Guest guest Posted December 27, 2002 Report Share Posted December 27, 2002 your problem is with objectivity. whats objective about red is the colors that make it, but it still takes those same colors every time. now there are different degrees of mixtures of those colors, but the same colors are used. All truth is narrow all truth can be objective/ relative truth but this is a matter of semantics but morally Truth becomes entirely objective to say otherwise is to make an objective statement kind of like this statement: "you're not tolerant if your tolerant of intolerance" what do i mean? Well lets say I don't believe in God and I don't believe in God because of the evil in the world And God can't be evil so God doesn't exist saying you don't believe in something because of something else. Evil can't be used as an argument against God because you would have no way to know what was evil accept by some objective moral truth that you compare it to. led me put in another way Saying you don't believe in God because of evil is like saying you don't believe in a yard stick because the football stadium is 100 yards long. you would have no way to know the stadium was 100 yards long unless there was a yard stick to measure it with... --- "John Logan <johnrloganis" <johnrloganis wrote: > You don't get it yet... > > it is red! One red among many. Many shades of red. > All of them > nominally called red for the sake of communication. > There is no one > red which is the correct, true and only red. Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.