Guest guest Posted April 16, 2003 Report Share Posted April 16, 2003 the physiology of intellect in Ramana Maharshi's enlightenment: "When the mind, having pure sattva as its characteristic, remain attending to the aham sphurana, which is the sign of the forthcoming direct experience of the Self, the downward-facing Heart becomes upward-facing and remains in the form of That. This aforesaid attention to the source of the aham sphurana alone is the path. When thus attended to, Self, the reality, alone will remain shining in the centre of the Heart as I-am-I." from: <http://www.davidgodman.org/rteach/iandii1.shtml> the turning up is a term used about the petals of the lotuses at the chakras. here is the Amrit-nadi leading from the Crown-chakra to the Heart-cave down ward: after Enlightenment, wich happens in the Crown chakra... as E settles: >From No Mind I Am The Self.. David Godman The experience of the Self #6 Q: Some people claim to have had brief experiences of the Self. Is thisvery common? Saradamma: Many people make such claims but I doubt if more than a few of them have had a genuine experience of the Self. Because most people have never had a direct experience of the Self they think that blissful or peaceful states of mind are glimpses of the Self. The only real experience of the Self occurs when the mind enters the Heart. Imagine a cave with a fierce demon in it. If you go in to investigate, one of three things may happen: the demon may kill you, you may escape through the cave entrance, or you may break your head on the cave roof while you are trying to escape and die as a result. Taking the mind into the Heart-cave is a little like this. Either the Self destroys the mind completely, or the mind enjoys the bliss of the Self for a while before escaping to the brain again, or the strain of the experience is too much for the body and death results. In the last case there will probably be a rebirth in one of the higher worlds. Most people who claim to have experienced the Self have not even taken their minds near to the entrance of the Heart-cave. And even if the mind does go into the Heart, there is still an 'I' which is experiencing the bliss of the Self. The true experience of the Self only happens when the mind is completely absent, either temporarily as in samadhi, or permanently, as in Self-realization. Both of these experiences are very rare. It is very difficult to make the mind go into the Heart. Mostly it is too afraid of its own death to even approach the entrance. The mental experiences of peace, bliss and stillness, which devotees claim to experience usually, take place outside the Heart. They are all in the mind. People who think that these experiences are the reality of the Self are only deluding themselves. Love, Karta from my page: <http://us.geocities.com/mi_nok/realiz.html> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2003 Report Share Posted April 17, 2003 Dear Karta: I would like to know did the following quote come from the David Godman link or did it come from the Book No Mind I am the Self: > the turning up is a term used about > the petals of the lotuses at the > chakras. > > here is the Amrit-nadi leading from > the Crown-chakra to the Heart-cave > down ward: after Enlightenment, > wich happens in the Crown chakra... > as E settles: If it came from the book No Mind I am the Self, do you know what page? The reason I am asking this is because someone who lives here in Southern Nevada sent me an email within the last couple of weeks asking me what did Sri Ramana Maharshi have to say about the amrit nadi. So I looked up nadis and yoga etc. in the book Talks and I emailed the quotes to her. I will also forward the above quote to her, however I would like to know the source and if possible the page number so that I can see the context. I am not interested in Nadis, however she is interested so I will forward this to her. Thank you, take care, with Love, Michael L. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2003 Report Share Posted April 17, 2003 "Michael L." <uarelove> wrote: > Dear Karta: > > I would like to know did the following quote come from the David > Godman link or did it come from the Book No Mind I am the Self: > ==================================== IS AMONG MY COMMENTS: please follow the "" > > the turning up is a term used about > > the petals of the lotuses at the > > chakras. > > > > here is the Amrit-nadi leading from > > the Crown-chakra to the Heart-cave > > down ward: after Enlightenment, > > wich happens in the Crown chakra... > > as E settles: ==================================== > > If it came from the book No Mind I am the Self, do you know what page? > > The reason I am asking this is because someone who lives here in > Southern Nevada sent me an email within the last couple of weeks > asking me what did Sri Ramana Maharshi have to say about the amrit > nadi. So I looked up nadis and yoga etc. in the book Talks and I > emailed the quotes to her. I will also forward the above quote to > her, however I would like to know the source and if possible the page > number so that I can see the context. I am not interested in Nadis, > however she is interested so I will forward this to her. > > Thank you, > > take care, > > with Love, > > Michael L. Love, Karta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2003 Report Share Posted April 17, 2003 dear Michael, I've problems with my keyboard I'll get back to you shotrly Love, Karta ps: maybe someone can look up the page numbers <group@s...