Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

More on Kundalini , fantasy,and what it does.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Namaste All,

 

This is a reference to Sri Lakshmana Swami, who it is claimed rec'd

complete enlightenment at the feet of Ramana.'No Mind I am the Self',

by David Godman. p 99, 100.

 

He says the K-Sakti is synonymous with 'Mind' and doesn't rise at the

muladhara but at the Heart Centre, not heart cakra.

 

When Yogis make the K go from the muladhara to the sahasrara it takes

place within their mind or their imagination.

 

This fits with my own feeling that it is only attention that moves,

moves on the concept of different cakras.

 

K is everywhere for it is the Universal Mind. projected by the

Goddess by use of the moving agent Prana. What people experience is

the movemtnt of the pranas. According to Lakshaman one cannot feel K

until the day of realisation.........ONS....Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

saktidasa wrote:

> Namaste All,

>

> This is a reference to Sri Lakshmana Swami, who it is claimed rec'd

> complete enlightenment at the feet of Ramana.'No Mind I am the

Self',

> by David Godman. p 99, 100.

>

> He says the K-Sakti is synonymous with 'Mind' and doesn't rise at

the

> muladhara but at the Heart Centre, not heart cakra.

>

> When Yogis make the K go from the muladhara to the sahasrara it

takes

> place within their mind or their imagination.

>

> This fits with my own feeling that it is only attention that moves,

> moves on the concept of different cakras.

>

> K is everywhere for it is the Universal Mind. projected by the

> Goddess by use of the moving agent Prana. What people experience is

> the movemtnt of the pranas. According to Lakshaman one cannot feel

K

> until the day of realisation.........ONS....Tony.

 

thank you tony this is quite interesting,

the attitude in life of someone on the way to liberation undergoes

changes (even if i never read books about it i would be very

unsensitive to ignore it); one of the major changes mentionned by sri

ramana is the melting of negative emotions in a short time as if

swallowed in the self (my expression), he also mentionned a drastic

reduction of sleep hours and a sustained enthusiasm on life, and many

other "symptoms" that 'something' is going on;

to me (and again i speak only first hand) these new

unexpected 'events' always came (repeatedly) after a 2 to 4 hour

moment of heavy 'alchemical' changes (like suspended in a weird

space) accompanied by physical sensations very localized in the body

that brought me in the morning to a sense of newness and strength.

i never cared analyse it or classify it as k movements because

ramana's views give a good distance to any "happening" but i wouldn't

be surprised if other people did and they are difficult to blame.

in conclusion, i have to say that the common dealing of people with

negative emotions is so childish and painful that i really don't mind

undergoing some evolutionary changes while waiting for the

final "coup de grace".

with kindness and happiness

eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namaste..

 

All I can say is that I have experienced Kundalini Fire movement and

it wasn't in my mind, my fantasy or imagination. One only needs to

experience it once!

 

John L.

 

, "saktidasa" <saktidasa>

wrote:

> Namaste All,

>

> This is a reference to Sri Lakshmana Swami, who it is claimed rec'd

> complete enlightenment at the feet of Ramana.'No Mind I am the

Self',

> by David Godman. p 99, 100.

>

> He says the K-Sakti is synonymous with 'Mind' and doesn't rise at

the

> muladhara but at the Heart Centre, not heart cakra.

>

> When Yogis make the K go from the muladhara to the sahasrara it

takes

> place within their mind or their imagination.

>

> This fits with my own feeling that it is only attention that moves,

> moves on the concept of different cakras.

>

> K is everywhere for it is the Universal Mind. projected by the

> Goddess by use of the moving agent Prana. What people experience is

> the movemtnt of the pranas. According to Lakshaman one cannot feel

K

> until the day of realisation.........ONS....Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, "John Logan"

<johnrloganis> wrote:

> All I can say is that I have experienced Kundalini Fire movement

and

> it wasn't in my mind, my fantasy or imagination. One only needs to

> experience it once!

 

Me too.

 

It was kind of like a full-body orgasm with hallucinations.

 

You know.

