or "treat" illness unless medically qualified and licensed to do so. Homeopathy and naturopathy can be practiced (currently) under alternative medical laws by qualified medically licensed and supervised MDs and nurse practitioners, etc. in New York, for instance, which has passed a complementary and alternative care bill for licensed practitioners. Yoga Masters, native American healers, Qi Gong instructors, Reiki Masters and a catchall of unlicensed self improvement, and spiritual modality practitioners, their students and clients are in danger of losing their constitutionally protected rights to privacy, due process, spiritual practice, and against self incrimination according to New York's proposed punitive legislation. The New York assembly bill is currently in the Higher Education Committee, chaired by Assemblyman Ed Sullivan. All those who wish to express concern and opposition to the bill (that's the entire Reiki community) are urged to contact the following by mail and phone, as well as by visiting their Albany and local offices: Contact New York Legislators NOW!! You can locate your assembly person and/or access bill A8704: www.assembly.state.ny.us You can locate your NY State senator and/or access bill S4857: www.senate.state.ny.us Governor George E. Pataki State Capitol Albany, NY 12224 (regarding S4857) (regarding A 8704) Hon. Joseph Bruno, NY Senate Maj. leader Hon. Sheldon Silver, NY Assembly Speaker 909 Legislative Office Building 932 Legislative Office Building Albany, NY 11247 Albany, NY 12248 (bill sponsors A8704- NY Assembly): (bill sponsor S4857 - NY Senate): Rep. Michael Gianaris Sen. Kemp Hannon 22-77 31st St., Suite 107 1600 Stewart Ave., Suite 315 Astoria, NY 11105 Westbury, NY 11590 and Rep. Vivian Cook 142-15 Rockaway Blvd. Jamaica, NY 11432 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.