> wrote: > "Michael L." <uarelove> wrote: > > Dear Karta: > > > > I would like to know did the following quote come from the David > > Godman link or did it come from the Book No Mind I am the Self: > > > ==================================== > THESE ARE AMONG MY COMMENTS: please follow > the "" > > > > the turning up is a term used about > > > the petals of the lotuses at the > > > chakras. > > > > > > here is the Amrit-nadi leading from > > > the Crown-chakra to the Heart-cave > > > down ward: after Enlightenment, > > > wich happens in the Crown chakra... > > > as E settles: > ==================================== > > > > > If it came from the book No Mind I am the Self, do you know what page? > > > > The reason I am asking this is because someone who lives here in > > Southern Nevada sent me an email within the last couple of weeks > > asking me what did Sri Ramana Maharshi have to say about the amrit > > nadi. So I looked up nadis and yoga etc. in the book Talks and I > > emailed the quotes to her. I will also forward the above quote to > > her, however I would like to know the source and if possible the page > > number so that I can see the context. I am not interested in Nadis, > > however she is interested so I will forward this to her. > > > > Thank you, > > > > take care, > > > > with Love, > > > > Michael L. > > Love, Karta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2003 Report Share Posted April 17, 2003 > ps: maybe someone can look up the page > numbers The final section of Karta's original message in this thread (beginning "Q. Some people claim to have had...") appears on page 196 of the second edition of "No Mind -- I Am The Self." Note: This is chapter 19, not chapter 6, of that book. - "Era" <group <RamanaMaharshi> Thursday, April 17, 2003 9:54 PM [RamanaMaharshi] Re: the physiology of intellect > > dear Michael, I've problems with my > keyboard I'll get back to you shotrly > > Love, Karta > > ps: maybe someone can look up the page > numbers > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2003 Report Share Posted April 18, 2003 om namo bhagavate sri ramanaya Dear Michael et al, > Karta wrote: > "When the mind, having pure sattva > as its characteristic, remain > attending to the aham sphurana, > which is the sign of the forthcoming > direct experience of the Self, > the downward-facing Heart becomes upward-facing and remains in the form > of That. > > This aforesaid attention to the > source of the aham sphurana alone > is the path. When thus attended to, > Self, the reality, alone will remain > shining in the centre of the > Heart as I-am-I." The above quote is from a letter which was sent from Sri Bhagavan to Ganapati Muni in answer to the latter's query about 'ego'. > here is the Amrit-nadi leading from > the Crown-chakra to the Heart-cave > down ward: after Enlightenment, > wich happens in the Crown chakra... > as E settles: Sorry no idea where this quote is from. However regarding this I would point to the following from Maharshi's Gospel: 'The practice of kuNDalinI-yoga, as of any other yoga, is based on concentrated imagination. One may fix one's attention on any of the centres, such as the one between the eyebrows. This is bhAvanA or imaginative contemplation. The final result is that the object on which the aspirant fixes his mind ceases to exist as distinct and separate from the subject.' And the following from Sri Bhagavan, in response to a question as to whether the place between the eyebrows could be the seat of the Self: 'You agree that the Self is the ultimate source of Consciousness and that it subsists equally during all the three states of mind. But see what happens when a person in meditation is overcome by sleep. As the first symptom his head begins to nod; but this could not happen if the Self were between the eyebrows, that centre cannot be called its seat without implying that the Self often forsakes its own place which is absurd. The fact is that the aspirant (sAdhaka) may have his experience at any centre or cakra on which he concentrates his mind, but that does not make such a centre the seat of the Self.' 'What is true of AjnA, the centre between the eyebrows, is also true of sahasrAra, the brain-centre. If one concentrates on the sahasrAra, the ecstasy of absorption (samAdhi) will follow. But this state is not permanent, because the latent tendencies (vAsanAs) are not destroyed. ...He has to continue his endeavour to eradicate his vAsanAs.' (from Mahadevan's 'Ramana Maharshi, the Sage of Arunacala', p. 167-168) I would add that the Heart is the ultimate Centre and only by reaching this can samAdhi become permanent. The source of the aham-sphurana is the target...'When thus attended to, Self, the reality, alone will remain shining in the centre of the Heart as 'I am I'.' Ever Yours in Sri Bhagavan, Miles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2003 Report Share Posted April 21, 2003 Miles Wright <ramana.bhakta@v...