Guest guest Posted July 8, 2004 Report Share Posted July 8, 2004 , "MICHAEL BINDEL" <michael_bindel@h...> wrote: > dear michael, friends, since tony posts his "purports" on nds too, this exchange is taken from there: ____________________ > It is a word that I coined on the Harsha site many years ago and I > think Greg or someone reduced to the form it is now. Or I did---I > can't remember. > It means a verbal non dualist. That is people who are not realised > but talk all the time in a non dual way, and usually pick up other > people for not speaking in a non dual way. > Another word for thim is 'boring pain in the arses'........ONS..Tony. ) thank you tony... according to the old nondualistic principle: "when pointing accusing finger three others point at you" we just received a perfect definition of an illusory entity named "tony" (whoever needed it after reading its "purports" lol) yosy ps. i take the "oink", sorry "ons" at the ends of your posts refer to "om nama shivaya"; what does that mean in your opinion? ____________________ poor tony... working so hard to explain to the ordinary, unenlightened people the truth, and all he gets is such an ingratitude... you see, tony, that's what happens when you cast pearls before swine - this poor jewish boy did warn you! yosy (a swine) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2004 Report Share Posted July 8, 2004 , "yosyx" <yosyflug@0...> wrote: > , "MICHAEL BINDEL" > <michael_bindel@h...> wrote: > > > dear michael, friends, since tony posts his "purports" on nds too, > this exchange is taken from there: > ____________________ > > It is a word that I coined on the Harsha site many years ago and I > > think Greg or someone reduced to the form it is now. Or I did---I > > can't remember. > > It means a verbal non dualist. That is people who are not realised > > but talk all the time in a non dual way, and usually pick up other > > people for not speaking in a non dual way. > > Another word for thim is 'boring pain in the > arses'........ONS..Tony. > > ) thank you tony... according to the old nondualistic > principle: "when pointing accusing finger three others point at you" > we just received a perfect definition of an illusory entity > named "tony" (whoever needed it after reading its "purports" lol) > > yosy > > ps. i take the "oink", sorry "ons" at the ends of your posts refer > to "om nama shivaya"; what does that mean in your opinion? > ____________________ > > poor tony... working so hard to explain to the ordinary, > unenlightened people the truth, and all he gets is such an > ingratitude... you see, tony, that's what happens when you cast > pearls before swine - this poor jewish boy did warn you! > > yosy (a swine) Namaste, Problem is as we are one mind, I am reading yours, at this moment, and your exchanges with me on the purports are less than honest in motive, and have a more emotive base. Mine however, no matter how inadequate they seem to you are just my honest opinion. As of now I will not respond to anymore 'stirrings' by you on this subject...............ONS..Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2004 Report Share Posted July 8, 2004 , "Tony OClery" <aoclery> wrote: > , "yosyx" <yosyflug@0...> wrote: > > , "MICHAEL BINDEL" > > <michael_bindel@h...> wrote: > > > > > dear michael, friends, since tony posts his "purports" on nds too, > > this exchange is taken from there: > > ____________________ > > > It is a word that I coined on the Harsha site many years ago and > I > > > think Greg or someone reduced to the form it is now. Or I did--- I > > > can't remember. > > > It means a verbal non dualist. That is people who are not > realised > > > but talk all the time in a non dual way, and usually pick up > other > > > people for not speaking in a non dual way. > > > Another word for thim is 'boring pain in the > > arses'........ONS..Tony. > > > > ) thank you tony... according to the old nondualistic > > principle: "when pointing accusing finger three others point at > you" > > we just received a perfect definition of an illusory entity > > named "tony" (whoever needed it after reading its "purports" lol) > > > > yosy > > > > ps. i take the "oink", sorry "ons" at the ends of your posts refer > > to "om nama shivaya"; what does that mean in your opinion? > > ____________________ > > > > poor tony... working so hard to explain to the ordinary, > > unenlightened people the truth, and all he gets is such an > > ingratitude... you see, tony, that's what happens when you cast > > pearls before swine - this poor jewish boy did warn you! > > > > yosy (a swine) > > Namaste, > > Problem is as we are one mind, I am reading yours, at this moment, > and your exchanges with me on the purports are less than honest in > motive, and have a more emotive base. ??? > Mine however, no matter how > inadequate they seem to you are just my honest opinion. !!! > As of now I > will not respond to anymore 'stirrings' by you on this > subject...............ONS..Tony. lol "suffering is in the i of the beholder" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.