Guest guest Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 Sri Ramana was familiar with Sri Aurbindo's teachings and thought that these were things well known and stated by many ancient works but had been put in a new packaging using new terms by Aurbindo. He read some of Aurbindo's works in one night when a devotee brought him a book. Sometimes people from Aurbindo's Ashram would come to Ramana Ashram and vice versa as well. The difference between Sri Ramana and Aurbindo is very simple and fundamental. Sri Ramana taught stillness and to abide in the Self, the Heart that is the source of all activities. Aurbindo is all about activity and, in fact, focuses on mental and supramental activity. Ascent and descent of divine forces, etc. The Heart Sri Ramana spoke about is not the heart-center of kundalini yoga but the two are often mixed up. These two are not the same and Sri Ramana pointed that out many times. The Heart that Sri Ramana refers to is beyond time and space and all activities and is the Self Aware Presence abiding as It Self. From the perspective of the mind, the Heart, the Self has a location. The ancients called it the cave of the Heart. Upon entering it, everything disappears including the location and Self is known in its fullness in its own nature by it Self as the Eternal Self Knowing, Self Bliss, Self Existence, that has always been. So the question of ascent and descent of forces is moot in Self-Realization. In Bhagavan Harsha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2005 Report Share Posted November 20, 2005 Harsha, This is quite correct, if one has entered the Cave of the Heart. However until that occurs there may well be much movement of "forces ascending and descending" and the initiate who is experiencing them may well need guidance and grounding. If such experiences occur spontaneously there may be much concern about what is occurring because the person doesn't understand what is happening. In the NonDual perspective the response to such phenomena is to observe, and ask "To whom is this occurring? Who am I?" Yes? JL , Harsha wrote: > > Sri Ramana was familiar with Sri Aurbindo's teachings and thought that > these were things well known and stated by many ancient works but had > been put in a new packaging using new terms by Aurbindo. He read some of > Aurbindo's works in one night when a devotee brought him a book. > Sometimes people from Aurbindo's Ashram would come to Ramana Ashram and > vice versa as well. The difference between Sri Ramana and Aurbindo is > very simple and fundamental. Sri Ramana taught stillness and to abide in > the Self, the Heart that is the source of all activities. Aurbindo is > all about activity and, in fact, focuses on mental and supramental > activity. Ascent and descent of divine forces, etc. > > The Heart Sri Ramana spoke about is not the heart-center of kundalini > yoga but the two are often mixed up. These two are not the same and Sri > Ramana pointed that out many times. The Heart that Sri Ramana refers to > is beyond time and space and all activities and is the Self Aware > Presence abiding as It Self. From the perspective of the mind, the > Heart, the Self has a location. The ancients called it the cave of the > Heart. Upon entering it, everything disappears including the location > and Self is known in its fullness in its own nature by it Self as the > Eternal Self Knowing, Self Bliss, Self Existence, that has always been. > So the question of ascent and descent of forces is moot in Self-Realization. > > In Bhagavan > Harsha > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2005 Report Share Posted November 20, 2005 , Harsha wrote: > > Sri Ramana was familiar with Sri Aurbindo's teachings and thought that > these were things well known and stated by many ancient works but had > been put in a new packaging using new terms by Aurbindo. He read some of > Aurbindo's works in one night when a devotee brought him a book. > Sometimes people from Aurbindo's Ashram would come to Ramana Ashram and > vice versa as well. The difference between Sri Ramana and Aurbindo is > very simple and fundamental. Sri Ramana taught stillness and to abide in > the Self, the Heart that is the source of all activities. Aurbindo is > all about activity and, in fact, focuses on mental and supramental > activity. Ascent and descent of divine forces, etc. > Namaste,Harsha et al, Yes I have some work of Sri Aurobindo. He was an interesting person, a worker for Swaraj in India initially, and then seemingly taught a philosophy seemingly similar to Nietche and the 'Superman'. So it seem Aurobindo was all about transformation of matter as opposed to its denial. No doubt this type of Yoga would be of interest to those who are not interested in religion, advaita or ajatavada. It does stimulate the intellect, but Harsha you are right about Ramana and the simplicity of 'Who am I?'.........ONS..Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.