Guest guest Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 bindu: namaste shambu Shambhu says: Namaste...fine? bindu: yes, you? Shambhu says: mmm...a little more empty than of late bindu: wots on today? Shambhu says: i'm feeling ambivalent about ...well, everything today bindu: Shambhu says: by remaining prior to arising then..theres not a lot of action ... bindu: m bindu: bindu: but what action can be done> no action arises even in action.......... a moving arrow always moves in a space equal to itself so it does not move at all even though it appears to move. Shambhu says: ii find myself reluctant to enter into...anything because any touch...any opinion...any action leads to repercussion and more involvement bindu: ..again how can anything move if all that moves is empty? bindu: who enters what action? bindu: in what do repercussions occur? bindu: in what does involvement happen? bindu: who is involved? Shambhu says: in the sea of endless thought... bindu: what thought where? bindu: no thought arises bindu: emptiness canot arise Shambhu says: because its already substratum? bindu: of course, if everything arises from emptiness its nature is intrinsically empty another way of looking at it might be what SEEMS to arise (But doesn't in reality actually arise) is mere potential only .... it is a sea or ocean of formlessness... Trying to manifest as a definition of the Infinite Absolute... thus it is illusion... Fluid imagination if you like. It is self-arisen potential ... due to the potential of nothingness/emptiness/infinite Being to have, contain or be all and everythign along with all of Time also. Such that it is an eternal illusion, but the infnite absolute is that in which the eternally arising illusion arises such that it transcends TIME and with that eternity also. Shambhu says: by interacting with the illusion...by changing it...by not remaining as witness on the shore of the river....there appears to be a requirement for future immersion...to take the illusion as being real. bindu: ..yes you are right BUT, the problem lies in the answer to the question who is interacting with what? HE too is an illusion Shambhu says: easy to maintain self as question mark while on the banks.... bindu: what banks though? What shore? where? in what? Shambhu says: ah...not a single thing actually is bindu: yes that is true, so who does what, where ? What is done? Shambhu says: god only ...knows, everything is or is not accomplished by itself. bindu: but shambu .. nothing IS... not even itself.......... nothing is happening nothing can happen. Shambhu says: appears to happen.... bindu: yes, but who cares? Shambhu says: m bindu: have you seen the second image at the animated bindu site? bindu: http://www.upnaway.com/~bindu/animbindu/animbindu.htm it equates to mind that is empty but not yet immersed, it is mere concept of i without form, I without form is still "I" you see. Maybe look at the third perhaps read the text too. Shambhu says: k bindu: this black hole is the Ocean on whose edge we stand at the end of our sadhana .. it takes a long long time to figure out how to jump in such that the I is united with the Absolute. This edge may as well be a line or wall that is higher than infnity -- or a single point smaller than a quark, it matters not, it is still I. Shambhu says: Then..time itself can only be cognised while jiva...or as a brief flash from point of view of the absolute bindu: yes, thus the 3rd image such that the very thought that "I" am thinking is an error. Shambhu says: a hairs breadth apart... bindu: Yes or much much less, Shambhu says: m bindu: what is hard to grasp is the nature of Time. Time whether infnite or infinitesimal ... would appear to the Infnite as if it were nothing. Shambhu says: cannot be grasped by anything still in time.. bindu: yes, that is the key to it. We tend to think that WE can merge with The Absolute, but this would occur in Time such that we cannot merge with The Absolute, we must be the one who WATCHES from beyond Time as it occurs and remain there always thereafter. Shambhu says: and out of time..only the absolute is bindu: yes ONE AND ONLY ONE Absolute What we do not understand is the fact that what is conscious in us IS the Absolute Itself it is not a man or being, nor a jiva, nor a purusha, nor a soul, Shambhu says: neti neti bindu: It is an Infinite incredible Conscios ONE who is aware of being conscious in itself it knows itself but has no definition.. The cosmos could be called its MIND, but like any mind, nothing in it is real.... its is merely potentially real. Thus it is the potential-to-be of The Absolute The Cosmos is nothing but i-amNESS. Back to the old Wetness is NOT water again. we cannot say the Absolute