Guest guest Posted August 7, 2004 Report Share Posted August 7, 2004 In a message dated 8/7/2004 9:36:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time, aoclery writes: Jesus was an Essene, no doubt and Kabbalist; that I don't deny. True Kabbalist not madonna britney spears variety. Books have already been written on the early Christians/Essenes and Kabbalah. It is difficult to get real information for both the New Testament and the Old Testament particularly are unreliable. They are at best good teaching myths, but unreliabe as per history. Here is an extract from something that I published; "There is no evidence for the existence of Solomon or David except in the Bible. (Chaim Romanescu of Tel Aviv University) The Temple Mount could not have been built by Solomon because it was built 400 years prior to the claimed time of his existence 1,000 B.C. The description in the Bible fits the Palace/Temple of Amenhotep III at Thebes in Egypt! Right down to the mosaics on the floor, described by the Queen of Sheba/Saba. The Temple Mount was probably built by Egyptian Tothmosis III, in or about 1468 B.C. The word David in Hebrew is written DWD which means Toth in Egyptian. He was the conqueror of Palestine and David is probably loosely based on this character. Moses/Mosis was possibly Akenaten the Pharoah, ( this was a theory held by Sigmund Freud), who was thrown out of Egypt for his monotheism. The word Mosis means 'rightful heir', in Egyptian. Moses is also probably, as well, a composite figure from different times and exoduses. Hebrew settlements existed in Europe, Ethiopia, India, Arabia and the settlement in Palestine/Falastinia/Philistinia never was as large as to occupy the whole country. Most Hebrew history was written in Babylon, for there was no Hebrew literature until c500 B.C. It was mostly purloined from Egyptian, and other Semitic, stories to give the Jews a feeling of identity and continuity. Which in itself is not a bad motive, considering the times. The Songs of Solomon are a mixture and many reflect a female view. Also some Essenes never were prisoners in Babylon and preserved a direct line of Mosaic Law, somewhat on the fringes of the new religion. Moses is a construct, no doubt of several writers, and the OT was rewritten on the return from Babylon and again in the Hasmonean period 150 BCE? according to the great Jewish mystic Baruch Spinoza. However notwithstanding all this it is as is the NT an excellent teaching myth as Campbell would say........ONS..Tony. Tony! Amazing! We are in total accord with this! I too have studied these old histories, and have commented to many of my inner circle upon these Egyptian/Jweish coincidences and the fact that the 23rd Psalm is in fact the recitation of the Pharoh upon taking power, as he walks thru the Valley of the Kings ("Valley of the Shadow of Death"). In fact, the claim that Jews were held as slaves in Egypt is not historically very accurate, either, as the family names, etc. are all entertwined. When Moses (from Tutmoses, of course) leaves Egypt with the Hebrews, they leave with oxcarts, gold and jewels, and all of the animals they own. Damn. Some fine slave life. When have slaves ever owned gold and jewels? And the further proof is that they melt down this gold jewelry in order to make a Gold Baal Cow icon. Well, finally, we are joined in spiritual harmony. And so many doubted that it could happen. LOL Now watch, we will both be criticized by everyone else as being "anti-Semetic" which I think is very funny. If one suggests that the Egyptians and the Hebrews were both an intermixed people, how is that anti-Semetic? Both cultures are Semetic. Namaste, Zenbob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2004 Report Share Posted August 7, 2004 Zenbob, Excellent! Now, we are on the samelength! A person's job does not describe Him/her !! it is the 'inner' soul of that person that is relEvant! Madonna has the same 'divine' essence that resides me, you or Tony. and what she does for a Living is immaterial !!! however , materialistic that may be!! love and regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2004 Report Share Posted August 7, 2004 @ materialism of this commercial world. So, in the end, it's a good thing. But your > disdain and disrespect are not worthy from a Christian commentators > perspective...recall, Mary Magdalene was the Madonna of her time, and Madonna was the > mother of Jesus in those days. Someone will likely write a book on the > modern versus historical relationship of all of these people and names, now that > they are all linked by Kabbalah. > > Namaste > > Zenbob Namaste, First of all I am not a Christian commentator, I have no religion, and my background is Irish. However my grandmother was an Irish Jew, which in all ridiculousness qualifies me for citizenship in Israel, isn't that