Guest guest Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 , Antoine Carré <antoine.carre@s...> wrote: > - > Tony OClery > > << Much of the K-activity in the end may just be people observing and > experiencing the pranamayakosa, Vivekananda remarks on > this.......ONS..Tony. >> > > May just be ..., you said Tony. What if it was not just people observing and experiencing the pranamayakosa? > Who are you to judge? > > Antoine Namaste, This is just opinion and I am not saying it applies to everyone. The main opinion I am offering is that most so called K-Activity may not be that at all. I suppose it depends whether one follows Patanjali Yoga or Tantra or Ramana. It is a view; one it tantric and one is advaitic. As with everything the 'proof of the pudding is in the eating'. If people are becoming more spiritual, non violenct and focused, then I would be inclined to believe it is K. However if they still eat meat, are not into ahimsa, or a sexual indulgers etc with regard to tantra, etc--------I would tend to believe it is not K-Prana but one of the other five roles of Prana, or even physical nerves or psychosis..........So there is no judging except for judging the pudding..............ONS...Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.