> wrote: > > > om namo bhagavate sri ramanaya > > > Dear Michael et al, > > > Karta wrote: > > "When the mind, having pure sattva > > as its characteristic, remain > > attending to the aham sphurana, > > which is the sign of the forthcoming > > direct experience of the Self, > > the downward-facing Heart becomes upward-facing and remains in the form > > of That. > > > > This aforesaid attention to the > > source of the aham sphurana alone > > is the path. When thus attended to, > > Self, the reality, alone will remain > > shining in the centre of the > > Heart as I-am-I." > > The above quote is from a letter which was sent from Sri Bhagavan to > Ganapati Muni in answer to the latter's query about 'ego'. > ===================================== > here is the Amrit-nadi leading from > the Crown-chakra to the Heart-cave > down ward: after Enlightenment, > which happens in the Crown chakra.. > as E settles: ==================================== Thank you for the quote bellow. The above quote is my comment; I am working on a sub-page: The Physiology of Realization <http://us.geocities.com/mi_nok/realiz.html> any and all input would be greatly appreciated. One question: besides doing the vichara was Sri Ramana against fine-tuning ones body-mind-spirit unit with meditation, and yoga sadhana? There is a discussion about calling all sadhana "looking for being saved", or looking for a *state* vs understanding: lead by Judi Rhodes who is a selfproclaied Realized being, but her background is no sadhana and she advocates against meditation and all yoga. I thought, that one arrives to the RIGHT understanding by doing vichara and sadhana; fine-tuning the intellect making it able to carry the *Realized Understanding* when it comes I am taking into concideration of what happened to Bhagvan when he came upon his realization... Love, Karta > Sorry no idea where this quote is from. However regarding this I would point > to the following from Maharshi's Gospel: > > 'The practice of kuNDalinI-yoga, as of any other yoga, is based on > concentrated imagination. One may fix one's attention on any of the centres, > such as the one between the eyebrows. This is bhAvanA or imaginative > contemplation. The final result is that the object on which the aspirant > fixes his mind ceases to exist as distinct and separate from the subject.' > > And the following from Sri Bhagavan, in response to a question as to whether > the place between the eyebrows could be the seat of the Self: > > 'You agree that the Self is the ultimate source of Consciousness and that it > subsists equally during all the three states of mind. But see what happens > when a person in meditation is overcome by sleep. As the first symptom his > head begins to nod; but this could not happen if the Self were between the > eyebrows, that centre cannot be called its seat without implying that the > Self often forsakes its own place which is absurd. The fact is that the > aspirant (sAdhaka) may have his experience at any centre or cakra on which > he concentrates his mind, but that does not make such a centre the seat of > the Self.' > > 'What is true of AjnA, the centre between the eyebrows, is also true of > sahasrAra, the brain-centre. If one concentrates on the sahasrAra, the > ecstasy of absorption (samAdhi) will follow. But this state is not > permanent, because the latent tendencies (vAsanAs) are not destroyed. ...He > has to continue his endeavour to eradicate his vAsanAs.' (from Mahadevan's > 'Ramana Maharshi, the Sage of Arunacala', p. 167-168) > > I would add that the Heart is the ultimate Centre and only by reaching this > can samAdhi become permanent. The source of the aham-sphurana is the > target...'When thus attended to, Self, the reality, alone will remain > shining in the centre of the Heart as 'I am I'.' > > Ever Yours in Sri Bhagavan, > Miles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2003 Report Share Posted April 21, 2003 Dear Karta, no, Sri Ramana was not against any practicing of yoga or meditation or other sadhanas like japa or prayer. In contrary, those who felt drawn to he encouraged to do it properly, the best way it can be done. There are even cases he helped with yoga practice and gave instructions. So there is no versus, but in Sri Bhagavan's teaching it is said that all paths will flow into vichara sooner or later naturally as many streams flow into the sea. In Sri Bhagavan Gabriele <<One question: besides doing the vichara was Sri Ramana against fine-tuning ones body-mind-spirit unit with meditation, and yoga sadhana? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2003 Report Share Posted April 22, 2003 om namo bhagavate sri ramanaya Dear Karta, > There is a discussion about calling > all sadhana "looking for being > saved", or looking for a *state* vs understanding: lead by Judi Rhodes > who is a selfproclaied Realized being, > but her background is no sadhana > and she advocates against meditation > and all yoga. This reminds me of something Bhagavan said in Talk 41: D. : J. Krishnamurti says, 'No guru is necessary?' M. : How did he know it? One can say so only after realising but not before. The same applies here. One might say no sadhana 'after realising but not before.' Perhaps one might consider the problem of SAkhAcandrAyah - 'the bough and the moon.' To point out the moon one might first point to a branch and then suggest that the moon is hanging from the end. If we then remain totally enammoured with the branch we have missed the point. Similarly when sadhana becomes all in all and the reason for beginning sadhana is forgotten then sadhana has been of no use. To listen to Bhagavan again: 'Sadhanas are needed so long as one has not realised it. They are for putting an end to obstacles. Finally there comes a stage when a person feels helpless notwithstanding the sadhanas. He is unable to pursue the much-cherished sadhana also. It is then that God's power is realised. The Self reveals itself. (from Talk; 647) > I thought, that one arrives to the > RIGHT understanding by doing vichara > and sadhana; fine-tuning the intellect > making it able to carry the *Realized > Understanding* when it comes It is certainly the case that, without right understanding, the moment is missed. Although the sun is there and very bright, to see it directly you must turn and look. Ever Yours in Sri Bhagavan, Miles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.