Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

It doesn't matter what we eat????????

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Namaste,

 

Some say it doesn't matter what we eat. However does the cruelty of

the slaughterhouse and the terror of the animal matter??..This is the

cognitive disfunction of many on the spiritual path. Their level of

awareness through purification of the vijnanamayakosa is not high

enough. This ability of the human mind to filter out this bad

information about death, slaughter and cruelty in favour of satisfying

an eogistic desire to suage one's palate and addiction is nothin short

of amazing.

 

I don't extend this to the non spiritual seekers as they don't pretend

or know to be any better...........ONS..Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste,

 

Yes Tony, now here's something to ponder about what about cruelty of

other human beings that are on a different spiritual path that you

may find distasteful..what kind of harm is done there when a person

gives verbal violence to another? Just something to think about..

Blessings

Randy

 

 

 

, "Tony OClery" <aoclery>

wrote:

>

> Namaste,

>

> Some say it doesn't matter what we eat. However does the cruelty of

> the slaughterhouse and the terror of the animal matter??..This is

the

> cognitive disfunction of many on the spiritual path. Their level of

> awareness through purification of the vijnanamayakosa is not high

> enough. This ability of the human mind to filter out this bad

> information about death, slaughter and cruelty in favour of

satisfying

> an eogistic desire to suage one's palate and addiction is nothin

short

> of amazing.

>

> I don't extend this to the non spiritual seekers as they don't

pretend

> or know to be any better...........ONS..Tony.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, "panamavolcan"

<panamavolcan> wrote:

>

> Namaste,

>

> Yes Tony, now here's something to ponder about what about cruelty of

> other human beings that are on a different spiritual path that you

> may find distasteful..what kind of harm is done there when a person

> gives verbal violence to another? Just something to think about..

> Blessings

> Randy

 

Namaste,

 

Verbal violence is hardly the slaughterhouse and mostly only offends

people's egos and false images of themselves.........Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony,

 

I agree to disagree words are very powerful and if you beleive in

karma will add up much karma to you..there are many kinds of

slaughterhouse's Tony...

Blessings

Randy

 

 

 

 

, "Tony OClery" <aoclery>

wrote:

>

> , "panamavolcan"

> <panamavolcan> wrote:

> >

> > Namaste,

> >

> > Yes Tony, now here's something to ponder about what about cruelty

of

> > other human beings that are on a different spiritual path that

you

> > may find distasteful..what kind of harm is done there when a

person

> > gives verbal violence to another? Just something to think about..

> > Blessings

> > Randy

>

> Namaste,

>

> Verbal violence is hardly the slaughterhouse and mostly only

offends

> people's egos and false images of themselves.........>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, "Tony OClery" <aoclery>

wrote:

>

> , "panamavolcan"

> <panamavolcan> wrote:

> >

> > Namaste,

> >

> > Yes Tony, now here's something to ponder about what about

cruelty of

> > other human beings that are on a different spiritual path that

you

> > may find distasteful..what kind of harm is done there when a

person

> > gives verbal violence to another? Just something to think about..

> > Blessings

> > Randy

>

> Namaste,

>

> Verbal violence is hardly the slaughterhouse and mostly only

offends

> people's egos and false images of themselves.........Tony

 

 

Tony, please don't dismiss verbal violence as offending

mostly only the ego. In a Domestic Violence situation,

verbal violence is considered mental and emotional abuse,

creating long-term problems in one's life. It literally

breaks the spirit.

 

I realize we aren't talking about a DV situation here,

but violence is violence. There is no good and bad

violence, which you appear to be stating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, "panamavolcan"

<panamavolcan> wrote:

>

>

> Tony,

>

> I agree to disagree words are very powerful and if you beleive in

> karma will add up much karma to you..there are many kinds of

> slaughterhouse's Tony...

> Blessings

> Randy

 

Cognitive dissonance/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, "Tg" <leteegee@g...> wrote:

>

> , "Tony OClery"

<aoclery>

> wrote:

> >

> > , "panamavolcan"

> > <panamavolcan> wrote:

> > >

> > > Namaste,

> > >

> > > Yes Tony, now here's something to ponder about what about

> cruelty of

> > > other human beings that are on a different spiritual path that

> you

> > > may find distasteful..what kind of harm is done there when a

> person

> > > gives verbal violence to another? Just something to think

about..

> > > Blessings

> > > Randy

> >

> > Namaste,

> >

> > Verbal violence is hardly the slaughterhouse and mostly only

> offends

> > people's egos and false images of themselves.........Tony

>

>

> Tony, please don't dismiss verbal violence as offending

> mostly only the ego. In a Domestic Violence situation,

> verbal violence is considered mental and emotional abuse,

> creating long-term problems in one's life. It literally

> breaks the spirit.

>

> I realize we aren't talking about a DV situation here,

> but violence is violence. There is no good and bad

> violence, which you appear to be stating.

 

Namaste

 

Yes my response was not explained deep enough. However in this

debate a human animal may need to think of who the insults and

verbal abuse are happening to. Whereas to a helpless, innocent

animal the cruelty, preparation and final murder are horrendous.

