Guest guest Posted November 11, 2002 Report Share Posted November 11, 2002 The only thing at issue is the never ending suspense that something really true might be said at some point, if the key issues are revisited enough. As soon as one issue is resolved, Gary connects it back to a previous issue that you had thought was resolved, but now is again treated as if there is something new to be said. It's a great exercise in the recursive futility of self-referencing thought -- a conceptual merry-go-round always curling back on itself ... Vanity of vanities -- all is vanity sayeth the preacher! All my love's in vein, Dan , Gregory Goode <goode@D...> wrote: > I did join - I actually like all that stuff. The archives -- I see -- I sense the dialectic energy there, but don't really know what was at issue. I see that Gary drives it by posting stuff, then others answer. Next time he does, I'll pitch in. Thanks! > > --Greg > > At 04:27 AM 11/11/02 +0000, fewtch wrote: > > >Hi Greg, > > > >So far it's mostly been a dialog between Dan-ji and Sri Gary Merrill- > >ji... I've jumped in on occasion. Ostentibly it has a topic, but > >most of the discussion has been all over the map and like Dan said, > >leaning heavily toward the philosophical/conceptual rather than the > >practical. > > > >The map is restated again and again, using different words, using the > >same words... the 'territory' has never once been touched (or, the > >talk is the territory -- same difference). > > > >You're always free to & take a look at the archives :-). > > > >Peace, > > > >Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.