Energy surges-Kundalini-Prana. / Tony

[Guest guest]

, Antoine Carré

<antoine.carre@s...> wrote:

> Tony,

>

> You said,

>

> << However whilst in it (illusion) we have to deal with the

situation as it appears.

> The real meaning of a successful aroused K-Prana is the merging

back into the K, and then beyond to Nirguna.........ONS..Tony.>>

>

> In other words, _if_ I am to understand your words correctly

_then_ there is no way I can say that someone else as merged back or

not.

>

> Which brings me back to my first question:

>

> You said then:

> << Much of the K-activity in the end may just be people observing

and

> experiencing the pranamayakosa, Vivekananda remarks on

this.......ONS..Tony. >>

>

> I asked then:

> << May just be ..., you said Tony. What if it was _not_ just

people observing and experiencing the pranamayakosa?

> Who are you to judge? >>

>

> Namaste,

>

> Antoine

 

Namaste A,

 

We have to decide if we are talking about the relative or the

absolute otherwise we mix our apples and oranges.

 

As I said earlier I am not judging just offering a observation or

opinion. The only judgment can be a persons obvious behavior or

development thats all.

 

Ultimately it is all delusion and never happened, but it is real or

has validity whilst one is in it.

 

We cannot tell who has merged but it is an easier guess on who

hasn't.

 

I will state again, that I believe in K-Prana from my own experience

but there are other pranas that can be confused with it. I know

that's heresy, for people love to extoll their experiences with K

and Tantra. However I'm not a Tantrika but an aspiring Advaitin, so

Ramana and Patanjali are more appropriate to me. K-Prana will take

care of itself without me worrying about it.

 

Nobody anywhere has given me a satisfactory hypothesis on it though,

not even some of the texts.

....You appear to be a Tantrik why don't you educate

me?????????/......ONS..Tony