is ConsciousNESS at all, because Consciousness is existence while The Absolute is transcendent of it. we can only say it exists prior to consciousNESS as sri-nissagadatta has shown. The word MIND used generically throughout all the books is inadaquate to convey what is meant by Chit in Sanskrit, mind is that black hole, which still smacks of "I" MIND whether the Cosmos or uncountable Buddha realms is still Mind - Yes, it is the VERY SELF OF I but it is not The Absolute. Shambhu says: This is where ramakrishna wanted to remain? bindu: Yes, but he missed it, because he siad "Oh Kali please do not take me completely into you because i will disappear then who will worship you? bindu: But this is due to him thinking he would die if he was totally united with the whole Shambhu says: kali is already self-worshipping; he would in a way be...that which feared its' own demise would have to dissolve/die bindu: Yes, as it says on the other page "the existence of God is neccessary for the Cosmos to exist" ie. parapurusha. see the link called The Appearance of God at this URL>>> http://www.upnaway.com/~bindu/yogicfire/ Shambhu says: oh oh oh parasumgate bindu: Yes, so then, beyond god is HIS or her unknowable absolute That Alone knows ITSELF.. no man, no god, no being can say the words that will describe it because CONCEPT hides it... this is mtrka... as spoken of in the Triadic Heart of Siva. Shambhu says: Tell me more of mtrka...the word.. bindu: Seed .. Number. bindu........ concept......... letter ...... an infinitesimal partical of anything . a sylable....... CONCEPT itself (all the above are concepts) have in them the potential to cause the cosmos because the cosmos must exist for them to come into being; thus Mantra is the source of being; but the unknown thing is this: The Counting is of the same thing over and over again - each a reflection (which is distorted by the rest of the Cosmos, because a given thing is seen in the context of all else) of the last; such that there appears unccountable numbers of existent things and beings of impossible diversity all built up from the first bindu of consciousness - from the first spark as it were . or the first photon of light. Think of it! that 1st photon requires the whole Cosmos in which to occur such that it IS the cosmos this is the secret of the Siva Lingam, it signifies that all things came forth from him.In reality though it is genderless. Shambhu says: And returning to that same spark bindu:Yes, as in the image flashing on the page at http://www.upnaway.com/~bindu/animbindu/animbindu.htm Shambhu says: and the cradle of the lingam? bindu: Note that at the final moment there is the space left then it collapses also, this is the cradle or void THE "I MIND" - impersonal but still I - it exists as a concept ---- or more properly AS Concept Itself - i.e. mtrka Shambhu says: om bindu: yes OM Shambhu says: ah, hum! bindu: It is the Om which gives tension or moment or creates potential or is the shakti.... this resides in the emptiness as mere potency. This causes the vibration which becomes the Cosmos as it is called in the Spanda Karika. Shambhu says: until it reaches bindu and then disappears.shouldnt it be m-om? bindu:Yes, We know that LIGHT is a wave it is vibrating - SO the Om is Light which accounts for all of relativity. We know that at its heart the atom arises from light sometimes it is there sometimes it isn't it is flashing in and out of existence the thing that is not understood though is this: THE WHOLE THING IS DOING IT| The entire cosmos appears in less than a heartbeat - and dissappears again it is a pulsating thrumming light - it is Spanda-Shakti - it is MOM! Om Shambhu says: Mind links all these flashing s together to form a concept of time? bindu: Yes, that is it precisely. YES, this hides the truth. Shambhu says: mind? bindu: MIND, is TIME - ALL TIME - all Times! Why ? because nothing can apppear that is not Mind, mind is the wrong word though MIND is the HOLE in reality -- IT is Time The Conscious ONE is NOT mind - there is no mind. NONE. Time cannot and does not exist in eternal infinity.. because infinity cannot be counted due to the fact that all we will achieve is counting the same SINGLE infinite over and over again... For the same reason Concept cannot describe the Absolute... Mtrka can point at it, but not describe it. Mtrka in English would translate to Potential-to-Be (the Be clause, being Concept) NOT "A" Concept but "CONCEPT ITSELF" - as said earlier, Concept requires the Cosmos. bindu is the final truth, but bindu is a mere point of origin only... it is like a door it is the first concept Cosmos is ConsciousNess. IT is NOT Conscious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.