ridiculous?...............hahaahah I did love her though and met many Jewish people, even at the synogogue when very young. She wasn't much into religion in an organised way though. I knew this would bring somebody out. The kabbalah is fine with me, I was into that before Vedanta, but not this popularised, road show, commercialised version, which even Jewish leaders have commented on. As I said it is better than nothing, but it is akin to selling Jnana, Indulgences and Tantra.........It is ersatz and commercialised. Jesus was an Essene, no doubt and Kabbalist; that I don't deny. True Kabbalist not madonna britney spears variety. Books have already been written on the early Christians/Essenes and Kabbalah. It is difficult to get real information for both the New Testament and the Old Testament particularly are unreliable. They are at best good teaching myths, but unreliabe as per history. Here is an extract from something that I published; "There is no evidence for the existence of Solomon or David except in the Bible. (Chaim Romanescu of Tel Aviv University) The Temple Mount could not have been built by Solomon because it was built 400 years prior to the claimed time of his existence 1,000 B.C. The description in the Bible fits the Palace/Temple of Amenhotep III at Thebes in Egypt! Right down to the mosaics on the floor, described by the Queen of Sheba/Saba. The Temple Mount was probably built by Egyptian Tothmosis III, in or about 1468 B.C. The word David in Hebrew is written DWD which means Toth in Egyptian. He was the conqueror of Palestine and David is probably loosely based on this character. Moses/Mosis was possibly Akenaten the Pharoah, ( this was a theory held by Sigmund Freud), who was thrown out of Egypt for his monotheism. The word Mosis means 'rightful heir', in Egyptian. Moses is also probably, as well, a composite figure from different times and exoduses. Hebrew settlements existed in Europe, Ethiopia, India, Arabia and the settlement in Palestine/Falastinia/Philistinia never was as large as to occupy the whole country. Most Hebrew history was written in Babylon, for there was no Hebrew literature until c500 B.C. It was mostly purloined from Egyptian, and other Semitic, stories to give the Jews a feeling of identity and continuity. Which in itself is not a bad motive, considering the times. The Songs of Solomon are a mixture and many reflect a female view. Also some Essenes never were prisoners in Babylon and preserved a direct line of Mosaic Law, somewhat on the fringes of the new religion. Moses is a construct, no doubt of several writers, and the OT was rewritten on the return from Babylon and again in the Hasmonean period 150 BCE? according to the great Jewish mystic Baruch Spinoza. However notwithstanding all this it is as is the NT an excellent teaching myth as Campbell would say........ONS..Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2004 Report Share Posted August 8, 2004 (AT) (DOT) > > > Tony! Amazing! We are in total accord with this! I too have studied these > old histories, and have commented to many of my inner circle upon these > Egyptian/Jweish coincidences and the fact that the 23rd Psalm is in fact the > recitation of the Pharoh upon taking power, as he walks thru the Valley of the > Kings ("Valley of the Shadow of Death"). > > In fact, the claim that Jews were held as slaves in Egypt is not > historically very accurate, either, as the family names, etc. are all entertwined. When > Moses (from Tutmoses, of course) leaves Egypt with the Hebrews, they leave > with oxcarts, gold and jewels, and all of the animals they own. > > Damn. Some fine slave life. When have slaves ever owned gold and jewels? > And the further proof is that they melt down this gold jewelry in order to > make a Gold Baal Cow icon. > > Well, finally, we are joined in spiritual harmony. And so many doubted that > it could happen. > > LOL > > Now watch, we will both be criticized by everyone else as being > "anti-Semetic" which I think is very funny. If one suggests that the Egyptians and the > Hebrews were both an intermixed people, how is that anti- Semetic? Both > cultures are Semetic. > > Namaste, > > Zenbob Namaste Z, You will be called anti semitic by some zionists for they base their claim to Israel, and treatment of the Palestinians, on these obviously non historical texts. I'm quite used to being called anti-semitic, but I'm in good company with many outstanding Jewish writers.Chomsky, Finkelstein, Mate etc etc.........ONS...Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2004 Report Share Posted August 8, 2004 > > LOL > > > > Now watch, we will both be criticized by everyone else as being > > "anti-Semetic" which I think is very funny. If one suggests that > the Egyptians and the > > Hebrews were both an intermixed people, how is that anti- > Semetic? Both > > cultures are Semetic. > > > > Namaste, > > > > Zenbob > > Namaste Z, > You will be called anti semitic by some zionists for they base their > claim to Israel, and treatment of the Palestinians, on these > obviously non historical texts. > > I'm quite used to being called anti-semitic, but I'm in good company > with many outstanding Jewish writers.Chomsky, Finkelstein, Mate etc > etc.........ONS...Tony Namaste Z, http://www.geocities.com/aoclery/politicoconspiracy/Zionismdoesntdefi nejewish.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2004 Report Share Posted August 8, 2004 , zen2wrk@a... wrote: > > In a message dated 8/7/2004 9:36:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > aoclery writes: > > Jesus was an Essene, no doubt and Kabbalist; that I don't deny. True > Kabbalist not madonna britney spears variety. Books have already > been written on the early Christians/Essenes and Kabbalah. > It is difficult to get real information for both the New Testament > and the Old Testament particularly are unreliable. They are at best > good teaching myths, but unreliabe as per history. > > Here is an extract from something that I published; > "There is no evidence for the existence of Solomon or David except > in the Bible. > (Chaim Romanescu of Tel Aviv University) The Temple Mount could not > have been built by Solomon because it was built 400 years prior to > the claimed time of his existence 1,000 B.C. The description in the > Bible fits the Palace/Temple of Amenhotep III at Thebes in Egypt! > Right down to the mosaics on the floor, described by the Queen of > Sheba/Saba. The Temple Mount was probably built by Egyptian > Tothmosis III, in or about 1468 B.C. The word David in Hebrew is > written DWD which means Toth in Egyptian. He was the conqueror of > Palestine and David is probably loosely based on this character. > Moses/Mosis was possibly Akenaten the Pharoah, ( this was a theory > held by Sigmund Freud), who was thrown out of Egypt for his > monotheism. The word Mosis means 'rightful heir', in Egyptian. Moses > is also probably, as well, a composite figure from different times > and exoduses. Hebrew settlements existed in Europe, Ethiopia, India, > Arabia and the settlement in Palestine/Falastinia/Philistinia never > was as large as to occupy the whole country. > Most Hebrew history was written in Babylon, for there was no Hebrew > literature until c500 B.C. It was mostly purloined from Egyptian, > and other Semitic, stories to give the Jews a feeling of identity > and continuity. Which in itself is not a bad motive, considering the > times. The Songs of Solomon are a mixture and many reflect a female > view. Also some Essenes never were prisoners in Babylon and > preserved a direct line of Mosaic Law, somewhat on the fringes of > the new religion. Moses is a construct, no doubt of several writers, > and the OT was rewritten on the return from Babylon and again in the > Hasmonean period 150 BCE? according to the great Jewish mystic > Baruch Spinoza. However notwithstanding all this it is as is the NT > an excellent teaching myth as Campbell would say........ONS..Tony. Tony! Amazing! We are in total accord with this! I too have studied these > old histories, and have commented to many of my inner circle upon these > Egyptian/Jweish coincidences and the fact that the 23rd Psalm is in fact the > recitation of the Pharoh upon taking power, as he walks thru the Valley of the > Kings ("Valley of the Shadow of Death"). > > In fact, the claim that Jews were held as slaves in Egypt is not > historically very accurate, either, as the family names, etc. are all entertwined. When > Moses (from Tutmoses, of course) leaves Egypt with the Hebrews, they leave > with oxcarts, gold and jewels, and all of the animals they own. > > Damn. Some fine slave life. When have slaves ever owned gold and jewels? > And the further proof is that they melt down this gold jewelry in order to > make a Gold Baal Cow icon. > > Well, finally, we are joined in spiritual harmony. lol as in "an enemy of my enemy is my friend?" lol > And so many doubted that > it could happen. > > LOL > everything is always in harmony... even the apparent disonance is part of it. > Now watch, we will both be criticized by everyone else as being > "anti-Semetic" which I think is very funny. If one suggests that the Egyptians and the > Hebrews were both an intermixed people, how is that anti-Semetic? Both > cultures are Semetic. > > Namaste, > > Zenbob > > lol just to tell you, generally i am in agreement with it too. so? frankly, this does not concern me - it is like seeking the differnt characteristics of the snake, when there always was - and is - a rope... there is only one real nation - humanity. either you are "a mentsh" or you are not. atlantis myth included... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.