There is no way out for the animal it cant say 'Who am I'? and to

whom is this abuse happening.....ONS..Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> > Tony,

> >

> > I agree to disagree words are very powerful and if you beleive in

> > karma will add up much karma to you..there are many kinds of

> > slaughterhouse's Tony...

> > Blessings

> > Randy

>

> Cognitive dissonance/ <--associated to your violence and misplaced anger

toward Sai.. or Sai Baba folowers, Tony.

 

Era

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, "Era" <n0ndual@w...> wrote:

>

>

>

> > > Tony,

> > >

> > > I agree to disagree words are very powerful and if you beleive

in

> > > karma will add up much karma to you..there are many kinds of

> > > slaughterhouse's Tony...

> > > Blessings

> > > Randy

> >

> > Cognitive dissonance/ <--associated to your violence and

misplaced anger toward Sai.. or Sai Baba folowers, Tony.

>

> Era

>

Namaste,

 

No actually most sb devotees are vegetarians, sb insists on it and

quite devout, they are just conned by sb that's all. There are a few

lunatics that have learned to type and use the net, and this gives a

general appearance when it isn't.

 

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy and selfishness of believing

violence is fine, as long as one has somebody else to dirty their

hands..........ONS...Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> > > > Tony,

> > > >

> > > > I agree to disagree words are very powerful and if you

beleive

> in

> > > > karma will add up much karma to you..there are many kinds of

> > > > slaughterhouse's Tony...

> > > > Blessings

> > > > Randy

> > >

> > > Cognitive dissonance/ <--associated to your violence and

> misplaced anger toward Sai.. or Sai Baba folowers, Tony.

> >

> > Era

> >

> Namaste,

>

> No actually most sb devotees are vegetarians, sb insists on it and

> quite devout, they are just conned by sb that's all. There are a

few

> lunatics that have learned to type and use the net, and this gives

a

> general appearance when it isn't.

>

> I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy and selfishness of believing

> violence is fine, as long as one has somebody else to dirty their

> hands..........ONS...Tony

+++

Tony what about someone getting there own hands dirty by using

violent words towards another that does not beleve as you do?

This to me is much more of a violent act than eating meat..

Millions have died a terrible death just because of words..

Blessings

Randy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My site;

 

 

advaitajnana

 

Namaste,

 

I am still waiting for the debaters from the

 

/

 

I can't rely on my reply for I was moderated, a weak act, for

upsetting the choir. It seems that's what they are, for they

obviously don't want to debate me personally, but are singing to the

other choir members in the congregation. This is also the ego

talking in the defence of cognitive dissonance re meat eating and

being on the spiritual path. I don't know whether it is the acclaim

of the audience they want or to impress harsha, but it isn't to

answer me.

 

I will state again that I am only talking about self proclaimed

spiritual seekers not the ordinary people or primitives. They know

no better and haven't read about Ahimsa etc. THEY ARE NOT

HYPOCRITES.

 

Zenbob with his verbal non dualism, vndism, is doing a good job of

mental gymnastics again, mixing his apples and oranges all up to

preserve his desire to eat meat and ignore the suffering, of the

animal.

 

Lastly I have never seen a post where Ramana or any of his known

devotees extolled the eating of meat or the cruelty involved. Ramana

was known to protect his ashram pets from the attacks of other

animals but never with violence as such.

 

 

> , "Tony OClery"

<aoclery>

> wrote:

>

> Namaste,

>

> Some say it doesn't matter what we eat. However does the cruelty

of

> the slaughterhouse and the terror of the animal matter??..This is

the

> cognitive disfunction of many on the spiritual path. Their level

of

> awareness through purification of the vijnanamayakosa is not high

> enough. This ability of the human mind to filter out this bad

> information about death, slaughter and cruelty in favour of

satisfying

> an eogistic desire to suage one's palate and addiction is nothing

> short

> of amazing.

>

> I don't extend this to the non spiritual seekers as they don't

pretend

> or know to be any better...........ONS..Tony.

>

> --- End forwarded message ---

>

, Harsha wrote:

>

> *Tony, Tony, Tony. The food issue is a tough issue and we should

drop

> it. We all know what we know and we feel what we feel and that's

how it

> is. There is no point in justifying views or attacking those of

others

> by calling one of their koshas impure and all that because of

their

> diet. Ultimately it is an issue of control. We cannot control the

> preferences and conditioning of others. We see the conditioning of

> others through our own conditioning and we cannot even change our

 

Namaste,

 

Very good Harsha!!!I don't regard myself as having a completely

purified vijnanamayakosa, far from it. I don't condemn people for

eating meat if that is their level of understanding and they claim

no Daya or compassion. I don't condemn the ordinary person or the

primitives.

 

I have just wondered what the psychological cause was of this

obvious and fatal disconnect. I have finally come to the conclusion

it is moved by the same conditioning as the 'True Believer

Sydndrome' and 'Cognitive Dissonance'. As Zenbob pointed out Hitler

suffered from it. They don't fit exactly perhaps a psychologist can

give me an explanation of this amazing displacement. I would prefer

not to say that spiritual meat eaters suffered from the 'Hitler

Sydnrome', a condition of denial and vicarious violence.