 

dave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, "David King" <david.king@p...>

wrote:

> , "John Logan"

> <johnrloganis> wrote:

>

> > All I can say is that I have experienced Kundalini Fire movement

> and

> > it wasn't in my mind, my fantasy or imagination. One only needs

to

> > experience it once!

>

> Me too.

>

> It was kind of like a full-body orgasm with hallucinations.

>

> You know.

>

> dave.

 

Namaste,

 

Exactly as I said moving prana, and hallucinations from wherelse but

the mind.......ONS...Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> >

> > > All I can say is that I have experienced Kundalini Fire

movement

> > and

> > > it wasn't in my mind, my fantasy or imagination. One only needs

> to

> > > experience it once!

> >

> > Me too.

> >

> > It was kind of like a full-body orgasm with hallucinations.

> >

> > You know.

> >

> > dave.

>

> Namaste,

>

> Exactly as I said moving prana, and hallucinations from wherelse

but

> the mind.......ONS...Tony.

 

devi: whats is not in the mind?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear all

You could go on looking to explain for ever but its all words. Some

would say the mind does not exist its just a bundle of thoughts. Its

just our perception of what is going on.

Ultimately God, or whatever label you or I care to use is unknowable

by the mind and when we experienceThat for ourselves I suspect words

are redundant and so is the mind. Of course we still need these in

the world of form.

Those who are Realized on this Satsang no doubt get great pleasure

from the play of consciousness.

I believe the best thing is not to take the mind too seriously. The

moment you take up a mental position you and I are identifying with

an illusion.

My late Kundalini guru Guruji ( Dr Goels) said that Kundalini lived

below Absolute Truth so from that I take it that K is also an

illusion, if a useful one, and only God is. Incidently he also said

we have as much free will as the tethered cow. Ramesh says the same

and we just operate according to our script. I neither agree or

disagree with them.

Thats a disclaimer---- smiling, having fun. Practising for freedom from the egoic mind.

Regards to all

Chris H

> > It was kind of like a full-body orgasm with hallucinations.> > > >

You know.> > > > dave.> > Namaste,> > Exactly as I said moving prana,

and hallucinations from wherelse but > the

mind.......ONS...Tony.devi: whats is not in the mind?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

For those who have not had the experience, they have only words and

opinions.

 

For those who have had the experience, there are no words.

 

And by way of further comment, "full body orgasm with hallucinations"

is a Chakram cleansing event in the lower chakra, it is not the

Kundalini Fire experience, with which there may or may not be visions.

 

I recommend a study of Nisargadatta's THE EXPERIENCE OF NOTHINGNESS

and note that there is process in consciousness, and only in the

Absolute is there no process, no experience, and no CONSCIOUSNESS --

until then there is process, experience and consciousness.

 

See Chapter 7 "When Consciousness Manifests, Duality Appears" in

particular.

 

Word games are fun, but used to invalidate is a form of the

superior/inferior mentality -- and that is in mind, not Brahman, nor

is it Love.

 

Let there be Light on all paths,

may all paths have a heart.

 

John L.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hey John,

 

, "John Logan" <johnrloganis> wrote:

> Word games are fun, but used to invalidate is a form of the

> superior/inferior mentality -- and that is in mind, not Brahman, nor

> is it Love.

 

That's the trouble with words: as soon as you invalidate superior views, your

view becomes superior. ;-)

 

I think Nagarjuna was good at this, a no-view kinda guy.

 

I notice more and more my tendency to contract into a self (versus another self)

when discussing or debating an interesting topic. Hopefully, this can serve as

a reminder to find out who is writing all these words.

 

Thanks for sharing your experience and reading references.

 

namaste,

david.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi John, David

John: Word games are fun, but used to invalidate is a form of the

superior/inferior mentality -- and that is in mind, not Brahman, nor

is it Love.

 

David: That's the trouble with words: as soon as you invalidate

superior views, your view becomes superior. ;-)

I think Nagarjuna was good at this, a no-view kinda guy.

 

Buddha: "By not holding to fixed views

The pure-hearted one, having clarity of vision.

Being freed from all sense-desires,

Is not born again into this world."--- Quote from

the Metta Sutta

:) x 3

 

With Loving Kindness

Simon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...