Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Ahisma & Mark Twain?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

This is really fantastic writing.

At the core is the principle of Ahisma

while the style & spirit reminds of Mark Twain.

--------------

 

The Helicopter Gunships of Freedom

 

Help me puzzle out Iraq. I'm just a country boy, and don't

understand Advanced Thought, or high strategy, or anything else. I

admit it. Tell me about Iraq – quick, 'cause it seems to be blowing

itself all to flinders, and it's hard to study something the which

there ain't no more.

 

Now, as I understand it from the White House itself, it's all

because of three diehard Saddamites, two terrorists, and an outside

agitator. Yes. The White House says ninety-nine and forty-four one-

hundredths percent of Iraqis love us, and want us to bomb them and

invade them, and starve them with embargos, and only a few soreheads

don't like it. And I believe the White House. You can only lie so

long before you slip up and tell the truth. I figure they're about

due.

 

What I think is, those rascally diehards and the outside agitator

must be fast. I mean, they get from city to city so quick they make

it seem like the whole country wants us to go somewhere else,

anywhere else, when really they all love us. If I worked for them

Nike shoe people, I believe I'd get those terrorists to sign an

advertising contract. Michael Jordan was swift, but compared to

these guys he's a federal program.

 

But I want to understand about strategy. Yesterday, it said on CNN,

the White House bombed a mosque full of people and killed forty of

them, to make them democratic. It was because the two terrorists or

maybe the outside agitator was inside. Being as I am unwashed and

don't know much, I'd have said it wasn't the shiniest thought in the

idea basket. You got a country full of people who take religion real

serious, and so you bomb a church in the middle of services.

 

But what do I know? Somebody called Mark Kimmitt, a brigadier

general, said to CNN, "When you start using a religious location for

military purposes, it loses its protected status." If they hid in

mosques again, we'd bomb them again, he said.

 

Now that he has explained it, it makes sense to me. If bombing one

church doesn't make them democratic, and love us, then bombing some

more churches will. It wouldn't fly in West Virginia, but that's a

different culture. Arabs like being bombed.

 

Some folks would say Kimmitt has to be dumber than a bucket of

catfish. I'm less sanguine. I've known catfish. Kimmitt makes a

catfish look like Fifth Century Athens. If I were part of the Iraqi

Resistance, I couldn't think of anything I'd like more than some

damn fool blowing up mosques. It would save fortunes on recruiting

expenses.

 

When I lived in Alabama, which never invaded Arab countries – we

figured it was none of our business – people used to say as how the

two greatest Confederate generals were George McClellan and Ambrose

Burnside. I reckon the two most effective outside agitators must be

Kimmitt and Paul Bremer.

 

Granted, I don't know much about the White House. I never get calls

from Mr. Bush, or his ventriloquists. Still, I figure he must know a

lot about the Middle East. I guess he must speak several languages

as well as a little English. General Sanchez in Baghdad and all the

American officials speak good Arabic of course. They must. Bush

especially must speak Arabic. Why, it's practically a second

language in Texas. It wouldn't make sense to send people to Iraq who

couldn't talk a lick of the local lingo and barely knew where they

were. Don't you think?

 

One thing the White House has done real well is housetrain the

press. Even I can see that. Reporters today are well behaved

suckups, like those fuzzy little lapdogs you could glue to a stick

and use for a duster. Notice how we never hear anything about old

Saddam? (Note that I'm on first-name terms with him.) I guess it's

not our business, and the papers aren't going to ask. Ever hear

honest interviews with the troops in Iraq? Naw. That's not our

business either. I mean, they're not our sons, brothers, husbands

and neighbors or anything.

 

But you can bet that ninety-nine and forty-four one-hundredths

percent of our soldiers love what they're doing, and care deeply

about democracy in Iraq, wherever it is.

 

I see hope, howsomever. I have read that we are getting advice from

Israel on pacifying Moslems. You know: When we think one of the

three diehards, two terrorists, or the outside agitator might own a

house, we bulldoze it and punish the entire town. (It's starting to

look as if diehards own most of the houses in Iraq. I guess we're

fighting a war against real-estate magnates. Maybe if we raised

mortgage rates….)

 

Skeptics and other traitors say that the Israelis are the most

provably clueless people alive when it comes to pacifying Moslems.

They've been at it for fifty years and some guy still blows up in a

shopping mall every twenty seconds. This isn't fair. Americans are

impatient people. Things take time. Given that there are more Iraqis

than Palestinians, I figure we'll get the job done in about three

hundred years. If we send more troops.

 

Now, some people tell me that I'm all soft and squishy on terrorism

and need to learn about realpolitik. They may be right. As best I

can see, realpolitik is a mood of self-congratulatory pugnacity

accompanied by complete witlessness about how people work. It is

usually associated with paranoia and the empathy of a table-leg. And

it isn't spelled well.

 

Anyhow, realpoliticky friends tell me that what we need to do is

teach these people a sharp lesson. If somebody shoots at us from the

town of Falafel, we should destroy the city. That'll show'em,

bowwow, grr, woof. There is a certain logic to this. Dead people are

inherently peaceful. In classical antiquity armies put cities to the

sword, adults, children, dogs, and gold fish. It sure enough

pacified them.

 

Maybe that's what we're doing. As I write this, CNN says Mr. Bush is

attacking Falafel, or maybe it was Wahabi, with an AC-130 Spectre

gunship. Spectre makes a pretty good sword. In another life as a

military columnist I flew in those things, then the H model though

they're probably U's now. If memory serves, they now have a 105

howitzer, 40mm Bofors, and 25mm Gatling stuck out one side. Spray a

city with those, and they'll love freedom, I say. And us, too. I

always love people that blow up my neighborhood. Don't you?

 

What I think is, the Iraqis need to learn that democracy isn't easy,

and doesn't come cheap.

 

http://www.lewrockwell.com/reed/reed31.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...