 

I was interested in the debate and how the Ego handles it; it is a

window into the mind. As you say a food fight inevitably ends up

like this for people do not want to discuss their failings or wanton

desires. The ego rationalises everything away but the death agony

and scream of an innocent animal..........ONS..Tony.

http://www.geocities.com/aoclery/AVEGETARIANandAHIMSA.htm

 

I WAS CENSORED FOR THIS RESPONSE/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, "Tony OClery" <aoclery> wrote:

>

> My site;

>

>

> advaitajnana

>

> Namaste,

>

> I am still waiting for the debaters from the

>

> /

>

> I can't rely on my reply for I was moderated, a weak act, for

> upsetting the choir. It seems that's what they are, for they

> obviously don't want to debate me personally, but are singing to the

> other choir members in the congregation. This is also the ego

> talking in the defence of cognitive dissonance re meat eating and

> being on the spiritual path. I don't know whether it is the acclaim

> of the audience they want or to impress harsha, but it isn't to

> answer me.

>

> I will state again that I am only talking about self proclaimed

> spiritual seekers not the ordinary people or primitives. They know

> no better and haven't read about Ahimsa etc. THEY ARE NOT

> HYPOCRITES.

>

> Zenbob with his verbal non dualism, vndism, is doing a good job of

> mental gymnastics again, mixing his apples and oranges all up to

> preserve his desire to eat meat and ignore the suffering, of the

> animal.

>

> Lastly I have never seen a post where Ramana or any of his known

> devotees extolled the eating of meat or the cruelty involved. Ramana

> was known to protect his ashram pets from the attacks of other

> animals but never with violence as such.

>

>

>

> > , "Tony OClery"

> <aoclery>

> > wrote:

> >

> > Namaste,

> >

> > Some say it doesn't matter what we eat. However does the cruelty

> of

> > the slaughterhouse and the terror of the animal matter??..This is

> the

> > cognitive disfunction of many on the spiritual path. Their level

> of

> > awareness through purification of the vijnanamayakosa is not high

> > enough. This ability of the human mind to filter out this bad

> > information about death, slaughter and cruelty in favour of

> satisfying

> > an eogistic desire to suage one's palate and addiction is nothing

> > short

> > of amazing.

> >

> > I don't extend this to the non spiritual seekers as they don't

> pretend

> > or know to be any better...........ONS..Tony.

> >

> > --- End forwarded message ---

> >

> , Harsha wrote:

> >

> > *Tony, Tony, Tony. The food issue is a tough issue and we should

> drop

> > it. We all know what we know and we feel what we feel and that's

> how it

> > is. There is no point in justifying views or attacking those of

> others

> > by calling one of their koshas impure and all that because of

> their

> > diet. Ultimately it is an issue of control. We cannot control the

> > preferences and conditioning of others. We see the conditioning of

> > others through our own conditioning and we cannot even change our

>

> Namaste,

>

> Very good Harsha!!!I don't regard myself as having a completely

> purified vijnanamayakosa, far from it. I don't condemn people for

> eating meat if that is their level of understanding and they claim

> no Daya or compassion. I don't condemn the ordinary person or the

> primitives.

>

> I have just wondered what the psychological cause was of this

> obvious and fatal disconnect. I have finally come to the conclusion

> it is moved by the same conditioning as the 'True Believer

> Sydndrome' and 'Cognitive Dissonance'. As Zenbob pointed out Hitler

> suffered from it. They don't fit exactly perhaps a psychologist can

> give me an explanation of this amazing displacement. I would prefer

> not to say that spiritual meat eaters suffered from the 'Hitler

> Sydnrome', a condition of denial and vicarious violence.

>

> I was interested in the debate and how the Ego handles it; it is a

> window into the mind. As you say a food fight inevitably ends up

> like this for people do not want to discuss their failings or wanton

> desires. The ego rationalises everything away but the death agony

> and scream of an innocent animal..........ONS..Tony.

> http://www.geocities.com/aoclery/AVEGETARIANandAHIMSA.htm

>

> I WAS CENSORED FOR THIS RESPONSE/

>

 

what i have understood tony, from my deep love

for ramana, is that what matters is to be here.

all the things that have kept me from being

fully present have been my judgements about

how things, others and myself should be. even

and especially all of my judgements about

enlightenment. when all that falls away what

becomes clear is the Heart, ever beating,

offering compassion, not to some, but to all.

 

compassion is for all living beings. true freedom

for me consists of being present with all that is

arising for and as, me. where i withhold is where

i am not meeting my Self. when i look and am still,

there is an innocence radiating through all i meet

regardless of the actions. each of us are pinned to

the moment of who we are now. yes, all kinds of

transformations may occur on many levels, but it

all depends upon truly being here. what assists

this is the willingness to trust that the same

grace that calls you is unfolding with each of us

on our path.

 

--josie--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...