Guest guest Posted June 5, 2005 Report Share Posted June 5, 2005 , "Emanuele De Benedetti" <e.debenedetti@t...> wrote: > Agreed, my dear consciousness/love > > Marifa > - > yosyflug > > Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:38 PM > Re: Why Arunachala? > > > there is no 'jnani'. though apparently possessing name and form, this is only in the eyes of the beholder. the jnani ceased to exist as an individual; it is the ever-present, all pervading truth/self coming through this particular name and form. though apparently an individual, there is no persona there - only the unlimited consciousness/love shining unobstructed. > > yosy>> I take it, dear yosy, that while I pretentiously intellectualize, what you say above comes from your non-intellectual, non-conceptual direct unmediated experience of "jnana" or "prajna" (just to give "it" a "name" so that we can attempt to communicate) which rendered your former "illusory" self non-existent, OR RATHER, which "enabledyou" to "see" that what you may have thought of as your "former" self, never had existence at all. Am I correct in THIS assessment, as I was INCORRECT in my last one? I realize that I very well might NOT be "deserving" of an HONEST answer, but just on the chance that PERHAPS an answer may be forthcoming from the non-entity formerly referred to as "yosy", I proffer my question Gary Jai chai! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.