Guest guest Posted October 9, 2004 Report Share Posted October 9, 2004 , "Al Larus" <erilarend> wrote: > >> > I do not disagree and understand your words Tony. > And I will not split hairs asking if only the ajnani can see what is > created. > A large number of analogies are written, some very good but none exact. > > To me it is obvious that the emphasis on the difference between Nirguna and > Saguna > is used to 'remove ignorance' ( I am sure better words can be used ). > Then (after this) the statement is obsolete. > > I look at these words, they are one and the same to me. > And I do not intend to make a silly shortcut saying there is no ignorance. > Still repeated use of 'sea not waves' could in many circumstances > be understood as continuation of difference by the reader. > hi friends, been absent from the net for some two weeks so did not read the posts yet. but with your permition, alan amigo, a remark on tony's post (which i do not read usually anyway lol): > Tony OClery > > >Namaste, I won't take a risk on my own opinion here is Ramana's. > a) whoever isn't ready to risk all, however self infatuated s/he may be - did not embark, in truth, on the first step of the spiritual quest. b) ramana, the beloved, did not express opinions. knowledge is not opinion. neither is clever intelectualization and self-convinction, backed by wise quotes and authoritative sources. <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.