Energy surges-Kundalini-Prana.

[Guest guest]

, "Harsha" wrote:

> Dear Tony,

>

> Much of what you have to say is worth considering as it is based

on your

> experience, at least in some part, but it comes across as

judgmental.

>

> How Kundalini Shakti operates in people differs considerably on a

wide range

> of factors.

 

Namaste Harsha,

 

I realise that what I am saying is heresy to many people, who are

attached to their 'surges'. That sounds funny actually hahahah.

However my last paragraph reproduced below shows that my

judgementalism only goes as far as the resulting spiritualiy.

> > The yardstick to me though is that a person become more the

> > spiritual, less attached to the world and its sensual activities

and

> > pleasures. That is the difference between the pranas and

kundalini-

> > prana.<<

 

I am aware it is all one, but the pranas are broken up so to speak

to play roles, udana, apana etc, and of course Kundalini-Prana. My

observation about many people, particularly Westerners, claiming K-

Activity is not very enlightening. Many are attached to Sex, the

surges or whatever, and I see little to claim a modicum of

Spirituality. Many are charlatans, and many others are deluded or

suffering from some mental breakdowns.

 

In the end result the K-Prana activity is to result in a more

cleansed Vijnanamaykosa and subsequent rise in 'awareness'. I am

sure my opinon is very similar to many in India.

 

As Lakshmana Swamy says prana raised to the sahasrara may result in

some increase in siddhis but that is all. IMO it will not go down

the amrita nadi to the 'Heart', if the vijnanamayakosa isn't

cleansed of its vasanas and samskaras. So if it cannot do that, it

begs the question doesn't it?

 

Much of the K-activity in the end may just be people observing and

experiencing the pranamayakosa, Vivekananda remarks on

this.......ONS..Tony.