Guest guest Posted December 20, 2005 Report Share Posted December 20, 2005 >From PracticeofSelfInquiry/ Another Q.: Again, it seems today that if one inquires into the one who is bound, one discovers the ever-free Reality, the Self. If I would just do that, the experience would be that there is no one bound. In an earlier satsang you asked someone, "Who inquires?" You said that it cannot be the Self, and it cannot be the ego that inquires, because the ego does not exist and is only a concept, and it cannot be the Self that inquires because the Self is solitary, undifferentiated Being that just is at it is. So, the question is who does inquire? N.: When you so inquire, what happens? Q.: Nothing happens, but one realizes that which is transcendent of a nonexistent ego. It must be That which is and cannot be known but is what one is. N.: Every spiritual practice, inclusive of inquiry, is, in one sense, based upon illusion. The purpose of them is the destruction of the illusion. Even inquiry can be said to be so. What is unique about the inquiry to know yourself is that it does not include the dualism of the illusion that you are trying to destroy. Q.: Yes, it is the direct way to avoid that dualism. N.: When the illusion is gone, there is no separate inquirer and there is no separate activity of inquiry going on. Q.: It seems to me that the same applies to the questioner or the one that efforts (sic) It is said here that effort is required to the extent that there is ignorance. When one inquires into the one who is making the effort, the result experientially is that there is no one who efforts (sic) and that the effortless state is already present. N.: So, in practice, we do not attempt to eliminate effort. We look at who we are, and effort is taken care of by itself. If we simply attempted to eliminate effort, the ego would remain solidly intact, even though it's an illusion. Its effects would still be present. Q.: So, as long as the ego seems to be… N.: So, if only we put in the effort to which you alluded when you first started to speak, if only one's effort is fully put into realizing who we are, That which is natural, innate – sahaja, which is sometimes very loosely translated as "effortless" because it is natural—is realized. Q.: It seems very simple. N.: The Innate is very simple. Q.: The instruction seems very simple. Just do it. N.: It is as simple as the nature of the one who receives it. If you find this nature to be supremely simple, not allowing even so much as a thought to crowd in, then it is received. It is very simple. ------------------------------- Not two, Richard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.